Why a brain capable of language evolved only once : Prefrontal cortex and symbol learning

. Language and information processes are critical issues in scientific controversies regarding the qualities that epitomize humanness. Whereas some theorists claim human mental uniqueness with regard to language, others point to successes in teaching language skills to other animals. However, although these animals may learn names for things, they show little ability to utilize a complex framework of symbolic reference. In such a framework, words or other symbols refer not only to objects and concepts but also to sequential and hierarchical relationships with other symbols. This process is essential to human mental operations, including language, mathematics, and music. In humans, these operations may have coevolved with the prefrontal area of the cerebral cortex, which is proportionately much larger in humans than in other animals and more intricately linked with other areas of the brain. Analysis of the structure and function of the prefrontal area suggests that it is centrally involved in the operation of higher-order associative relationships involving the subordination of one set of associations to another. This alternate learning strategy apparently appeared at the cost of certain sensory, motor, or limbic abilities. The payoff was symbolic thinking. Humans thus are unique among species, not just for their highly developed language ability but for their odd style of thinking and learning.

[1]  G A Ojemann,et al.  Individual variability in cortical localization of language. , 1979, Journal of neurosurgery.

[2]  M. Petrides Motor conditional associative-learning after selective prefrontal lesions in the monkey , 1982, Behavioural Brain Research.

[3]  D. Rumbaugh,et al.  Symbolization, language, and chimpanzees: A theoretical reevaluation based on initial language acquisition processes in four young Pan troglodytes , 1978, Brain and Language.

[4]  H. Barbas,et al.  Organization of afferent input to subdivisions of area 8 in the rhesus monkey , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  M. Petrides The effect of periarcuate lesions in the monkey on the performance of symmetrically and asymmetrically reinforced visual and auditory go, no- go tasks , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Petrides Deficits in non-spatial conditional associative learning after periarcuate lesions in the monkey , 1985, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  Terrence W. Deacon,et al.  The neural circuitry underlying primate calls and human language , 1989 .

[8]  T. Deacon Rethinking mammalian brain evolution , 1990 .

[9]  D. O'Leary Development of connectional diversity and specificity in the mammalian brain by the pruning of collateral projections , 1992, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[10]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Non-spatial memory after selective prefrontal lesions in monkeys , 1978, Brain Research.

[11]  R E Passingham Memory of monkeys (Macaca mulatta) with lesions in prefrontal cortex. , 1985, Behavioral neuroscience.

[12]  D. Rumbaugh,et al.  Reference: the linguistic essential. , 1980, Science.

[13]  R. Linden Control of neuronal survival by anomalous targets in the developing brain , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.