Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Development of Syllabus for Core Theoretical and Practical Competencies.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is dependent on the observer's competencies, and thus, appropriate education and testing of individual competency is essential. The current international curriculum in CEUS is methodologically weak and lacks validated competency assessment tests. In this study, we aimed to develop a syllabus for core competencies in CEUS using the Delphi process and an international panel of experts. A core writing group constructed an initial draft of the syllabus based on the existing literature. Eight international experts in CEUS or medical education were recruited as Delphi panelists. The draft underwent iterative and anonymous Delphi rounds until a pre-defined level of consensus was reached. The final syllabus consisted of 16 items, which were indexed in two main domains and in procedural order. An expert-generated proposal for a syllabus of core CEUS competencies has been constructed via the Delphi process and may serve as framework for future development of a CEUS curriculum, including competency assessment tests.

[1]  Timothy J. Wood,et al.  The Use of the Delphi and Other Consensus Group Methods in Medical Education Research: A Review , 2016, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[2]  Mirko D'Onofrio,et al.  The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017 (Long Version) , 2018, Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound.

[3]  Fabio Piscaglia,et al.  European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology , 2006 .

[4]  L Solbiati,et al.  Guidelines for the use of contrast agents in ultrasound. January 2004. , 2004, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[5]  F. Hasson,et al.  Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[6]  Ioan Sporea,et al.  How to perform Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) , 2018, Ultrasound international open.

[7]  N. Black,et al.  Consensus Development Methods: A Review of Best Practice in Creating Clinical Guidelines , 1999, Journal of health services research & policy.

[8]  M. D. de Villiers,et al.  The Delphi technique in health sciences education research , 2005, Medical teacher.

[9]  R. Hatala,et al.  A contemporary approach to validity arguments: a practical guide to Kane's framework , 2015, Medical education.

[10]  Emilio Quaia,et al.  Effect of Observer Experience in the Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Liver Tumors After Ultrasound Contrast Agent Injection , 2010, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[11]  C. Powell.  The Delphi technique: myths and realities. , 2003, Journal of advanced nursing.

[12]  Allan Luke,et al.  Curriculum and Syllabus Design , 2010 .

[13]  Chia-Chien Hsu,et al.  Minimizing Non-Response in The Delphi Process: How to Respond to Non-Response , 2007 .

[14]  R. Barr,et al.  How to Develop a Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound Program , 2017, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[15]  Christian Greis,et al.  Ultrasound contrast agents as markers of vascularity and microcirculation. , 2009, Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation.