Microarray Gene Expression Profiling of a Human Glioblastoma Cell Line Exposed In Vitro to a 1.9 GHz Pulse-Modulated Radiofrequency Field

Abstract Qutob, S. S., Chauhan, V., Bellier, P. V., Yauk, C. L., Douglas, G. R., Berndt, L., Williams, A., Gajda, G. B., Lemay, E., Thansandote, A. and McNamee, J. P. Microarray Gene Expression Profiling of a Human Glioblastoma Cell Line Exposed In Vitro to a 1.9 GHz Pulse-Modulated Radiofrequency Field. Radiat. Res. 165, 636–644 (2006). The widespread use of mobile phones has led to public concerns about the health effects associated with exposure to radiofrequency (RF) fields. The paramount concern of most persons relates to the potential of these fields to cause cancer. Unlike ionizing radiation, RF fields used for mobile telecommunications (800–1900 MHz) do not possess sufficient energy to directly damage DNA. Most rodent bioassay and in vitro genotoxicity/mutation studies have reported that RF fields at non-thermal levels have no direct mutagenic, genotoxic or carcinogenic effects. However, some evidence has suggested that RF fields may cause detectable postexposure changes in gene expression. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the ability of exposure to a 1.9 GHz pulse-modulated RF field for 4 h at specific absorption rates (SARs) of 0.1, 1.0 and 10.0 W/kg to affect global gene expression in U87MG glioblastoma cells. We found no evidence that non-thermal RF fields can affect gene expression in cultured U87MG cells relative to the nonirradiated control groups, whereas exposure to heat shock at 43°C for 1 h up-regulated a number of typical stress-responsive genes in the positive control group. Future studies will assess the effect of RF fields on other cell lines and on gene expression in the mouse brain after in vivo exposure.

[1]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Leeka Kheifets,et al.  Epidemiology of Health Effects of Radiofrequency Exposure , 2004, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  A. Poustka,et al.  Parameter estimation for the calibration and variance stabilization of microarray data , 2003, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[4]  W F Pickard,et al.  Proto-oncogene mRNA levels and activities of multiple transcription factors in C3H 10T 1/2 murine embryonic fibroblasts exposed to 835.62 and 847.74 MHz cellular phone communication frequency radiation. , 1999, Radiation research.

[5]  Pierre R. Bushel,et al.  Assessing Gene Significance from cDNA Microarray Expression Data via Mixed Models , 2001, J. Comput. Biol..

[6]  K. Kregel,et al.  Heat shock proteins: modifying factors in physiological stress responses and acquired thermotolerance. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.

[7]  Vijayalaxmi,et al.  NF‐κB DNA‐binding activity after high peak power pulsed microwave (8.2 GHz) exposure of normal human monocytes , 2002, Bioelectromagnetics.

[8]  Y. Takashima,et al.  Effects of exposure to a 1950 MHz radio frequency field on expression of Hsp70 and Hsp27 in human glioma cells , 2005, Bioelectromagnetics.

[9]  X. Cui,et al.  Improved statistical tests for differential gene expression by shrinking variance components estimates. , 2005, Biostatistics.

[10]  N. Kuster,et al.  High frequency electromagnetic fields (GSM signals) affect gene expression levels in tumor suppressor p53‐deficient embryonic stem cells , 2004, Bioelectromagnetics.

[11]  E. Moros,et al.  The Heat-Shock Factor is not Activated in Mammalian Cells Exposed to Cellular Phone Frequency Microwaves , 2005, Radiation research.

[12]  Chenn Q. Zhou,et al.  2.45 GHz radiofrequency fields alter gene expression in cultured human cells , 2005, FEBS letters.

[13]  I. Cotgreave,et al.  Biological stress responses to radio frequency electromagnetic radiation: are mobile phones really so (heat) shocking? , 2005, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[14]  W. R. Adey,et al.  Exposure of nerve growth factor-treated PC12 rat pheochromocytoma cells to a modulated radiofrequency field at 836.55 MHz: effects on c-jun and c-fos expression. , 1997, Bioelectromagnetics.

[15]  S. Velizarov,et al.  CHANGES IN CELLULAR PROTEINS DUE TO ENVIRONMENTAL NON-IONIZING RADIATION. I. HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS , 2001 .

[16]  J E Moulder,et al.  Mobile phones, mobile phone base stations and cancer: a review , 2005, International journal of radiation biology.

[17]  Hao Wu,et al.  MAANOVA: A Software Package for the Analysis of Spotted cDNA Microarray Experiments , 2003 .

[18]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. , 2001, Methods.

[19]  J P McNamee,et al.  DNA Damage and Micronucleus Induction in Human Leukocytes after Acute In Vitro Exposure to a 1.9 GHz Continuous-Wave Radiofrequency Field , 2002, Radiation research.

[20]  T. Litovitz,et al.  The role of coherence time in the effect of microwaves on ornithine decarboxylase activity. , 1993, Bioelectromagnetics.

[21]  N. Kuster,et al.  1800 MHz radiofrequency (mobile phones, different Global System for Mobile communication modulations) does not affect apoptosis and heat shock protein 70 level in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from young and old donors , 2004, International journal of radiation biology.

[22]  N Kuster,et al.  Effect of global system for mobile communication microwave exposure on the genomic response of the rat brain , 1997, Neuroscience.

[23]  Dariusz Leszczynski,et al.  Non-thermal activation of the hsp27/p38MAPK stress pathway by mobile phone radiation in human endothelial cells: molecular mechanism for cancer- and blood-brain barrier-related effects. , 2002, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.

[24]  S F Cleary,et al.  Stress proteins are not induced in mammalian cells exposed to radiofrequency or microwave radiation. , 1997, Bioelectromagnetics.

[25]  S. Gullans,et al.  A combination of NaCl and urea enhances survival of IMCD cells to hyperosmolality. , 1998, American journal of physiology. Renal physiology.

[26]  J. Mcnamee,et al.  Cylindrical waveguide applicator for in vitro exposure of cell culture samples to 1.9‐GHz radiofrequency fields , 2002, Bioelectromagnetics.

[27]  E. Moros,et al.  Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields do not Alter the Cell Cycle Progression of C3H 10T and U87MG Cells , 2001, Radiation research.

[28]  D. Thomas,et al.  Transgenic nematodes as biomonitors of microwave-induced stress. , 1998, Mutation research.

[29]  David W. P. Thomas,et al.  Cell biology: Non-thermal heat-shock response to microwaves , 2000, Nature.

[30]  Anthony T Barker,et al.  Effect of 900 MHz Electromagnetic Fields on Nonthermal Induction of Heat-Shock Proteins in Human Leukocytes , 2005, Radiation research.

[31]  G. B. Gajda,et al.  DNA Damage in Human Leukocytes after Acute In Vitro Exposure to a 1.9 GHz Pulse-Modulated Radiofrequency Field , 2002, Radiation research.

[32]  H. Arai,et al.  Microarray analysis of temporal gene responses to ionizing radiation in two glioblastoma cell lines: up-regulation of DNA repair genes. , 2004, Journal of radiation research.