Trends and inequities in colorectal cancer screening participation in Ontario, Canada, 2005-2011.

BACKGROUND Participation in screening tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) is generally low in Ontario, Canada. In addition, inequities in participation exist including lower participation among low-income individuals, males and individuals living in rural areas. In April 2008, Colon Cancer Check (CCC) program, the province-wide CRC screening program, was launched in Ontario. This study describes the trends and inequities in CRC screening participation three years before and three years after the CCC, and assesses the effect of the program on CRC screening participation, overall and among certain population groups. METHODS We used administrative data to identify cohorts of individuals eligible for CRC screening in fiscal years 2005-2011. We calculated the age-standardized percent of Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) participation, large bowel endoscopy participation, and being 'up-to-date' with CRC screening tests. RESULTS From 2005 to 2011, FOBT participation increased from 7.6% to 14.8%, large bowel endoscopy participation from 3.4% to 5.7%, and 'up-to-date' with CRC screening from 27.2% to 41.3%. Before the launch of the CCC program, the quarterly increase in FOBT participation was 0.07% (p=0.19), increased immediately after the launch (1.8%, p<0.01), followed by a decline (-0.08%, p=0.08), returning to its pre-program increase rate. We noted a significant decrease in FOBT participation every summer (-0.44%, p<0.01). The CCC program had minimal effect on large bowel endoscopy participation. Before the launch of the CCC program, the quarterly increase in 'up-to-date' with CRC screening was 0.9% (p<0.01), increased immediately after the launch (2.5%, p=0.05), followed by a modest decline thereafter (-0.59%, p<0.02). From 2005 to 2011, recent residents living in low-income neighborhoods were consistently and significantly less likely to have a FOBT and be 'up-to-date' with CRC screening than long-term residents living in high-income neighborhoods (2.9-4.5%; 14.7-17.3% respectively). Pre-CCC inequities in CRC participation persisted after the launch of the program. CONCLUSION CRC testing was increasing in Ontario from 2005. An immediate increase in CRC testing, FOBT in particular, occurred after the launch of the CCC program, followed by a return to its pre-CCC increase rate thereafter. Future efforts are needed to improve screening participation and address inequities.

[1]  H. Bryant,et al.  Perception versus reality: overcoming barriers to colorectal cancer screening. , 2008, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[2]  C. von Wagner,et al.  Socioeconomic inequalities in colorectal cancer screening uptake: does time perspective play a role? , 2011, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[3]  J. Holtrop,et al.  The Patient-Centered Medical Home and Why It Matters to Health Educators , 2010, Health promotion practice.

[4]  C. von Wagner,et al.  Inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation in the first round of the national screening programme in England , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  L M Schuman,et al.  Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  L. Rabeneck,et al.  A qualitative evaluation of strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening uptake. , 2011, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[7]  T. Perneger,et al.  Cancer screening in a middle-aged general population: factors associated with practices and attitudes , 2009, BMC public health.

[8]  N. Shokar,et al.  Factors associated with a physician's recommendation for colorectal cancer screening in a diverse population. , 2009, Family medicine.

[9]  D. Weller,et al.  Uptake in cancer screening programmes: a priority in cancer control , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  S. Derksen,et al.  Assessing ecologic proxies for household income: a comparison of household and neighbourhood level income measures in the study of population health status. , 1999, Health & place.

[11]  Charles J. Kahi,et al.  Effect of screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. , 2009, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[12]  J. Borrás,et al.  Lessons learnt from a population-based pilot programme for colorectal cancer screening in Catalonia (Spain) , 2007, Journal of medical screening.

[13]  L. Rabeneck,et al.  Association between subject factors and colorectal cancer screening participation in Ontario, Canada. , 2005, Cancer detection and prevention.

[14]  A. Jerant,et al.  Physician Counseling for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Impact on Patient Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behavior , 2011, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[15]  R. Hunt,et al.  Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the Canadian Digestive Health Foundation: Guidelines on colon cancer screening. , 2004, Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie.

[16]  J. Blay,et al.  Impact of organised programs on colorectal cancer screening , 2008, BMC Cancer.

[17]  L D Marrett,et al.  An application of capture-recapture methods to the estimation of completeness of cancer registration. , 1988, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  C. von Wagner,et al.  Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests , 2010, Gut.

[19]  Cancer,et al.  Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[20]  Yeonju Kim,et al.  Overview of the National Cancer screening programme and the cancer screening status in Korea. , 2011, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[21]  J. Olsen,et al.  Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test , 1996, The Lancet.

[22]  A K Wagner,et al.  Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research , 2002, Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics.

[23]  Martin Fortin,et al.  Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care , 2012 .

[24]  Robert Enns,et al.  Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position statement on screening individuals at average risk for developing colorectal cancer: 2010. , 2010, Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie.

[25]  V. Bouvier,et al.  Socioeconomic determinants for compliance to colorectal cancer screening. A multilevel analysis , 2009, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[26]  Leila C. Kahwati,et al.  Colorectal Cancer Testing in the National Veterans Health Administration , 2012, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[27]  J. Austoker,et al.  Improving the quality of communication in organised cervical cancer screening programmes. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[28]  J. Spinelli,et al.  Childhood Leukemia and Socioeconomic Status in Canada , 2005, Epidemiology.

[29]  B. Levy,et al.  Perceptions of Iowa Family Physicians Regarding Colorectal Cancer Screening , 2008, Medical care.

[30]  C. von Wagner,et al.  Inequalities in participation in an organized national colorectal cancer screening programme: results from the first 2.6 million invitations in England. , 2011, International journal of epidemiology.

[31]  R. Moineddin,et al.  Inadequacy of cervical cancer screening among urban recent immigrants: a population-based study of physician and laboratory claims in Toronto, Canada. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[32]  V. Plessis,et al.  DEFINITIONS OF RURAL , 2002 .

[33]  B. Levy,et al.  Why Hasn't This Patient Been Screened for Colon Cancer? An Iowa Research Network Study , 2007, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[34]  H. Brenner,et al.  Potential for Colorectal Cancer Prevention of Sigmoidoscopy Versus Colonoscopy: Population-Based Case Control Study , 2007, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[35]  P. Nutting,et al.  Competing demands in the office visit: what influences mammography recommendations? , 2001, The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice.

[36]  A. Kopp,et al.  Capitation and enhanced fee-for-service models for primary care reform: a population-based evaluation , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[37]  S Greenland,et al.  Ecological bias, confounding, and effect modification. , 1989, International journal of epidemiology.

[38]  H. Beydoun,et al.  Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States , 2008, Cancer Causes & Control.

[39]  R. Epstein,et al.  So much to do, so little time: care for the socially disadvantaged and the 15-minute visit. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[40]  Mark P Purdue,et al.  Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  S. Lemon,et al.  Colorectal cancer screening participation: comparisons with mammography and prostate-specific antigen screening. , 2001, American journal of public health.

[42]  J. Escarce,et al.  Use of geocoding in managed care settings to identify quality disparities. , 2005, Health affairs.

[43]  S. Moss,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer , 1989, The Lancet.

[44]  B. Denis,et al.  Short term outcomes of the first round of a pilot colorectal cancer screening programme with guaiac based faecal occult blood test , 2007, Gut.