SSI in steel frames subjected to near-fault earthquakes

Abstract Modern seismic codes are usually associated with far-field earthquakes and generally neglect soil–structure interaction, assuming that omission of this phenomenon leads to conservative results. This study investigates the effect of soil–structure interaction on the inelastic response of two-dimensional steel frames subjected to near-fault earthquakes, which have been recorded near to seismic faults with reverse and strike–slip mechanisms. In order to achieve this, thirty-six planar moment resisting steel frames which have been designed for seismic and vertical loads according to European codes are examined under the action of sixty near-fault pulse-like records. Simplified soil–structure interaction is carried out using springs and dashpots to simulate the flexibility of soil at the soil–foundation interface and adopting the effective properties of soil. Seismic response parameters, such as, interstorey drift ratios, maximum floor accelerations and inelastic displacement ratios are numerically determined by dynamic inelastic analyses. After a comprehensive statistical analysis, empirical expressions for these parameters in terms of the number of storeys of structures, the type of fault mechanism as well as the consideration or not of soil–structure interaction are obtained. Critical examination of the results indicates that the flexibility of soil strongly affects the seismic response of steel frames. Furthermore, it is concluded that the structural response parameters under consideration are noticeably influenced by the type of fault mechanism.

[1]  J. Berrill,et al.  The Loma Prieta, California, earthquake of October 17, 1989 : , 1990 .

[2]  George D. Hatzigeorgiou,et al.  Maximum seismic displacements evaluation of steel frames from their post-earthquake residual deformation , 2013, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[3]  George Gazetas,et al.  The role of soil in the collapse of 18 piers of Hanshin Expressway in the Kobe earthquake , 2006 .

[4]  Ahmed Ghobarah,et al.  Response‐based damage assessment of structures , 1999 .

[5]  R. S. Jangid,et al.  Performance of sliding systems under near-fault motions , 2001 .

[6]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  Effects of SSI on the Seismic Response of Older Structures Before & After Retrofit , 2009 .

[7]  Eric Rofes,et al.  Christchurch, New Zealand , 2003, The Statesman’s Yearbook Companion.

[8]  Mark Yashinsky Chapter B. The Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989 - Highway Systems , 1998 .

[9]  C. Hsein Juang,et al.  Normalized Shear Modulus and Material Damping Ratio Relationships , 2005 .

[10]  George Gazetas,et al.  Damage potential of near-fault records: sliding displacement against conventional “Intensity Measures” , 2013, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[11]  E. Miranda INELASTIC DISPLACEMENT RATIOS FOR STRUCTURES ON FIRM SITES , 2000 .

[12]  G. Ghodrati Amiri,et al.  Estimation of seismic demands of steel frames subjected to near‐fault earthquakes having forward directivity and comparing with pushover analysis results , 2013 .

[13]  Fernando Lopez-Caballero,et al.  Inelastic dynamic soil–structure interaction effects on moment-resisting frame buildings , 2013 .

[14]  Vincent P. Drnevich,et al.  Shear modulus and damping in soils , 1972 .

[15]  Boris Androić,et al.  International Structural Steel Sections: Design Tables according to Eurocode 3 , 2000 .

[16]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Response of Damped Oscillators to Cycloidal Pulses , 2000 .

[17]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Dimensional Response Analysis of Multistory Regular Steel MRF Subjected to Pulselike Earthquake Ground Motions , 2010 .

[18]  Subhash C. Goel,et al.  Toward Performance-Based Seismic Design of Structures , 1999 .

[19]  Dimitri E. Beskos,et al.  Dynamic interaction between 3‐D rigid surface foundations and comparison with the ATC‐3 provisions , 1995 .

[20]  Jeffrey S. Mulliken,et al.  Discrete model for dynamic through-the-soil coupling of 3-D foundations and structures , 1998 .

[21]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Analysis of accelerograms—Parkfield earthquake , 1967 .

[22]  Charles W. Roeder,et al.  NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTION EFFECTS ON SIMPLE STRUCTURES , 2001 .

[23]  George D. Hatzigeorgiou,et al.  Damping modification factors for SDOF systems subjected to near‐fault, far‐fault and artificial earthquakes , 2010 .

[24]  A. Chopra,et al.  Inelastic Deformation Ratios for Design and Evaluation of Structures: Single-Degree-of- Freedom Bilinear Systems , 2004 .

[25]  George D. Hatzigeorgiou,et al.  Inelastic displacement ratios for SDOF structures subjected to repeated earthquakes , 2009 .

[26]  A. Chopra,et al.  Comparing response of SDF systems to near‐fault and far‐fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions , 2001 .

[27]  George D. Hatzigeorgiou,et al.  A new damage index for plane steel frames exhibiting strength and stiffness degradation under seismic motion , 2013 .

[28]  J. Wolf Dynamic soil-structure interaction , 1985 .

[29]  S. Mahin,et al.  Aseismic design implications of near‐fault san fernando earthquake records , 1978 .

[30]  E. Gaylord,et al.  Design of Steel Structures , 1972 .

[31]  Nicos Makris,et al.  RIGIDITY–PLASTICITY–VISCOSITY: CAN ELECTRORHEOLOGICAL DAMPERS PROTECT BASE‐ISOLATED STRUCTURES FROM NEAR‐SOURCE GROUND MOTIONS? , 1997 .

[32]  George P. Mavroeidis,et al.  A Mathematical Representation of Near-Fault Ground Motions , 2003 .

[33]  George Gazetas,et al.  SEISMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION: BENEFICIAL OR DETRIMENTAL? , 2000 .

[34]  Praveen K. Malhotra,et al.  Response of buildings to near‐field pulse‐like ground motions , 1999 .

[35]  Joseph E. Bowles,et al.  Foundation analysis and design , 1968 .

[36]  George D. Hatzigeorgiou,et al.  Behavior factors for nonlinear structures subjected to multiple near-fault earthquakes , 2010 .

[37]  I. M. Idriss,et al.  Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Analyses of Cohesionless Soils , 1986 .

[38]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[39]  Theodore L. Karavasilis,et al.  Behavior Factor for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Plane Steel Moment Resisting Frames , 2007 .

[40]  G. Hatzigeorgiou,et al.  Inelastic Displacement Ratio Spectrum for Near-Fault Ground Motions , 2013 .

[41]  Anastasios Sextos,et al.  Selection of earthquake ground motion records: A state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective , 2010 .

[42]  John P. Wolf,et al.  Spring‐dashpot‐mass models for foundation vibrations , 1997 .

[43]  Jonathan Knappett,et al.  Craig’s Soil Mechanics , 1974 .

[44]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Seismic fragilities of non-ductile reinforced concrete frames with consideration of soil structure interaction , 2012 .

[45]  George D. Hatzigeorgiou,et al.  Maximum damping forces for structures with viscous dampers under near-source earthquakes , 2014 .

[46]  George D. Hatzigeorgiou,et al.  Structural pounding between adjacent buildings subjected to strong ground motions. Part I: The effect of different structures arrangement , 2013 .

[47]  Marcello Ciampoli,et al.  Effects of Soil-Structure Interaction on Inelastic Seismic Response of Bridge Piers , 1995 .