Effectiveness Measurement of Facilities Layout

Measuring effectiveness in an existing facilities layout is a prerequisite in order to initiate any action that will improve layout effectiveness. Available methods on measurement of layout effectiveness help measure it in respect to only material handling cost and select an effective layout from a set of available alternatives. Nevertheless, factors such as empty travel of material handling equipment, layout flexibility and area utilisation contribute significantly towards the layout effectiveness. Thus, it is necessary to have a measurement model to determine the facilities layout’s effectiveness by considering all significant factors. Hence, a measurement model considering a set of three layout effectiveness factors namely Facilities Layout Flexibility (FLF), Productive Area Utilisation (PAU) and Closeness Gap (CG) is developed in our research. The proposed model will enable the decision-maker of a manufacturing enterprise to analyse a layout in three different aspects; based on which they can make decision towards productivity improvement. Due to the space limiation, this paper only discusses about the measurement of the CG. The CG is developed in respect to the objective of bringing closer the highly interactive facilities/departments. The CG presented in this paper extends other related works by incorporating numerous aspects of layout that include: empty travel of material handling equipment, information flow, personnel flow and equipment flow.

[1]  F. Dweiri Fuzzy development of crisp activity relationship charts for facilities layout , 1999 .

[2]  B. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Fuzzy decision support system for manufacturing facilities layout planning , 2005, Decis. Support Syst..

[3]  Michael H. Hu,et al.  Using genetic algorithms on facilities layout problems , 2004 .

[4]  Kanthi M.N. Muthiah,et al.  A review of literature on manufacturing systems productivity measurement and improvement , 2006 .

[5]  D. T. Gethin,et al.  An effective sorting method for facility layout construction , 1993 .

[6]  Felix T.S. Chan,et al.  A genetic algorithm for facility layout problems , 1998 .

[7]  Sue Abdinnour-Helm,et al.  Tabu search based heuristics for multi-floor facility layout , 2000 .

[8]  M. Adel El-Baz,et al.  A genetic algorithm for facility layout problems of different manufacturing environments , 2004, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[9]  R. Suri,et al.  Performance evaluation of discrete manufacturing systems , 1990, IEEE Control Systems Magazine.

[10]  Saifallah Benjaafar,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of Congestion in the Design of Facility Layouts , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Reinaldo Morabito,et al.  OPEN QUEUEING NETWORKS: OPTIMIZATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION MODELS FOR DISCRETE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS * , 2009 .

[12]  E. N. Corlett,et al.  International conference on production researchBirmingham, UK 610 April, 1970 , 1970 .

[13]  Alan R. McKendall,et al.  FACILITY LAYOUT OF IRREGULAR-SHAPED DEPARTMENTS USING A NESTED APPROACH , 1999 .

[14]  A. D. Raoot,et al.  A ‘fuzzy’ approach to facilities lay-out planning , 1991 .

[15]  Michael C. Fu,et al.  Queueing theory in manufacturing: A survey , 1999 .

[16]  Leon F. McGinnis,et al.  Facility Layout and Location: An Analytical Approach , 1991 .