Fooling the size–weight illusion—Using augmented reality to eliminate the effect of size on perceptions of heaviness and sensorimotor prediction

Augmented reality, whereby computer-generated images are overlaid onto the physical environment, is becoming significant part of the world of education and training. Little is known, however, about how these external images are treated by the sensorimotor system of the user – are they fully integrated into the external environmental cues, or largely ignored by low-level perceptual and motor processes? Here, we examined this question in the context of the size–weight illusion (SWI). Thirty-two participants repeatedly lifted and reported the heaviness of two cubes of unequal volume but equal mass in alternation. Half of the participants saw semi-transparent equally sized holographic cubes superimposed onto the physical cubes through a head-mounted display. Fingertip force rates were measured prior to lift-off to determine how the holograms influenced sensorimotor prediction, while verbal reports of heaviness after each lift indicated how the holographic size cues influenced the SWI. As expected, participants who lifted without augmented visual cues lifted the large object at a higher rate of force than the small object on early lifts and experienced a robust SWI across all trials. In contrast, participants who lifted the (apparently equal-sized) augmented cubes used similar force rates for each object. Furthermore, they experienced no SWI during the first lifts of the objects, with a SWI developing over repeated trials. These results indicate that holographic cues initially dominate physical cues and cognitive knowledge, but are dismissed when conflicting with cues from other senses.

[1]  M. Davare,et al.  Dynamic size-weight changes after object lifting reduce the size-weight illusion , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[2]  A. Dijker The role of expectancies in the size-weight illusion: A review of theoretical and empirical arguments and a new explanation , 2014, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[3]  Gavin Buckingham,et al.  Examining the size–weight illusion with visuo-haptic conflict in immersive virtual reality , 2019, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  K. Drewing,et al.  A mass-density model can account for the size-weight illusion , 2018, PloS one.

[5]  Flanagan,et al.  Sensorimotor Control of Grasping: Sensory control of object manipulation , 2009 .

[6]  M. Goodale,et al.  The role of vision in detecting and correcting fingertip force errors during object lifting. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[7]  I. A. Kuling,et al.  When Does One Decide How Heavy an Object Feels While Picking It Up? , 2019, Psychological science.

[8]  Satoru Kawai,et al.  A reexamination of the size–weight illusion induced by visual size cues , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  M. Turvey,et al.  Weight perception and the haptic size-weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Elizabeth J. Saccone,et al.  Container size exerts a stronger influence than liquid volume on the perceived weight of objects , 2019, Cognition.

[11]  Frank P. Schulte,et al.  Seeing Size and Feeling Weight: The Size-Weight Illusion in Natural and Virtual Reality , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[12]  J. Hermsdörfer,et al.  An augmented reality approach for ADL support in Alzheimer’s disease: a crossover trial , 2019, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[13]  Joachim Hermsdörfer,et al.  Sensorimotor Control of Grasping: Physiology and Pathophysiology , 2009 .

[14]  J. Hermsdörfer,et al.  Size–weight illusion and anticipatory grip force scaling following unilateral cortical brain lesion , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Franck Multon,et al.  Virtual reality, a serious game for understanding performance and training players in sport , 2009 .

[16]  C. M. Davis,et al.  Lifting movements in the size-weight illusion , 1976 .

[17]  Franck Multon,et al.  Using Virtual Reality to Analyze Sports Performance , 2010, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[18]  D. Levac,et al.  What is the impact of user affect on motor learning in virtual environments after stroke? A scoping review , 2019, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[19]  Jennifer L. Milne,et al.  The Size-Weight Illusion Induced Through Human Echolocation , 2015, Psychological science.

[20]  Devon Allcoat,et al.  Learning in virtual reality: Effects on performance, emotion and engagement , 2018, Research in Learning Technology.

[21]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size–weight illusion , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  D. Westwood,et al.  Opposite perceptual and sensorimotor responses to a size-weight illusion. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Gerard Jounghyun Kim,et al.  Size Perception of Augmented Objects by Different AR Displays , 2019, HCI.

[24]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  Augmented reality applications in rehabilitation to improve physical outcomes , 2012 .

[25]  G. Buckingham,et al.  Examining Whether Semantic Cues Can Affect Felt Heaviness When Lifting Novel Objects , 2020, Journal of cognition.

[26]  Ryan William Metcalfe,et al.  The size-weight illusion in a natural and augmented environment with congruent and incongruent size information , 2007 .

[27]  Marco Davare,et al.  Visual delay affects force scaling and weight perception during object lifting in virtual reality , 2019, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Dennis R. Proffitt,et al.  Making the Visual Tangible: Substituting Lifting Speed Limits for Object Weight in VR , 2018, PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality.

[30]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  The Size-Weight Illusion is not anti-Bayesian after all: a unifying Bayesian account , 2016, PeerJ.

[31]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  Measuring Presence in Augmented Reality Environments: Design and a First Test of a Questionnaire , 2021, ArXiv.

[32]  Eric L Amazeen,et al.  Sensory and perceptual interactions in weight perception , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  R. Johansson,et al.  Visual size cues in the programming of manipulative forces during precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  Elizabeth J. Saccone,et al.  Low-level sensory processes play a more crucial role than high-level cognitive ones in the size-weight illusion , 2019, PloS one.

[35]  G. Buckingham Getting a grip on heaviness perception: a review of weight illusions and their probable causes , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  Arindam Dey,et al.  A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014 , 2018, Front. Robot. AI.

[37]  G. Buckingham,et al.  The weight of expectation: Implicit, rather than explicit, prior expectations drive the size–weight illusion , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[38]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Size Matters: A Single Representation Underlies Our Perceptions of Heaviness in the Size-Weight Illusion , 2013, PloS one.