RNA force field with accuracy comparable to state-of-the-art protein force fields

Significance The complex and often highly dynamic 3D structures of RNA molecules are central to their diverse cellular functions. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have played a major role in characterizing the structure and dynamics of proteins, but the physical models (“force fields”) used for simulating nucleic acids are substantially less accurate overall than those used in protein simulations, creating a major challenge for MD studies of RNA. Here, we report an RNA force field capable of describing the structural and thermodynamic properties of RNA molecules with accuracy comparable to state-of-the-art protein force fields. This force field should facilitate the use of MD simulation as a tool for the study of biologically significant RNA molecules and protein–RNA complexes. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation has become a powerful tool for characterizing at an atomic level of detail the conformational changes undergone by proteins. The application of such simulations to RNA structures, however, has proven more challenging, due in large part to the fact that the physical models (“force fields”) available for MD simulations of RNA molecules are substantially less accurate in many respects than those currently available for proteins. Here, we introduce an extensive revision of a widely used RNA force field in which the parameters have been modified, based on quantum mechanical calculations and existing experimental information, to more accurately reflect the fundamental forces that stabilize RNA structures. We evaluate these revised parameters through long-timescale MD simulations of a set of RNA molecules that covers a wide range of structural complexity, including single-stranded RNAs, RNA duplexes, RNA hairpins, and riboswitches. The structural and thermodynamic properties measured in these simulations exhibited dramatically improved agreement with experimentally determined values. Based on the comparisons we performed, this RNA force field appears to achieve a level of accuracy comparable to that of state-of-the-art protein force fields, thus significantly advancing the utility of MD simulation as a tool for elucidating the structural dynamics and function of RNA molecules and RNA-containing biological assemblies.

[1]  M. Lipsett EVIDENCE FOR HELICAL STRUCTURE IN POLYURIDYLIC ACID. , 1960, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  M. Leng,et al.  A study of polyuridylic acid. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  W. L. Jorgensen Quantum and statistical mechanical studies of liquids. 10. Transferable intermolecular potential functions for water, alcohols, and ethers. Application to liquid water , 2002 .

[4]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Quantum and statistical mechanical studies of liquids. Part 22. Pressure dependence of mixing enantiomeric liquids: 1,2-dichloropropane , 1982 .

[5]  R. Stolarski,et al.  Studies on the dynamic syn-anti equilibrium in purine nucleosides and nucleotides with the aid of 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy. , 1984, European journal of biochemistry.

[6]  S. Nosé A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods , 1984 .

[7]  Hoover,et al.  Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[8]  H. G. Petersen,et al.  Error estimates on averages of correlated data , 1989 .

[9]  F. Seela,et al.  Syn-anti conformational analysis of regular and modified nucleosides by 1D 1H NOE difference spectroscopy: a simple graphical method based on conformationally rigid molecules , 1990 .

[10]  G. Parisi,et al.  Simulated tempering: a new Monte Carlo scheme , 1992, hep-lat/9205018.

[11]  A. Klamt,et al.  COSMO : a new approach to dielectric screening in solvents with explicit expressions for the screening energy and its gradient , 1993 .

[12]  M. Klein,et al.  Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms , 1994 .

[13]  A. Tamura,et al.  Significant discrepancies between van't Hoff and calorimetric enthalpies. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .

[15]  J. Šponer,et al.  MP2 and CCSD(T) study on hydrogen bonding, aromatic stacking and nonaromatic stacking , 1997 .

[16]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[17]  D. Turner,et al.  Thermodynamic parameters for an expanded nearest-neighbor model for formation of RNA duplexes with Watson-Crick base pairs. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[18]  Frederick R. Manby,et al.  Fast linear scaling second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) using local and density fitting approximations , 2003 .

[19]  P. Nygaard,et al.  Definition of a Second Bacillus subtilis pur Regulon Comprising the pur and xpt-pbuX Operons plus pbuG, nupG (yxjA), and pbuE (ydhL) , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[20]  A. Serganov,et al.  Structural basis for discriminative regulation of gene expression by adenine- and guanine-sensing mRNAs. , 2004, Chemistry & biology.

