Relationship between Third Molar Agenesis and Other Dental Anomalies

Objective The purpose of this study was to find the prevalence of dental abnormalities in patients with third molar agenesis, and a comparison was made for the prevalence of those anomalies within the north Indian natives. Materials and Methods Pretreatment records of 518 patients were collected. Out of 518 patients whose records were analyzed, 472 patient records were selected on the basis of inclusion and exclusion standards. Panoramic radiographs and dental casts were analyzed in patients who had an absence of at least one third molar in which absence of any other tooth, presence of supernumerary teeth, presence of impacted canines, and peg-shaped lateral incisors were further assessed. The prevalence of these anomalies was compared with a randomly selected group of patients with presence of third molars that served as controls. Statistical analysis was done using the chi-square test (p < 0.05) and odds ratio. Results The incidence of third molar nondevelopment was found to be 19.2%. The presence of other anomalies was 39.5% in patients with third molar nondevelopment, and difference was statistically significant. The occurrence of impacted canines in patients with absence of third molars was 22%, and presence of third molars was 6.6%. The presence of other dental anomalies, that is, supernumerary teeth and tooth agenesis, was 7.7% in the agenesis group, which was also higher than that in the control group (3.3%) but was not statistically significant. The incidence of peg-shaped lateral incisors was similar in both the groups. Conclusion Impacted canines and total dental anomalies are more often related with absence of third molars than with the presence of third molars.

[1]  O. Kolokitha,et al.  Role of third molars in orthodontics. , 2015, World journal of clinical cases.

[2]  Mona A Montasser,et al.  Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. , 2012, Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement.

[3]  M. Bayram,et al.  Patterns of third-molar agenesis and associated dental anomalies in an orthodontic population. , 2011, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  S. Nirmala,et al.  Hypohyperdontia: Agenesis of three third molars and mandibular centrals associated with midline supernumerary tooth in mandible , 2010, Contemporary clinical dentistry.

[5]  S. Garn,et al.  The Relationship Between Third Molar Agenesis And Reduction In Tooth Number , 2009 .

[6]  D. Garib,et al.  Increased occurrence of dental anomalies associated with second-premolar agenesis. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[7]  T. Uysal,et al.  Hypodontia. Does the Prevalence and Distribution Pattern Differ in Orthodontic Patients? , 2007, European journal of dentistry.

[8]  W. Thomson,et al.  Third molar outcomes from age 18 to 26: findings from a population-based New Zealand longitudinal study. , 2001 .

[9]  T. Kajii,et al.  Presence of third molar germs in orthodontic patients in Japan. , 2001, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  H. Vastardis The genetics of human tooth agenesis: new discoveries for understanding dental anomalies. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[11]  T. Baccetti A controlled study of associated dental anomalies. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[12]  M. Kataja,et al.  Prevalence of tooth agenesis and peg-shaped maxillary lateral incisor associated with palatally displaced canine (PDC) anomaly. , 1996, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  A. Demirjian,et al.  Sexual Dimorphism in the Development, Emergence, and Agenesis of the Mandibular Third Molar , 1981, Journal of dental research.

[14]  M. Richardson Late third molar genesis: its significance in orthodontic treatment. , 1980, The Angle orthodontist.

[15]  R. M. Shah,et al.  The Relationship Between Presence and Absence of Third Molars Hypodontia of other Teeth , 1979, Journal of dental research.

[16]  E. H. Ashton,et al.  Cusp pattern, tooth size and third molar agenesis in the human mandibular dentition. , 1970, Archives of oral biology.

[17]  E. Hunt,et al.  The permanent mandibular first molar: its calcification, eruption and decay. , 1955, American journal of physical anthropology.

[18]  M. Massler,et al.  DEVELOPMENTAL PATTERN OF THE CHILD AS REFLECTED IN THE CALCIFICATION PATTERN OF THE TEETH , 1941 .