Sanitizer Efficacy Against Attached Bacteria in a Milk Biofilm.

Pseudomonas fluorescens , Yersinia enterocolitica , and Listeria monocytogenes were shown to readily attach to both rubber and Teflon® surfaces. Sanitizer efficacy testing done in the laboratory with nonadherent bacteria could lead to false assumptions as to the sanitizer's true effectiveness under processing conditions where cells may be attached. The objectives in this study were: (a) evaluate the efficacy of in-use concentrations of sanitizers on bacteria attached to gasket materials, (b) compare bacterial attachment to rubber and Teflon® gaskets, (c) examine different methods of enumeration, and (d) compare sanitizer efficacy on attached and suspended bacteria. The goal reduction for all of the sanitizers tested was ≥3 log cycles or 99.9%. Results indicated that iodophor, hypochlorite, acid anionic, peroxyacetic acid, fatty acid, and quaternary ammonium sanitizers failed to provide an adequate reduction in the numbers of attached bacteria at levels of 104 to 105/mm2 in most cases. The test organisms attached in slightly higher numbers to the rubber surface versus Teflon®. Plate counts, impedance microbiology, and the direct epifluorescent filter technique were tested as methods of enumeration. Impedance microbiology was the best method of enumeration, since it allowed the estimation of both reversibly and irreversibly attached bacteria. The efficacy of sanitizers versus a bacterial suspensions resulted in a ≥ 5 log-cycle reduction. The same concentrations were relatively ineffective against the attached bacteria. The goal reduction was reached on the Teflon® surface with the iodophor, hypochlorite, and fatty acid sanitizers with a log-cycle reduction in the number of Yersinia enterocolitica of 3.09, 3.19, and 3.31, respectively. Pseudomonas fluorescens was reduced by 3.16 on both the rubber and Teflon® surfaces when exposed to the hypochlorite sanitizer.

[1]  H. William Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 13th ed. , 1980 .

[2]  J. Frank,et al.  Inactivation of Surface-adherent Listeria monocytogenes Hypochlorite and Heat. , 1991, Journal of food protection.

[3]  H. Carter,et al.  An outbreak of gastroenteritis caused by Salmonella indiana. , 1967, Public health reports.

[4]  R. Fontaine,et al.  Epidemic salmonellosis from cheddar cheese: surveillance and prevention. , 1980, American journal of epidemiology.

[5]  S. Ratnam,et al.  Laboratory studies on salmonella-contaminated cheese involved in a major outbreak of gastroenteritis. , 1986, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[6]  J. Liston,et al.  Low Temperature Growth of Salmonella , 1968 .

[7]  J. Costerton,et al.  Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. , 1987, Annual review of microbiology.

[8]  H. Beckers,et al.  Collaborative study on the isolation of salmonella from artificially contaminated milk powder. , 1985, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[9]  J. Goepfert,et al.  GROWTH OF SALMONELLA AT LOW pH , 1970 .

[10]  J W Costerton,et al.  How bacteria stick. , 1978, Scientific American.

[11]  M. Speck Control of Food-Borne Pathogens by Starter Cultures , 1972 .

[12]  A. Gilmour,et al.  Microflora associated with the internal surfaces of rubber and stainless steel milk transfer pipeline. , 1987, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[13]  E. H. Marth,et al.  Behavior of Salmonella typhimurium during manufacture and curing of cheddar cheese. , 1968, Applied microbiology.

[14]  G. Pettipher The direct epifluorescent filter technique for the rapid enumeration of micro-organisms. , 1983 .

[15]  C. White,et al.  Survival of Salmonella in Cheddar Cheese , 1976 .

[16]  P. M. Stanley,et al.  Factors affecting the irreversible attachment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to stainless steel. , 1983, Canadian journal of microbiology.

[17]  P. Koidis,et al.  Survival of Yersinia enterocolitica during the manufacture and storage of Feta cheese , 1985 .

[18]  E. H. Marth,et al.  Fate of Listeria monocytogenes during the Manufacture, Ripening and Storage of Feta Cheese. , 1989, Journal of food protection.

[19]  J W Costerton,et al.  The bacterial glycocalyx in nature and disease. , 1981, Annual review of microbiology.

[20]  Q. Myrvik,et al.  Adhesive colonization of biomaterials and antibiotic resistance. , 1987, Biomaterials.

[21]  Bacterial attachment to Buna-n gaskets in milk processing equipment. , 1990 .

[22]  J. Frank,et al.  Surface-adherent Growth of Listeria monocytogenes is Associated with Increased Resistance to Surfactant Sanitizers and Heat. , 1990, Journal of food protection.

[23]  R. Cleeland,et al.  Method of evaluating effects of antibiotics on bacterial biofilm , 1987, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[24]  James M. Jay,et al.  Modern food microbiology , 1970 .

[25]  E. A. Zottola,et al.  Effect of Cleaning and Sanitizing on the Attachment of Pseudomonas fragi to Stainless Steel , 1985 .

[26]  C. Wray,et al.  Reviews of the progress of dairy science: bovine salmonellosis. , 1977, The Journal of dairy research.

[27]  E. H. Marth Salmonellae and salmonellosis associated with milk and milk products. A review. , 1969, Journal of dairy science.

[28]  R. J. Hart,et al.  Campylobacter and Salmonella contamination of unpasteurized cows' milk on sale to the public. , 1988, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[29]  H. E. Rubin,et al.  Elucidation of the inhibitory factors of yogurt against Salmonella typhimurium. , 1979, Journal of dairy science.

[30]  P. Gaya,et al.  Behavior of Salmonellae During Manufacture and Ripening of Manchego Cheese. , 1982, Journal of food protection.

[31]  Sidney A. Williams,et al.  Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists , 1971, Soil Science Society of America Journal.

[32]  A. Curtis CELL CONTACT AND ADHESION * , 1962, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.