[21]  R. Montange,et al.  Structure of a natural guanine-responsive riboswitch complexed with the metabolite hypoxanthine , 2004, Nature.

[22]  Kevin Cowtan,et al.  research papers Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2005 .

[23]  William L Jorgensen,et al.  Halide, Ammonium, and Alkali Metal Ion Parameters for Modeling Aqueous Solutions. , 2006, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[24]  R. Montange,et al.  Structure of the S-adenosylmethionine riboswitch regulatory mRNA element , 2006, Nature.

[25]  R. Batey,et al.  Thermodynamic and kinetic characterization of ligand binding to the purine riboswitch aptamer domain. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  Federico D. Sacerdoti,et al.  Scalable Algorithms for Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Commodity Clusters , 2006, ACM/IEEE SC 2006 Conference (SC'06).

[27]  R. Pappu,et al.  Parameters of monovalent ions in the AMBER-99 forcefield: assessment of inaccuracies and proposed improvements. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[28]  J. Šponer,et al.  Refinement of the AMBER Force Field for Nucleic Acids: Improving the Description of α/γ Conformers , 2007 .

[29]  R. Batey,et al.  Ligand-dependent folding of the three-way junction in the purine riboswitch. , 2008, RNA.

[30]  T. Cheatham,et al.  Determination of Alkali and Halide Monovalent Ion Parameters for Use in Explicitly Solvated Biomolecular Simulations , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[31]  G. Hummer,et al.  Are current molecular dynamics force fields too helical? , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[32]  J. Šponer,et al.  Balance of Attraction and Repulsion in Nucleic-Acid Base Stacking: CCSD(T)/Complete-Basis-Set-Limit Calculations on Uracil Dimer and a Comparison with the Force-Field Description. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[33]  John L. Klepeis,et al.  Millisecond-scale molecular dynamics simulations on Anton , 2009, Proceedings of the Conference on High Performance Computing Networking, Storage and Analysis.

[34]  Amber R. Davis,et al.  Thermodynamic characterization of naturally occurring RNA tetraloops. , 2010, RNA.

[35]  R. Montange,et al.  Free state conformational sampling of the SAM-I riboswitch aptamer domain. , 2010, Structure.

[36]  Harry A. Stern,et al.  Reparameterization of RNA χ Torsion Parameters for the AMBER Force Field and Comparison to NMR Spectra for Cytidine and Uridine , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[37]  R. Dror,et al.  Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field , 2010, Proteins.

[38]  Daniel Svozil,et al.  Reference MP2/CBS and CCSD(T) quantum-chemical calculations on stacked adenine dimers. Comparison with DFT-D, MP2.5, SCS(MI)-MP2, M06-2X, CBS(SCS-D) and force field descriptions. , 2010, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[39]  D. Turner,et al.  Benchmarking AMBER Force Fields for RNA: Comparisons to NMR Spectra for Single-Stranded r(GACC) Are Improved by Revised χ Torsions , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[40]  Eric T. Kim,et al.  How does a drug molecule find its target binding site? , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[41]  W. Webb,et al.  Ionic strength-dependent persistence lengths of single-stranded RNA and DNA , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  R. Dror,et al.  How Fast-Folding Proteins Fold , 2011, Science.

[43]  J. Šponer,et al.  Refinement of the Cornell et al. Nucleic Acids Force Field Based on Reference Quantum Chemical Calculations of Glycosidic Torsion Profiles , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[44]  Andrea L Edwards,et al.  Riboswitches: structures and mechanisms. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[45]  Daniel Svozil,et al.  Can We Accurately Describe the Structure of Adenine Tracts in B-DNA? Reference Quantum-Chemical Computations Reveal Overstabilization of Stacking by Molecular Mechanics. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[46]  J. P. Grossman,et al.  Biomolecular simulation: a computational microscope for molecular biology. , 2012, Annual review of biophysics.

