Energy balance and global warming potential of biogas-based fuels from a life cycle perspective

Biogas is a multifunctional energy carrier currently used for co-generation or compressed biomethane as vehicle fuel. Gas-to-liquid (GTL) technology enables conversion of biogas into other energy carriers with higher energy density, facilitating fuel distribution. The energy efficiency and global warming potential (GWP) for conversion of biogas to compressed biogas (CBG), liquefied biogas (LBG), Fischer–Tropsch diesel (FTD), methanol and dimethyl ether (DME) were studied in a life cycle perspective covering the technical system from raw biogas to use in city buses. CBG, methanol and DME showed the best specific fuel productivity. However, when fuel distribution distances were longer, DME, LBG and methanol showed the best energy balance. Methanol, FTD and DME emitted half the GWP of LBG and CBG. Choice of electricity mix had a large impact on GWP performance. Overall, taking into account the different impact categories, combustion properties and fuel yield from raw biogas, DME showed the best performance of the fuel conversion scenarios assessed. (Less)

[1]  A. Tillman,et al.  The hitch hiker's guide to LCA (Life Cycle Assessment): an orientation in Life Cycle Assessment methodology and application , 2004 .

[2]  James J Winebrake,et al.  Total Fuel-Cycle Analysis of Heavy-Duty Vehicles Using Biofuels and Natural Gas-Based Alternative Fuels , 2011, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[3]  Anoop Singh,et al.  Production of liquid biofuels from renewable resources , 2011 .

[4]  R. Borup,et al.  Dimethyl ether (DME) as an alternative fuel , 2006 .

[5]  R. Betts,et al.  Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Chapter 2 , 2007 .

[6]  Rafael Moliner,et al.  Catalytic decomposition of biogas to produce H2-rich fuel gas and carbon nanofibers. Parametric study and characterization , 2012 .

[7]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Allocation issues in LCA methodology: a case study of corn stover-based fuel ethanol , 2009 .

[8]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Lights and shadows in consequential LCA , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[9]  Lawrence L. Kupper,et al.  Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers , 1970 .

[10]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  K. A. Subramanian,et al.  Alternative Transportation Fuels: Utilisation in Combustion Engines , 2013 .

[12]  Sean P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Scale-Up of Microchannel Reactors For Fischer—Tropsch Synthesis , 2010 .

[13]  Vincent Mahieu,et al.  Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the european context , 2004 .

[14]  Frerich J. Keil,et al.  Methanol-to-hydrocarbons: process technology , 1999 .

[15]  Thore Berntsson,et al.  Energy efficient upgrading of biofuel integrated with a pulp mill , 2003 .

[16]  P Mostbauer,et al.  Climate balance of biogas upgrading systems. , 2010, Waste management.

[17]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part II: The environmental impact of replacing various reference systems , 2007 .

[18]  Henrikke Baumann,et al.  The hitch hiker's guide to LCA : an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application , 2004 .

[19]  A. Demirbas,et al.  Biodiesel production from vegetable oils via catalytic and non-catalytic supercritical methanol transesterification methods , 2005 .

[20]  A. Faaij,et al.  Fischer–Tropsch diesel production in a well-to-wheel perspective: a carbon, energy flow and cost analysis , 2009 .

[21]  Carl-Erik Grip,et al.  Methanol production from steel-work off-gases and biomass based synthesis gas , 2013 .

[22]  Shane Ward,et al.  Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways , 2010 .

[23]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part I: Fuel-cycle emissions , 2006 .

[24]  Tim Patterson,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biogas infrastructure options on a regional scale. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[25]  M. Yamada.  High-Quality Transportation Fuels , 2003 .

[26]  Anders Åsblad,et al.  Synergies from combined pulp&paper and fuel production , 2012 .

[27]  Shenghua Liu,et al.  Study of spark ignition engine fueled with methanol/gasoline fuel blends , 2007 .

[28]  G. Ertl,et al.  Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis , 1997 .

[29]  José Rodríguez-Fernández,et al.  Combustion characteristics and emissions of FischerTropsch diesel fuels in IC engines , 2011 .

[30]  M. Dry,et al.  The Fischer–Tropsch process: 1950–2000 , 2002 .

[31]  D. Elliott,et al.  Conversion of Biomass Syngas to DME Using a Microchannel Reactor , 2005 .

[32]  Nils-Olof Nylund,et al.  Fuel and Technology Alternatives for Buses: Overall Energy Efficiency and Emission Performance , 2012 .

[33]  Fredric Bauer,et al.  Biogas upgrading - Review of commercial technologies , 2013 .

[34]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[35]  Charles N. Satterfield,et al.  Heterogeneous catalysis in industrial practice , 1991 .

[36]  Bin Yang,et al.  Improved Fischer-Tropsch Economics Enabled by Microchannel Technology , 2011 .

[37]  Anne-Marie Tillman,et al.  Significance of decision-making for LCA methodology , 2000 .

[38]  K. Sjöström,et al.  Upgrading of Raw Gas from Biomass and Waste Gasification: Challenges and Opportunities , 2011 .