Timed sequential induction chemotherapy and risk‐adapted postremission therapy for acute myelogenous leukemia

Cytogenetic analysis at the time of diagnosis predicts outcome in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). For those patients with favorable risk cytogenetics, stem cell transplant can be delayed until the time of relapse. For those patients with nonfavorable cytogenetic risk profiles, stem cell transplant may be required for optimal survival benefit. We treated patients with de novo AML and age less than 60 years first with etoposide, mitoxantrone, cytarabine, and G‐CSF (EMA‐G) to induce remission. Patients in complete remission were assigned to treatment with chemotherapy alone if they had favorable risk cytogenetics defined as the identification of a core‐binding factor translocation. Patients with any other cytogenetic profile were assigned to treatment with either autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplant depending on the availability of an HLA‐matched donor. Following EMA‐G, 33 of 40 patients (83%) achieved CR. Of the 25 patients who actually were treated with postremission chemotherapy, 21 were treated with their assigned risk‐adapted therapy. Of the 33 patients in remission, 5 year relapse‐free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was 46 and 38%, respectively. Our intensive and risk‐adapted, stem cell transplant approach to the treatment of patients with AML requires a better definition of risk and does not appear to substantially improve results compared with more standard approaches. Am. J. Hematol., 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  K. Mills,et al.  Clinical implications of gene expression profiling of acute myeloid leukemia , 2006, Current hematologic malignancy reports.

[2]  R. Hills,et al.  No evidence that FLT3 status should be considered as an indicator for transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): an analysis of 1135 patients, excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia, from the UK MRC AML10 and 12 trials. , 2005, Blood.

[3]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Sequential multiagent chemotherapy is not superior to high-dose cytarabine alone as postremission intensification therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in adults under 60 years of age: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 9222. , 2005, Blood.

[4]  J. Byrd,et al.  High-dose busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide does not improve outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation compared to BuCy2 in patients with acute myeloid leukemia , 2005, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[5]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Outcome of induction and postremission therapy in younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype: a cancer and leukemia group B study. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  J. Szer,et al.  A randomized trial of high-versus conventional-dose cytarabine in consolidation chemotherapy for adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia in first remission after induction therapy containing high-dose cytarabine. , 2005, Blood.

[7]  H. Dombret,et al.  Randomized comparison of double induction and timed-sequential induction to a "3 + 7" induction in adults with AML: long-term analysis of the Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA) 9000 study. , 2004, Blood.

[8]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Repetitive cycles of high-dose cytarabine benefit patients with acute myeloid leukemia and inv(16)(p13q22) or t(16;16)(p13;q22): results from CALGB 8461. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Augustin Ferrant,et al.  Effect of priming with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on the outcome of chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  S. Fröhling,et al.  Risk-adapted postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: results of the german multicenter AML HD93 treatment trial , 2003, Leukemia.

[12]  L. Rybicki,et al.  Timed-sequential chemotherapy with concomitant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for newly diagnosed de novo acute myelogenous leukemia , 2003, Leukemia.

[13]  A. Goldstone,et al.  The value of allogeneic bone marrow transplant in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia at differing risk of relapse: results of the UK MRC AML 10 trial , 2002, British journal of haematology.

[14]  M. Slovak,et al.  Karyotypic analysis predicts outcome of preremission and postremission therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study , 2000 .

[15]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Patients with t(8;21)(q22;q22) and acute myeloid leukemia have superior failure-free and overall survival when repetitive cycles of high-dose cytarabine are administered. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  F. Appelbaum,et al.  Chemotherapy compared with autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in the management of acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  K Wheatley,et al.  The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. The Medical Research Council Adult and Children's Leukaemia Working Parties. , 1998, Blood.

[18]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  All-trans-retinoic acid in acute promyelocytic leukemia. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  M. Kalaycio Inpatient management of acute leukemia. , 1997, Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine.

[20]  M. Grever,et al.  A randomized investigation of high-dose versus standard-dose cytosine arabinoside with daunorubicin in patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group study. , 1996, Blood.

[21]  O. Garson,et al.  A randomized study of high-dose cytarabine in induction in acute myeloid leukemia. , 1996, Blood.

[22]  Shaun Parsons,et al.  Improved survival for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  F. Mandelli,et al.  Autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation compared with intensive chemotherapy in acute myelogenous leukemia. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell'Adulto (GIMEMA) Leukemia Cooperative Groups. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  R. Mertelsmann,et al.  GM-CSF in a double-blind randomized, placebo controlled trial in therapy of adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). , 1995, Leukemia.

[25]  P. Fenaux,et al.  Timed sequential chemotherapy for previously treated patients with acute myeloid leukemia: long-term follow-up of the etoposide, mitoxantrone, and cytarabine-86 trial. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  R. Mayer,et al.  Intensive postremission chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer and Leukemia Group B. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  F. Mandelli,et al.  Mitoxantrone, etoposide, and intermediate-dose cytarabine: an effective and tolerable regimen for the treatment of refractory acute myeloid leukemia. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  P. Fenaux,et al.  Intensive sequential chemotherapy with mitoxantrone and continuous infusion etoposide and cytarabine for previously treated acute myelogenous leukemia. , 1991, Blood.

[29]  J. Matthews,et al.  Etoposide in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Australian Leukemia Study Group. , 1990, Blood.