Transforming a Middle and High School Robotics Curriculum

This paper will examine a robotics curriculum that is impacting educators and youth in both formal, middle and high school classrooms as well as in a variety of informal learning environments. We have made comparisons between formal and informal learning environments in an effort to understand the varying impacts of this novel program on student learning of science concepts, their skills and abilities in applying engineering design and problem-solving, and their awareness and interest in engineering careers and the individuals who pursue these careers. Data from teachers, informal educators and youth during the second year of project implementation suggest that strategies designed to improve the experience and learning of participants in informal learning environments ultimately improve the enjoyment, content learning, STEM interest and engagement of students in both informal and formal environments.

[1]  K. Crowley,et al.  The Robotic Autonomy Mobile Robotics Course: Robot Design, Curriculum Design and Educational Assessment , 2005, Auton. Robots.

[2]  The Effect of an After-School Program Addressing the Gender and Minority Achievement Gaps in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering. , 2001 .

[3]  R. Marx,et al.  Design‐based science and student learning , 2004 .

[4]  Matthew M. Mehalik,et al.  Middle‐School Science Through Design‐Based Learning versus Scripted Inquiry: Better Overall Science Concept Learning and Equity Gap Reduction , 2008 .

[5]  Gwen Nugent,et al.  The Effect of 4-H Robotics and Geospatial Technologies on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning and Attitudes , 2008 .

[6]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Problem-Based Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classroom: Putting Learning by Design(tm) Into Practice , 2003 .

[7]  Mercedes McKay,et al.  Robots Underwater! Learning Science, Engineering and 21st Century Skills: The Evolution of Curricula, Professional Development and Research in Formal and Informal Contexts , 2012 .

[8]  Susan Lowes,et al.  AC 2009-492: ANALYSIS OF MIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT LEARNING OF SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS AND ENGINEERING CONCEPTS THROUGH A LEGO UNDERWATER ROBOTICS DESIGN CHALLENGE , 2009 .

[9]  P King Kathleen,et al.  Classroom Robotics: Case Stories of 21st Century Instruction for Millenial Students , 2007 .

[10]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Designing to Learn About Complex Systems , 2000 .

[11]  L. Rennie,et al.  Teachers' implementation of gender-inclusive instructional strategies in single-sex and mixed-sex science classrooms , 2002 .