Accentuating the renewable energy exploitation: Evaluation of flexibility options

Abstract A global energy transition is currently happening mainly through the shift from conventional to renewable electricity resources in power energy systems. On this transition, the flexibility of the power grid complies a fundamental role to permit the full integration of renewables. Therefore, the purpose of this work is to develop a methodology that permits evaluating the current technological flexibility options available in power grids to exploit the integration of renewables fully. A Mixed Integer Linear Programming model is developed. The model incorporates pumped energy and battery storage systems, demand response, virtual power plant, and transmission-distribution energy transactions. The work is focused on the operation planning considering daily, weekly and seasonal factors regarding renewables and load patterns. The general results show, that all the flexibility options have the capacity to integrate, in a mayor extent, the renewable energy into the power grid. For example, from a base integration of 40.6% of renewable energy, all the flexi-options added an extra 27.1% of energy from RES. Suggesting, that the best option to integrate renewables is the incorporation of a diverse set of flexibility options. Interestingly, options like demand response and virtual power plant, presented the best renewables integration figures (17.9% and 6.9%) compared to options like energy storages (6.05% average). Therefore, it is strongly recommendable to analyze particularly options which, with plausible modifications and minor investment requirements, can offer a suitable flexibility capacity to the existent power grid. Finally, distribution-distribution or transmission-distribution energy transactions also have a great potential to diminish the renewable curtailment. For example, they permitted integrating an extra 13.9% and 93.53% respectively, for the full flexi-option.

[1]  Nouredine Hadjsaid,et al.  Storage as a flexibility option in power systems with high shares of variable renewable energy sources: a POLES-based analysis , 2017 .

[2]  P. Lombardi,et al.  Sharing economy as a new business model for energy storage systems , 2017 .

[3]  Carlos Silva,et al.  Demand response modeling: A comparison between tools , 2015 .

[4]  Pio Lombardi,et al.  Isolated power system in Russia: A chance for renewable energies? , 2016 .

[5]  Igor Kuzle,et al.  Low carbon technologies as providers of operational flexibility in future power systems , 2016, Applied Energy.

[6]  Hendrik Kondziella,et al.  Flexibility requirements of renewable energy based electricity systems – a review of research results and methodologies , 2016 .

[7]  Lion Hirth,et al.  The benefits of flexibility: The value of wind energy with hydropower , 2016 .

[8]  Raquel Segurado,et al.  Increasing the penetration of renewable energy resources in S. Vicente, Cape Verde , 2011 .

[9]  Mark Z. Jacobson,et al.  Flexibility mechanisms and pathways to a highly renewable US electricity future , 2016 .

[10]  Hans Christian Gils,et al.  Assessment of the theoretical demand response potential in Europe , 2014 .

[11]  Nadia Maïzi,et al.  Feasible path toward 40–100% renewable energy shares for power supply in France by 2050: A prospective analysis , 2016 .

[12]  Erik Delarue,et al.  Accounting for flexibility in power system planning with renewables , 2015 .

[13]  George Xydis,et al.  Comparison study between a Renewable Energy Supply System and a supergrid for achieving 100% from renewable energy sources in Islands , 2013 .

[14]  H. Rogner,et al.  Incorporating flexibility requirements into long-term energy system models – A case study on high levels of renewable electricity penetration in Ireland , 2014 .

[15]  Werner Römisch,et al.  Stochastic Lagrangian Relaxation Applied to Power Scheduling in a Hydro-Thermal System under Uncertainty , 2000, Ann. Oper. Res..

[16]  Goran Krajačić,et al.  How to achieve a 100% RES electricity supply for Portugal? , 2011 .

[17]  G. Papaefthymiou,et al.  Towards 100% renewable energy systems: Uncapping power system flexibility , 2016 .

[18]  Allen J. Wood,et al.  Power Generation, Operation, and Control , 1984 .

[19]  Samiha Tahseen,et al.  Deploying storage assets to facilitate variable renewable energy integration: The impacts of grid flexibility, renewable penetration, and market structure , 2018 .

[20]  Peter Lund,et al.  Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity , 2015 .

[21]  Przemyslaw Komarnicki,et al.  Energy storage systems: power grid and energy market use cases , 2016 .

[22]  F. Magnago,et al.  Impact of demand response resources on unit commitment and dispatch in a day-ahead electricity market , 2015 .

[23]  Pierluigi Siano,et al.  Flexibility in future power systems with high renewable penetration: A review , 2016 .