Prezi versus PowerPoint: The effects of varied digital presentation tools on students' learning performance

This study investigated the effect of varied digital presentation tools (PowerPoint and Prezi) on the learning performance of students. The research focus was to evaluate how different presentation technologies used by class instructors affect the knowledge acquisition of students. A quasi experimental pre- and post-test control group design was adopted to fulfill the research purpose. The educational experiment was completed within 4 weeks. The participants were 78 fifth-grade students from a public elementary school in Taiwan. Students from three classes were divided into three treatment groups: PowerPoint instruction, Prezi instruction, and traditional instruction. Two quizzes (formative evaluation) directly related to learning units were administered to assess the immediate learning outcomes of the students after class. A learning achievement test (summative evaluation) was developed to measure the basic geographical knowledge of the students in a social science class. Two weeks after the summative evaluation was completed, the same learning achievement test with different item numbers (delayed summative evaluation) was employed to assess the long-term learning effects of the students. The results showed that Prezi was a more effective instructional medium for knowledge acquisition compared with traditional instruction. PowerPoint demonstrated instructional effectiveness on only the long-term learning retention of the students compared with traditional instruction. However, no significant difference was observed among the three types of tests in Prezi and PowerPoint instruction. Prezi was a more effective instructional medium for knowledge acquisition.PowerPoint demonstrated instructional benefit on long-term learning retention.No significant difference was observed between Prezi and PowerPoint instruction.

[1]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[2]  Robert A. Bartsch,et al.  Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Joshua E. Susskind Limits of PowerPoint's Power: Enhancing students' self-efficacy and attitudes but not their behavior , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Jennifer Clark Powerpoint and Pedagogy: Maintaining Student Interest in University Lectures , 2008 .

[5]  Jordi Casteleyn,et al.  Presenting material via graphic organizers in science classes in secondary education , 2012 .

[6]  Lisa Daniels,et al.  Introducing technology in the classroom: PowerPoint as a first step , 1999, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[7]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Practical Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[8]  Brian E. Perron,et al.  A Review of a Presentation Technology: Prezi , 2011 .

[9]  Lisa A. Burke,et al.  PowerPoint-Based Lectures in Business Education: An Empirical Investigation of Student-Perceived Novelty and Effectiveness , 2008 .

[10]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[11]  Cornelia Brodahl,et al.  A Tale of Two Cultures: Cross Cultural Comparison in Learning the Prezi Presentation Software Tool in the US and Norway , 2013, J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res..

[12]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Cognitive Architectures for Multimedia Learning , 2006 .

[13]  L. Aiken Psychological testing and assessment , 1976 .

[14]  Joshua E. Susskind PowerPoint's power in the classroom: enhancing students' self-efficacy and attitudes , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  Zoomable user interfaces as a medium for slide show presentations , 2002, Inf. Vis..

[16]  Jennifer M. Apperson,et al.  An assessment of student preferences for PowerPoint presentation structure in undergraduate courses , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Joshua W. Bean Presentation software supporting visual design: Displaying spatial relationships with a zooming user interface , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference.

[18]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  e-Learning and the Science of Instruction , 2016 .

[19]  Martin Valcke,et al.  The impact of graphic organisers on learning from presentations , 2013 .

[20]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[21]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint: Pitching Out Corrupts Within , 2003 .

[22]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  The elaboration theory: Guidance for scope and sequence decisions. , 1999 .

[23]  Jussi Myllärniemi,et al.  Diversifying higher education: facilitating different ways of learning , 2013 .

[24]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning How to Learn , 1984 .

[25]  Brian D. Ballentine,et al.  High concept and design documentation: Using Prezi for undergraduate game design , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference.

[26]  Timothy D. Pippert,et al.  Multiple Perspectives on Multimedia in the Large Lecture , 1999 .

[27]  Aaron Doering,et al.  Integrating Educational Technology Into Teaching , 1996 .