Alternative Activity Pattern Generation for Stated Preference Surveys

We present a systematic method for generating activity-driven, multi-day alternative activity patterns that form choice sets for stated preference surveys. An activity pattern consists of information about an individual’s activity agenda, travel modes between activity episodes, and the location and duration of each episode. The proposed method adjusts an individual’s observed activity pattern using a hill-climbing algorithm, an iterative algorithm that finds local optima, to search for the best response to hypothetical system changes. The multi-day approach allows for flexibility to reschedule activities on different days and thus presents a more complete view of demand for activity participation, as these demands are rarely confined to a single day in reality. As a proof-of-concept, we apply the method to a multi-day activity-travel survey in Singapore and consider the hypothetical implementation of an on-demand autonomous vehicles service. The demonstration shows promising results, with the algorithm exhibiting overall desirable behavior with reasonable responses. In addition to representing the individual’s direct response, the use of observed patterns also reveals the propagation of impacts, that is, indirect effects, across the multi-day activity pattern.

[1]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Activity-based Travel Demand Analysis , 2011 .

[2]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Activity‐based approaches to travel analysis: conceptual frameworks, models, and research problems , 1992 .

[3]  Michael G. McNally,et al.  On the Structure of Weekly Activity/Travel Patterns , 2003 .

[4]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  ACTIVITY-BASED TRAVEL FORECASTING , 1997 .

[5]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  The Future Mobility Survey: Experiences in developing a smartphone-based travel survey in Singapore , 2013 .

[6]  Ta Theo Arentze,et al.  Experiences with developing ALBATROSS: a learning-based transportation oriented simulation system , 1998 .

[7]  T. Arentze,et al.  Modeling Individuals’ Activity-Travel Rescheduling Heuristics: Theory and Numerical Experiments , 2002 .

[8]  David Charypar,et al.  A Closer Look at Scoring , 2016 .

[9]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Activity rescheduling within a multi-agent transport simulation framework (MATSim) , 2016 .

[10]  Matthew J. Roorda,et al.  Prototype Model of Household Activity-Travel Scheduling , 2003 .

[11]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  Estimating non-linear utility functions of time use in the context of an activity schedule adaptation model , 2003 .

[12]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  SimMobility Mid-Term Simulator: A State of the Art Integrated Agent Based Demand and Supply Model , 2015 .

[13]  Ta Theo Arentze,et al.  Modeling Effects of Anticipated Time Pressure on Execution of Activity Programs , 2001 .

[14]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Future Mobility Survey , 2013 .

[15]  Matthew J. Roorda,et al.  Validation of TASHA: A 24-Hour Activity Scheduling Microsimulation Model , 2008 .

[16]  Wilfred W. Recker,et al.  The Household Activity Pattern Problem: General Formulation and Solution , 1995 .

[17]  Satoshi Fujii,et al.  TWO COMPUTATIONAL PROCESS MODELS OF ACTIVITY-TRAVEL BEHAVIOR1 , 1997 .

[18]  Sean T. Doherty,et al.  Household Activity Rescheduling in Response to Automobile Reduction Scenarios , 2002 .

[19]  Ta Theo Arentze,et al.  Implementation of a model of dynamic activity-travel rescheduling decisions: an agent-based micro-simulation framework , 2005 .

[20]  E. Miller,et al.  A computerized household activity scheduling survey , 2000 .