[47]  R. Breaker Riboswitches and the RNA world. , 2012, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[48]  D. Case,et al.  Revised AMBER parameters for bioorganic phosphates. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[49]  Lennart Nilsson,et al.  Magnesium Ion-Water Coordination and Exchange in Biomolecular Simulations. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[50]  Martin Schütz,et al.  Molpro: a general‐purpose quantum chemistry program package , 2012 .

[51]  Rhiju Das,et al.  Are Protein Force Fields Getting Better? A Systematic Benchmark on 524 Diverse NMR Measurements. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[52]  Diwakar Shukla,et al.  To milliseconds and beyond: challenges in the simulation of protein folding. , 2013, Current opinion in structural biology.

[53]  John A Tainer,et al.  Accurate SAXS profile computation and its assessment by contrast variation experiments. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[54]  Michal Otyepka,et al.  Computer Folding of RNA Tetraloops? Are We There Yet? , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[55]  Angel E García,et al.  High-resolution reversible folding of hyperstable RNA tetraloops using molecular dynamics simulations , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  D. Turner,et al.  The Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of CCCC RNA Reveals a Right-Handed Helix, and Revised Parameters for AMBER Force Field Torsions Improve Structural Predictions from Molecular Dynamics , 2013, Biochemistry.

[57]  Jing Huang,et al.  CHARMM36 all‐atom additive protein force field: Validation based on comparison to NMR data , 2013, J. Comput. Chem..

[58]  Niel M. Henriksen,et al.  Reliable oligonucleotide conformational ensemble generation in explicit solvent for force field assessment using reservoir replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[59]  Saeed Izadi,et al.  Building Water Models: A Different Approach , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[60]  Michal Otyepka,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Nucleic Acids. From Tetranucleotides to the Ribosome. , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[61]  Adrian E. Roitberg,et al.  Multidimensional Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Yields a Converged Ensemble of an RNA Tetranucleotide , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[62]  Stefano Piana,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of physical models used in protein-folding simulations: quantitative evidence from long molecular dynamics simulations. , 2014, Current opinion in structural biology.

[63]  F. Jiang,et al.  Residue-specific force field based on the protein coil library. RSFF1: modification of OPLS-AA/L. , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[64]  C. Brooks,et al.  Hierarchy of RNA functional dynamics. , 2014, Annual review of biochemistry.

[65]  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of 441 Two-Residue Peptides in Aqueous Solution: Conformational Preferences and Neighboring Residue Effects with the Amber ff99SB-ildn-NMR Force Field. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[66]  A. Elcock,et al.  Large-Scale Analysis of 48 DNA and 48 RNA Tetranucleotides Studied by 1 μs Explicit-Solvent Molecular Dynamics Simulations. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[67]  H. Bussemaker,et al.  DSSR: an integrated software tool for dissecting the spatial structure of RNA , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[68]  D. Turner,et al.  Stacking in RNA: NMR of Four Tetramers Benchmark Molecular Dynamics , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[69]  C. Simmerling,et al.  ff14SB: Improving the Accuracy of Protein Side Chain and Backbone Parameters from ff99SB. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[70]  Paul Robustelli,et al.  Water dispersion interactions strongly influence simulated structural properties of disordered protein states. , 2015, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[71]  D. Svergun,et al.  Kirkwood-Buff Approach Rescues Overcollapse of a Disordered Protein in Canonical Protein Force Fields. , 2015, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[72]  Thomas E Cheatham,et al.  Improved Force Field Parameters Lead to a Better Description of RNA Structure. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[73]  Niel M. Henriksen,et al.  Highly sampled tetranucleotide and tetraloop motifs enable evaluation of common RNA force fields , 2015, RNA.

[74]  Giovanni Bussi,et al.  Empirical Corrections to the Amber RNA Force Field with Target Metadynamics , 2016, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[75]  D. Case,et al.  PARMBSC1: A REFINED FORCE-FIELD FOR DNA SIMULATIONS , 2015, Nature Methods.

[76]  Stefano Piana,et al.  Demonstrating an Order-of-Magnitude Sampling Enhancement in Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Complex Protein Systems. , 2016, Journal of chemical theory and computation.