Angular sensitivity of blowfly photoreceptors: broadening by artificial electrical coupling

Summary1.Electrical coupling between R1–6 photoreceptors was investigated by measuring angular sensitivities and quantum bumps.2.Recordings were made from two extreme types of cells: Type a: cells with a diffraction-like angular sensitivity profile (see Smakman et al. 1984). Only large bumps could be obtained from these cells. Type b: cells with large, asymmetrical sidebands in the angular sensitivity profile. Large and small bumps could be recorded from these cells, specifically with off-axis illumination.3.The position of the small sidebands of the type a cells depends strongly on wavelength, as expected for a diffraction curve. The position of the large asymmetrical sidebands in the angular sensitivity profile of the type b cells was found to be independent of wavelength, indicating that these sidebands are not caused by the diffraction pattern of the facet lens.4.The angular position of the large asymmetrical sidebands corresponds with the position of neighbouring photoreceptors, suggesting electrical interactions between R1–6 photoreceptors.5.The dependence of this electrical coupling on microelectrode properties was investigated. It was possible to change the degree of electrical coupling by selection of electrodes.6.The difference in properties of the two cell types encountered are interpreted as an indication that some R1–6 photoreceptors are artificially electrically coupled while others are not. The correlation of the electrical coupling with electrode types and the possible artificial origins of coupling are discussed.

[1]  Dominicus Gerhardus Maria Beersma Spatial characteristics of the visual field of flies , 1979 .

[2]  K. Mimura Receptive field patterns in photoreceptors of the fly , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[3]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[4]  S. R. Shaw,et al.  Simultaneous recording from two cells in the locust retina , 1967, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[5]  S. Shaw Early visual processing in insects. , 1984, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  J. H. van Hateren,et al.  Angular sensitivity of blowfly photoreceptors: intracellular measurements and wave-optical predictions , 1984, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  F. E. Doujak Electrophysiological measurement of photoreceptor membrane dichroism and polarization sensitivity in a Grapsid crab , 1984, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[8]  R. Menzel,et al.  Colour receptors in the bee eye — Morphology and spectral sensitivity , 1976, Journal of comparative physiology.

[9]  A. Dubs The spatial integration of signals in the retina and lamina of the fly compound eye under different conditions of luminance , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[10]  B. A. Pijpker,et al.  An analog-digital feedback system for measuring photoreceptor properties with an equal response method , 1983, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  D. G. Stavenga,et al.  On optical crosstalk between fly rhabdomeres , 1975, Biological Cybernetics.

[12]  Keiichi Mimura Electrophysiological evidence for interaction between retinula cells in the flesh-fly , 1978, Journal of comparative physiology.

[13]  S. R. Shaw,et al.  Interreceptor coupling in ommatidia of drone honeybee and locust compound eyes. , 1969, Vision research.

[14]  S B Laughlin,et al.  Single photon signals in fly photoreceptors and first order interneurones at behavioral threshold. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  K. Brown,et al.  New microelectrode techniques for intracellular work in small cells , 1977, Neuroscience.

[16]  G. Horridge,et al.  Single electrode studies on the retina of the butterflyPapilio , 1983, Journal of comparative physiology.

[17]  K. Kirschfeld,et al.  Die projektion der optischen umwelt auf das raster der rhabdomere im komplexauge von Musca , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  V. J. Wulff,et al.  Light-Initiated Responses of Retinula and Eccentric Cells in the Limulus Lateral Eye , 1965, The Journal of general physiology.

[19]  W. J. Bell,et al.  Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology , 1985 .

[20]  G. D. Bernard,et al.  Intracellular optical physiology of the bee's eye , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[21]  J. H. van Hateren,et al.  Electrical coupling of neuro-ommatidial photoreceptor cells in the blowfly , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[22]  Photoreceptor optics II: Application to angular sensitivity and other properties of a lens-photoreceptor system , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[23]  G. D. Bernard,et al.  Intracellular optical physiology of the bee's eye , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[24]  P. Lillywhite,et al.  Coupling between locust photoreceptors revealed by a study of quantum bumps , 1978, Journal of comparative physiology.

[25]  K. Kirschfeld,et al.  Ein Mechanismus zur Steuerung des Lichtflusses in den Rhabdomeren des Komplexauges von Musca , 1969, Kybernetik.

[26]  J. Howard Variations in the voltage response to single quanta of light in the photoreceptors of Locusta Migratoria , 1983, Biophysics of structure and mechanism.