NON-INVASIVE ANGIOGRAPHY Original Studies Coronary Stent Assessability by 64 Slice Multi-Detector Computed Tomography

Background: We evaluated the assessability of contemporary stent platforms by 64‐slice multi‐detector computed tomography (MDCT). Methods. Patients undergoing coronary stenting were included in a prospective protocol of MDCT imaging within 48 hr of stent implantation. MDCT data were acquired using a “Sensation 64” MDCT scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany). Stent assessability was assessed by two independent blinded observers and disagreement was resolved by a third observer. Assessability was defined at visualization of the in‐stent lumen without influence of partial volume effects, beam hardening, motion, calcification, or contrast to noise limitations. Results: Fifty four stents (Cypher n = 25, Vision/Minivision n = 19, Taxus Express n = 8, Liberte n = 1, Driver n = 1) in 44 patients were included in the study. The two independent observers classified 30 of 54 stents (56%) as assessable. Interobserver reproducibility was good with κ = 0.66. Stent size was the most important determinant of assessability. Consistently assessable stents were 3.0 mm or larger (85%), whereas those under 3 mm were mostly nonassessable (26%).Conclusions: Contemporary stent designs evaluated on a 64‐slice MDCT scanner showed artifact free assessability only in larger stents. Increase in spatial resolution of MDCT scanners or modifications in stent design will be necessary to noninvasive evaluate stents <3 mm in diameter, where in‐stent restenosis is more frequent. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  J. Blanc,et al.  Assessment of coronary artery stents by 16 slice computed tomography , 2005, Heart.

[2]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Assessment of coronary artery stents using 16-slice MDCT angiography: evaluation of a dedicated reconstruction kernel and a noise reduction filter , 2005, European Radiology.

[3]  W. Heindel,et al.  64- Versus 16-Slice CT Angiography for Coronary Artery Stent Assessment: In Vitro Experience , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[4]  J. Moses,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Angiographic Restenosis After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in Native Coronary Arteries , 2004, Circulation.

[5]  S. Yusuf,et al.  The risks of waiting for cardiac catheterization: a prospective study. , 2002, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[6]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Usefulness of multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  Gilles Rioufol,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of left main coronary stent patency with 16-slice computed tomography. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents , 2006, European Radiology.

[9]  Mary E. Russell,et al.  Comparison of a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent with a bare metal stent in patients with complex coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005 .

[10]  T. Fujii,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary stents in patients by 16-slice computed tomography. , 2006, International journal of cardiology.

[11]  W. B. Meijboom,et al.  Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography for the Evaluation of Stent Patency After Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting: A Comparison With Conventional Coronary Angiography and Intravascular Ultrasound , 2006, Circulation.

[12]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  B. Lewis,et al.  Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.