“The Train Has Left the Station”: The Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies and the Shaping of Nanotechnology Policy in the United States

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the efforts of the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (PEN) in seeking to influence nanotechnology policy in the United States. Using the conceptual framework of anticipatory governance to guide the analysis, a series of strategies that PEN adopted will be described, including leveraging external expertise, developing cross-disciplinary research products, providing a future-oriented view on policy analysis, and building a brand for communications and outreach. This case study is a useful example in demonstrating the recent conceptual shift away from relying on government-led technology assessment efforts to consider the longer-term implications of new technologies toward the concept of anticipatory governance that includes a more substantive role for nongovernmental actors, that in providing forward-looking, actionable intelligence for decision makers. Considering the example of PEN also highlights the critical role that boundary-spanning organizations play in linking together disparate communities of expertise.

[1]  B. Balogh Chain Reaction: Acknowledgments , 1991 .

[2]  Clark A. Miller Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime , 2001 .

[3]  Erik Fisher,et al.  Ethnographic Invention: Probing the Capacity of Laboratory Decisions , 2007 .

[4]  Mihail C Roco,et al.  Converging science and technology at the nanoscale: opportunities for education and training , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  The future of public engagement , 2007 .

[6]  David H. Guston,et al.  Innovation policy: not just a jumbo shrimp , 2008, Nature.

[7]  David H. Guston,et al.  National Citizens’ Technology Forum: Nanotechnologies and Human Enhancement , 2013 .

[8]  D. Guston Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction , 2001 .

[9]  David W. Cash,et al.  “In Order to Aid in Diffusing Useful and Practical Information”: Agricultural Extension and Boundary Organizations , 2001 .

[10]  W. Bainbridge,et al.  Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology , 2001 .

[11]  M. Roco Broader Societal Issues of Nanotechnology , 2003 .

[12]  Erik Fisher,et al.  Lab‐scale intervention , 2009, EMBO reports.

[13]  C. Mitcham,et al.  Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance From Within , 2006 .

[14]  A. Rip,et al.  The past and future of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .

[15]  David H. Guston,et al.  Real-time technology assessment , 2020, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[16]  Gregory C. Kunkle New challenge or the past revisited , 1995 .

[17]  Jennifer Kuzma,et al.  An Integrated Approach to Oversight Assessment for Emerging Technologies , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  E. Q. Daddario Academic science and the Federal Government. , 1968, Science.

[19]  David H. Guston,et al.  The Anticipatory Governance of Emerging Technologies , 2010 .

[20]  A. Dupree,et al.  Science in the Federal Government , 1957 .

[21]  David H. Guston,et al.  Technology Assessment: The End of OTA , 1997 .

[22]  Todd M. La Porte,et al.  New opportunities for technology assessment in the post-OTA world , 1997 .

[23]  D. Sarewitz Anticipatory Governance of Emerging Technologies , 2011 .

[24]  J. Pielke The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics , 2007 .

[25]  Cynthia Selin,et al.  Envisioning nanotechnology: New media and future-oriented stakeholder dialogue , 2010 .

[26]  Ray Quay,et al.  Anticipatory Governance , 2010 .

[27]  Lang Tran,et al.  Safe handling of nanotechnology , 2006, Nature.

[28]  T. Keating Lessons from the Recent History of the Health Effects Institute , 2001 .

[29]  J. Stilgoe,et al.  Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society , 2012, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[30]  Cynthia Selin,et al.  Energy Futures: Five Dilemmas of the Practice of Anticipatory Governance , 2012 .

[31]  David H. Guston,et al.  Introduction: The end of OTA and the future of technology assessment , 1997 .