Age- and Gender-Based Differences in Children’s Interactions with a Gender-Matching Robot

Social robots are increasingly being used to encourage social, emotional and cognitive growth in children. However, in order to establish social and bonding interactions, social robots need to be able to exhibit adaptive strategies to keep children engaged and interested. Adaptive strategies of a social robot based on children’s age and gender are motivated by the comprehensive theory on gender development. Given the strong influence of gender in children’s cognitive development, the experiment first examined the responses of 107 children, ages 5–12, whether synthesized voice evokes gender associations in children. The results suggest that young children (ages 5–8) are not able to successfully attribute gender to the robot in correspondence with the synthesized voice. In addition, we explicitly investigated children’s preferences for the robot’s gender, and the results were contrary to our expectations: young children indicated their preference for a robot with a matching gender while there was no difference in preferences for a robot’s gender by older children (ages 9–12).

[1]  E. Maccoby,et al.  Gender as a social category. , 1988 .

[2]  L. Serbin,et al.  The emergence of gender segregation in toddler playgroups. , 1994, New directions for child development.

[3]  M. Yee,et al.  The development of gender differentiation in young children. , 1994, The British journal of social psychology.

[4]  A. Doyle,et al.  Gender, ethnic, and body type biases: The generality of prejudice in childhood. , 1994 .

[5]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  BDI Agents: From Theory to Practice , 1995, ICMAS.

[6]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[7]  Gender identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for psychosocial adjustment. , 2001 .

[8]  M. Verkuyten,et al.  Ethnic and gender bias among Dutch and Turkish children in late childhood: The role of social context , 2001 .

[9]  Gail D. Heyman,et al.  Children’s Interpretation of Ambiguous Behavior: Evidence for a ‘Boys are Bad’ Bias , 2001 .

[10]  Scott S. Snibbe,et al.  Experiences with Sparky, a Social Robot , 2002 .

[11]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Whose job is it anyway? a study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task , 2004 .

[12]  J. Cook,et al.  Child Development: Principles and Perspectives , 2004 .

[13]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[14]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship , 2005 .

[15]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Testing the media equation with children , 2005, CHI.

[16]  Christy H. Weer,et al.  The Impact of Gender Similarity, Racial Similarity, and Work Culture on Family-Supportive Supervision , 2006 .

[17]  Sarah N. Woods,et al.  Exploring the design space of robots: Children's perspectives , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[18]  J. Johnson,et al.  Children, robotics, and education , 2003, Artificial Life and Robotics.

[19]  A. Bell.  Designing and testing questionnaires for children , 2007 .

[20]  K. M. Lee,et al.  Children’s Responses to Computer-Synthesized Speech in Educational Media: Gender Consistency and Gender Similarity Effects , 2007 .

[21]  Charles R. Crowell,et al.  Robot social presence and gender: Do females view robots differently than males? , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[22]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  How people anthropomorphize robots , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[23]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Persuasive Robotics: The influence of robot gender on human behavior , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[24]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Effects of Embodiment and Gestures on Social Interaction in Drumming Games with a Humanoid Robot , 2009, Adv. Robotics.

[25]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Robot-directed speech as a means of exploring conceptualizations of robots , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[26]  C. Mehta,et al.  Sex segregation in friendships and normative contexts across the life span , 2009 .

[27]  Charles R. Crowelly,et al.  Gendered voice and robot entities: Perceptions and reactions of male and female subjects , 2009 .

[28]  D. Ruble,et al.  Patterns of gender development. , 2010, Annual review of psychology.

[29]  C. Fine.  Delusions of gender : how our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference , 2010 .

[30]  Cindy Clark.  In A Younger Voice: Doing Child-Centered Qualitative Research , 2010 .

[31]  D. Ruble,et al.  Gender Development Research in Sex Roles: Historical Trends and Future Directions , 2011, Sex roles.

[32]  Fang-Wu Tung,et al.  Influence of Gender and Age on the Attitudes of Children towards Humanoid Robots , 2011, HCI.

[33]  Paul Baxter,et al.  Child-robot interaction in the wild: advice to the aspiring experimenter , 2011, ICMI '11.

[34]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  The Effects of Synthesized Voice Accents on User Perceptions of Robots , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[35]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Long-Term Interactions with Empathic Robots: Evaluating Perceived Support in Children , 2012, ICSR.

[36]  C. Auster,et al.  The Gender Marketing of Toys: An Analysis of Color and Type of Toy on the Disney Store Website , 2012 .

[37]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  ‘If you sound like me, you must be more human’: On the interplay of robot and user features on human-robot acceptance and anthropomorphism , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[38]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Child-Robot Interaction: Perspectives and Challenges , 2013, ICSR.

[39]  Zahra Katibeh.  Techniques for Real-time Multi-person Face Tracking for Human-robot Dialogue , 2013 .

[40]  João Sequeira,et al.  A Multimodal Emotion Detection System during Human-Robot Interaction , 2013, Sensors.

[41]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Investigating the impact of pedagogical agent gender matching and learner choice on learning outcomes and perceptions , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[42]  Fabio Tesser,et al.  Multimodal child-robot interaction: building social bonds , 2013, HRI 2013.

[43]  Anara Sandygulova,et al.  Investigating the Impact of Gender Development in Child-Robot Interaction , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[44]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  Which Robot Behavior Can Motivate Children to Tidy up Their Toys? Design and Evaluation of “Ranger” , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[45]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  L2TOR - Second Language Tutoring using Social Robots , 2015 .

[46]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  The Robot Who Tried Too Hard: Social Behaviour of a Robot Tutor Can Negatively Affect Child Learning , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[47]  Anara Sandygulova,et al.  Children's Perception of Synthesized Voice: Robot's Gender, Age and Accent , 2015, ICSR.

[48]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  The CoWriter Project: Teaching a Robot how to Write , 2015, HRI.

[49]  Anara Sandygulova,et al.  “You win, I lose”: Towards adapting robot's teaching strategy , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[50]  Anara Sandygulova,et al.  Investigating the impact of gender segregation within observational pretend play interaction , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).