Finding MOFs for highly selective CO2/N2 adsorption using materials screening based on efficient assignment of atomic point charges.

Electrostatic interactions are a critical factor in the adsorption of quadrupolar species such as CO(2) and N(2) in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and other nanoporous materials. We show how a version of the semiempirical charge equilibration method suitable for periodic materials can be used to efficiently assign charges and allow molecular simulations for a large number of MOFs. This approach is illustrated by simulating CO(2) and N(2) adsorption in ~500 MOFs; this is the largest set of structures for which this information has been reported to date. For materials predicted by our calculations to have promising adsorption selectivities, we performed more detailed calculations in which accurate quantum chemistry methods were used to assign atomic point charges, and molecular simulations were used to assess molecular diffusivities and binary adsorption isotherms. Our results identify two MOFs, experimentally known to be stable upon solvent removal, that are predicted to show no diffusion limitations for adsorbed molecules and extremely high CO(2)/N(2) adsorption selectivities for CO(2) adsorption from dry air and from gas mixtures typical of dry flue gas.

[1]  R. Snurr,et al.  Using molecular simulation to characterise metal-organic frameworks for adsorption applications. , 2009, Chemical Society reviews.

[2]  J. Ilja Siepmann,et al.  Vapor–liquid equilibria of mixtures containing alkanes, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen , 2001 .

[3]  Sankar Nair,et al.  Efficient calculation of diffusion limitations in metal organic framework materials: a tool for identifying materials for kinetic separations. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[4]  F. Allen The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising. , 2002, Acta crystallographica. Section B, Structural science.

[5]  Seda Keskin,et al.  Can metal-organic framework materials play a useful role in large-scale carbon dioxide separations? , 2010, ChemSusChem.

[6]  C. Wilmer,et al.  Towards rapid computational screening of metal-organic frameworks for carbon dioxide capture: Calculation of framework charges via charge equilibration , 2011 .

[7]  C. Wilmer,et al.  Large-scale screening of hypothetical metal-organic frameworks. , 2012, Nature chemistry.

[8]  David S. Sholl,et al.  Transport Diffusivities of CH4, CF4, He, Ne, Ar, Xe, and SF6 in Silicalite from Atomistic Simulations , 2002 .

[9]  D. Sholl,et al.  Accurate Treatment of Electrostatics during Molecular Adsorption in Nanoporous Crystals without Assigning Point Charges to Framework Atoms , 2011 .

[10]  D. Sholl Understanding macroscopic diffusion of adsorbed molecules in crystalline nanoporous materials via atomistic simulations. , 2006, Accounts of chemical research.

[11]  Alexis T. Bell,et al.  Prediction of low occupancy sorption of alkanes in silicalite , 1990 .

[12]  T. Rojo,et al.  Structural, Spectroscopic, Magnetic and Thermal Properties in the [SrM(C3H2O4)2(H2O)5] · 2 H2O (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni) System: Precursors of SrMO3–x Mixed Oxides , 1999 .

[13]  F. L. Hirshfeld Bonded-atom fragments for describing molecular charge densities , 1977 .

[14]  Ling Ma,et al.  NLO-active zinc(II) and cadmium(II) coordination networks with 8-fold diamondoid structures , 2000 .

[15]  Tom K Woo,et al.  Electrostatic Potential Derived Atomic Charges for Periodic Systems Using a Modified Error Functional. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[16]  Egon L. Willighagen,et al.  The Blue Obelisk—Interoperability in Chemical Informatics , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[17]  David S. Sholl,et al.  Adsorption and separation of hydrogen isotopes in carbon nanotubes: Multicomponent grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations , 2002 .

[18]  W. Goddard,et al.  UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations , 1992 .

[19]  Bo Wang,et al.  Highly efficient separation of carbon dioxide by a metal-organic framework replete with open metal sites , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Rajamani Krishna,et al.  Comment on comparative molecular simulation study of CO2/N2 and CH4/N2 separation in zeolites and metal-organic frameworks. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[21]  Hong-Cai Zhou,et al.  Selective gas adsorption and separation in metal-organic frameworks. , 2009, Chemical Society reviews.

[22]  A. Rappé,et al.  Toward an Understanding of Zeolite Y as a Cracking Catalyst with the Use of Periodic Charge Equilibration , 1996 .

[23]  David S. Sholl,et al.  Progress, Opportunities, and Challenges for Applying Atomically Detailed Modeling to Molecular Adsorption and Transport in Metal−Organic Framework Materials , 2009 .

[24]  O. Kitao,et al.  I: METHODOLOGY , 2003, Deception: Counterdeception and Counterintelligence.

[25]  Ian D. Williams,et al.  Physical stability vs. chemical lability in microporous metal coordination polymers: a comparison of [Cu(OH)(INA)]n and [Cu(INA)2]n: INA = 1,4-(NC5H4CO2). , 2002, Chemical communications.

[26]  Randall Q Snurr,et al.  Screening of metal-organic frameworks for carbon dioxide capture from flue gas using a combined experimental and modeling approach. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[27]  Sankar Nair,et al.  Pore size analysis of >250,000 hypothetical zeolites. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[28]  R. Snurr,et al.  Effects of molecular siting and adsorbent heterogeneity on the ideality of adsorption equilibria. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[29]  W. Goddard,et al.  Charge equilibration for molecular dynamics simulations , 1991 .

[30]  Dan Zhao,et al.  Potential applications of metal-organic frameworks , 2009 .

[31]  K. Gubbins,et al.  Adsorption, isosteric heat and commensurate-incommensurate transition of methane on graphite , 1993 .

[32]  Kwong H. Yung,et al.  Carbon Dioxide's Liquid-Vapor Coexistence Curve And Critical Properties as Predicted by a Simple Molecular Model , 1995 .

[33]  Alan L. Myers,et al.  Thermodynamics of mixed‐gas adsorption , 1965 .

[34]  David S Sholl,et al.  Chemically Meaningful Atomic Charges That Reproduce the Electrostatic Potential in Periodic and Nonperiodic Materials. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[35]  Chongli Zhong,et al.  A General Approach for Estimating Framework Charges in Metal−Organic Frameworks , 2010 .

[36]  M. Allendorf,et al.  Metal‐Organic Frameworks: A Rapidly Growing Class of Versatile Nanoporous Materials , 2011, Advanced materials.

[37]  E. Vogt,et al.  Semi-empirical atomic charges for use in computational chemistry of molecular sieves , 1998 .

[38]  Sang Soo Han,et al.  Recent advances on simulation and theory of hydrogen storage in metal-organic frameworks and covalent organic frameworks. , 2009, Chemical Society reviews.

[39]  D. Sholl,et al.  Examining the accuracy of ideal adsorbed solution theory without curve-fitting using transition matrix Monte Carlo simulations. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.