Business groups and product variety in trade: evidence from South Korea, Taiwan and Japan

Abstract We analyze the impact of market structure on the trade performance of South Korea, Taiwan and Japan. South Korea has many large, vertically-integrated business groups known as `chaebol', whereas business groups in Taiwan are smaller and more specialized in the production of intermediate inputs. We test the hypotheses that a greater presence of business groups leads to less product variety but higher product quality, using data on exports from these countries to the United States. We find that Taiwan tends to export a greater variety of products to the US than Korea, and this holds particularly for final goods. In addition, Taiwan exports higher-quality intermediate inputs, whereas Korea exports higher-quality final goods. A comparison with Japan is also presented, which has greater product variety in its sales to the US than either Taiwan or Korea, due to its larger size.

[1]  Tzu-Han Yang Industrial structure and trade patterns : evidence from South Korea and Taiwan , 1993 .

[2]  二木 雄策,et al.  Japanese enterprise groups , 1986 .

[3]  R. Feenstra,et al.  Testing Endogenous Growth in South Korea and Taiwan , 1997 .

[4]  J. Brander,et al.  Market structure and foreign trade , 1985 .

[5]  Ichiro Numazaki Networks of Taiwanese Big Business , 1986 .

[6]  James E. Rauch,et al.  Networks Versus Markets in International Trade , 1996 .

[7]  Gary R. Saxonhouse What Does Japanese Trade Structure Tell Us about Japanese Trade Policy , 1993 .

[8]  Mark J. Roberts,et al.  Measuring quality change in quota-constrained import markets: The Case of U.S. Footwear , 1986 .

[9]  J. Levinsohn,et al.  Product differentiation as a source of comparative advantage , 1993 .

[10]  D. Scharfstein,et al.  Corporate Structure, Liquidity, and Investment: Evidence from Japanese Industrial Groups , 1991 .

[11]  R. Feenstra U.S. Imports, 1972-1994: Data and Concordances , 1996 .

[12]  M. Aoki Toward an Economic Model of the Japanese Firm , 2013 .

[13]  D. Rodrik Industrial Organization and Product Quality: Evidence from South Korean and Taiwanese Exports , 1988 .

[14]  A. Pakes,et al.  Computing Markov Perfect Nash Equilibria: Numerical Implications of a Dynamic Differentiated Product Model , 1992 .

[15]  Christina L. Ahmadjian,et al.  Keiretsu Networks and Corporate Performance in Japan , 1996 .

[16]  R. Feenstra,et al.  Market Structure and International Trade: Business Groups in East Asia , 1993 .

[17]  S. Clegg,et al.  The Network Structures of East Asian Economies , 1990 .

[18]  Robert C. Feenstra,et al.  Empirical methods for international trade , 1988 .

[19]  Mark Granovetter,et al.  Coase Revisited: Business Groups in the Modern Economy , 1995 .

[20]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[21]  R. Eccles The Transfer Pricing Problem: A Theory for Practice , 1985 .

[22]  R. Gilson,et al.  Investment Companies as Guardian Shareholders: The Place of the MSIC in the Corporate Governance Debate , 1993 .

[23]  R. Feenstra,et al.  Business Groups and Trade in East Asia: Part 1, Networked Equilibria , 1997 .

[24]  R. Steers,et al.  The chaebol (Jaé Boĺ) : Korea's new industrial might , 1989 .

[25]  R. Baldwin Empirical Studies of Commercial Policy , 1991 .

[26]  Export behaviour with differentiated products: exports of Korea, Taiwan and Japan to the US domestic market , 1992 .

[27]  D. Scharfstein,et al.  The Role of Banks in Reducing the Costs of Financial Distress in Japan , 1990 .

[28]  M. Dagenais,et al.  International Trade Modelling , 1992 .

[29]  David E. Weinstein,et al.  Japan's Corporate Groups: Collusive or Competitive? An Empirical Investigation of Keiretsu Behavior , 1995 .

[30]  Ashoka Mody,et al.  Buyer-seller links in export development , 1992 .

[31]  K. Fung Characteristics of Japanese Industrial Groups and Their Potential Impact on U. S . - Japanese Trade , 1991 .

[32]  Eun Mee Kim The Industrial Organization and Growth of the Korean Chaebol: Integrating Development and Organizational Theories , 1996 .

[33]  J. Levinsohn,et al.  Monopolistic Competition and International Trade: Reconsidering the Evidence , 1993 .

[34]  Eun Mee Kim Contradictions and Limits of a Developmental State: With Illustrations from the South Korean Case , 1993 .

[35]  William J. Zeile Industrial Policy and Organizational Efficiency: The Korean Chaebol Examined , 1996 .

[36]  D. Friedman,et al.  International trade and the internal organization of firms: An evolutionary approach , 1996 .

[37]  Gerardo R. Ungson,et al.  The Chaebol : Korea's New Industrial Might , 1989 .

[38]  Ichiro Numazaki The Role of Personal Networks in the Making of Taiwan's Guanxiqiye (Related Enterprises) , 1996 .

[39]  Eun Mee Kim,et al.  Big Business, Strong State: Collusion and Conflict in South Korean Development, 1960-1990 , 1997 .

[40]  G. Hamilton Business networks and economic development in East and Southeast Asia , 1991 .

[41]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  Imperfect competition and international trade: Evidence from fourteen industrial countries , 1987 .

[42]  D. Davis,et al.  Intra-industry trade: A Heckscher-Ohlin-Ricardo approach , 1995 .

[43]  Robert Z. Lawrence Efficient or Exclusionist: The Import Behavior of Japanese Corporate Groups , 1991 .

[44]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Capitalism in contrasting cultures , 1990 .

[45]  Masahiko Aoki,et al.  The Japanese Main Bank System , 1995 .

[46]  Kazuo Sato The Ideal Log-Change Index Number , 1976 .

[47]  N. Smelser,et al.  Handbook of Economic Sociology , 1994 .

[48]  Paul Krugman,et al.  Empirical Studies of Strategic Trade Policy , 1994 .

[49]  G. Hamilton,et al.  Market, Culture, and Authority: A Comparative Analysis of Management and Organization in the Far East , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[50]  Anne Lohrli Chapman and Hall , 1985 .

[51]  R. Feenstra New Product Varieties and the Measurement of International Prices , 1994 .

[52]  Gary G. Hamilton,et al.  Patterns of Inter-Firm Control in Japanese Business* , 1989 .