‘Inhibition of return’ without visual input

Inhibition of return (IOR) is the name that is associated with a response time (RT) delay to a visual stimulus presented at a recently cued spatial location. Two experiments with 26 undergraduates used an auditory analog to the visual IOR paradigm to examine whether manual RT inhibition would occur in the absence of visual input. In Experiment 1, subjects were instructed to prepare saccades, with their eyes closed, to the location of an auditory cue, and an RT delay to targets presented at the cued location was observed throughout the 1400 msec timecourse. Experiment 2 was used to examine the role of spatial distance between the auditory cue and the target, and found that as in the visual domain, there is a decrease in the magnitude of RT inhibition with increasing distance. Additionally, as in vision, support was found for the inhibition of targets presented in the same hemispace as the cue, whereas targets presented contralaterally were generally found to be facilitated. It was concluded that IOR is capable of acting in the auditory domain, and the possible neural origins of this effect are discussed. The result that IOR can occur even in the absence of visual input supports recent findings that perceptual representations of visual input are not the source of inhibition in this paradigm.

[1]  Jonathan Vaughan,et al.  Saccades Directed at Previously Attended Locations in Space , 1984 .

[2]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Foreperiod and simple reaction time. , 1981 .

[3]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection? , 1994, Vision Research.

[4]  G. Tassinari,et al.  Ipsilateral inhibition and contralateral facilitation of simple reaction time to non-foveal visual targets from non-informative visual cues. , 1989, Acta psychologica.

[5]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  W C Schmidt,et al.  Inhibition of return is not detected using illusory line motion , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  M. Posner Chronometric explorations of mind : the third Paul M. Fitts lectures, delivered at the University of Michigan, September 1976 , 1978 .

[8]  R A Abrams,et al.  Color-based inhibition of return , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Elizabeth M. Wenzel,et al.  Three-dimensional virtual acoustic displays , 1992 .

[10]  C. A. Marzi,et al.  Spatial distribution of the inhibitory effect of peripheral non-informative cues on simple reaction time to non-fixated visual targets , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  J. Pratt,et al.  Inhibition of return in a discrimination task , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  W. Neill,et al.  Does “inhibition of return” occur in discrimination tasks? , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  H Egeth,et al.  Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Robert Hockey,et al.  Effects of repetition on the facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Jon Driver,et al.  Covert Spatial Orienting in Audition: Exogenous and Endogenous Mechanisms , 1994 .

[16]  B. Stein,et al.  The Merging of the Senses , 1993 .

[17]  P. Calabresi,et al.  Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  The Development of Inhibition of Return in Early Infancy , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[20]  Nigel Harvey,et al.  Non-Informative Effects of Stimuli Functioning as Cues , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  H Egeth,et al.  Inhibition and disinhibition of return: Evidence from temporal order judgments , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  R. Abrams,et al.  Inhibition of return: effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  C. A. Marzi,et al.  Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  R. Klein,et al.  Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. , 1994 .

[25]  E. Maylor,et al.  Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  Elizabeth M. Wenzel,et al.  Localization in Virtual Acoustic Displays , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[28]  M. Posner,et al.  Inhibition of return : Neural basis and function , 1985 .

[29]  A. Lambert,et al.  Peripheral visual changes and spatial attention. , 1991, Acta psychologica.

[30]  William C. Schmidt Sound sequencing software for the Amiga microcomputer , 1996 .

[31]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Supramodal and modality-specific mechanisms for stimulus-driven shifts of auditory and visual attention. , 1994, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.