Effects of sentence context in L2 natural speech comprehension

Electrophysiological studies consistently find N400 effects of semantic incongruity in non-native written language comprehension. Typically these N400 effects are later than N400 effects in native comprehension, suggesting that semantic processing in one’s second language (L2) may be delayed compared to one’s first language (L1). In this study we were firstly interested in replicating the semantic incongruity effect using natural auditory speech, which poses strong demands on the speed of processing. Secondly, we wished to investigate whether a possible delay in semantic processing might be due to bilinguals accessing lexical items from both their L1 and L2 (a more extensive lexical search). We recorded EEG from 30 Dutch-English bilinguals who listened to English sentences in which the sentence-final word was�� (1) semantically fitting, (2) semantically incongruent, (3) initially congruent�� semantically incongruent, but sharing initial phonemes with the most probable sentence completion within the L2, (4) semantically incongruent, but sharing initial phonemes with the L1 translation equivalent of the most probable sentence completion. We found an N400 effect in each of the semantically incongruent conditions. This N400 effect was significantly delayed to L2 words that were initially congruent with the sentence context. We found no effect of initial overlap with L1 translation equivalents. Taken together these findings firstly demonstrate that non-native listeners are sensitive to semantic incongruity in natural speech, secondly indicate that semantic integration in non-native listening can start on the basis of word initial phonemes, and finally suggest that during L2 sentence processing listeners do not access the L1 lexicon.

[1]  P. Hagoort,et al.  The Influence of Semantic and Syntactic Context Constraints on Lexical Selection and Integration in Spoken-Word Comprehension as Revealed by ERPs , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  J. Kroll,et al.  Handbook of bilingualism : psycholinguistic approaches , 2005 .

[3]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Shared and separate systems in bilingual language processing: Converging evidence from eyetracking and brain imaging , 2003, Brain and Language.

[4]  J. Grainger,et al.  Recognition of Cognates and Interlingual Homographs: The Neglected Role of Phonology , 1999 .

[5]  François Grosjean,et al.  Life with two languages :an introduction to bilingualism , 1984 .

[6]  A. Weber,et al.  Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition , 2004 .

[7]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Bilingual and monolingual processing of competing lexical items , 2003, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[8]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition , 2003, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[9]  J. Connolly,et al.  Event-related potential sensitivity to acoustic and semantic properties of terminal words in sentences , 1992, Brain and Language.

[10]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The Processing Nature of the N400: Evidence from Masked Priming , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  P. Holcomb Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[12]  Viorica M Arian,et al.  Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language , 2003 .

[13]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  ERP effects of listening to speech: semantic ERP effects , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[15]  Michele T. Diaz,et al.  Electrophysiological differentiation of phonological and semantic integration in word and sentence contexts , 2007, Brain Research.

[16]  J. Connolly,et al.  The effects of processing requirements on neurophysiological responses to spoken sentences , 1990, Brain and Language.

[17]  M. Kutas,et al.  Interactions between sentence context and word frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[18]  A Hahne,et al.  What's Different in Second-Language Processing? Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[19]  H. Neville,et al.  Language and , 2019, Adventure Diffusion.

[20]  Kerrie E. Elston-Güttler,et al.  Native and L2 Processing of Homonyms in Sentential Context. , 2005 .

[21]  Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Second Language Interferes with Word Production in Fluent Bilinguals: Brain Potential and Functional Imaging Evidence , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  D. Allan,et al.  Oxford placement test , 2004 .

[23]  M. Kutas,et al.  An Electrophysiological Analysis of the Time Course of Conceptual and Syntactic Encoding during Tacit Picture Naming , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Ping Li Spoken Word Recognition of Code-Switched Words by Chinese–English Bilinguals ☆ , 1996 .

[25]  G. Nas,et al.  Visual word recognition in bilinguals: evidence for a cooperation between visual and sound based codes during access to a common lexical store , 1983 .

[26]  Don L. Scarborough,et al.  Independence of lexical access in bilingual word recognition , 1984 .

[27]  Lisa D. Sanders,et al.  An ERP study of continuous speech processing. II. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in non-native speakers. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[28]  Nancy K. Squires,et al.  Phonological Processing and the Role of Strategy in Silent Reading: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence , 1996, Brain and Language.

[29]  Eric Maris,et al.  Randomization tests for ERP topographies and whole spatiotemporal data matrices. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[30]  H. Neville,et al.  Maturational Constraints on Functional Specializations for Language Processing: ERP and Behavioral Evidence in Bilingual Speakers , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Early Contextual Influences during Spoken-Word Recognition: N200 Versus N400 Effects , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  Christine Weber-Fox,et al.  Event-related brain potential markers of high-language proficiency in adults , 2003, Brain and Language.

[33]  Marta Kutas,et al.  The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: an ERP study. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[34]  T. Dijkstra,et al.  Recognition of interlingual homophones in bilingual auditory word recognition. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  E. Plante,et al.  Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  Ton Dijkstra,et al.  Three languages, one ECHO: Cognate effects in trilingual word recognition , 2004 .

[37]  J. Connolly,et al.  Event-Related Potential Components Reflect Phonological and Semantic Processing of the Terminal Word of Spoken Sentences , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  A. Dijkstra Bilingual Visual Word Recognition and Lexical Access. , 2005 .

[39]  Lisa D. Sanders,et al.  An ERP study of continuous speech processing. I. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in native speakers. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[40]  J. Connolly,et al.  Influence of phonological expectations during a phoneme deletion task: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[41]  E Donchin,et al.  Brain potentials as indices of orthographic and phonological interaction during word matching. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[43]  Carlos Soares,et al.  Bilinguals in a monolingual and a bilingual speech mode: The effect on lexical access , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[44]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[45]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Cross Talk Between Native and Second Languages: Partial Activation of an Irrelevant Lexicon , 1999 .

[46]  Renata Meuter,et al.  Brain responses to semantic incongruity in bilinguals , 1990, Brain and Language.

[47]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[48]  F. Grosjean Exploring the recognition of guest words in bilingual speech , 1988 .

[49]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The cascaded nature of lexical selection and integration in auditory sentence processing. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  Kerrie E. Elston-Güttler,et al.  Is bilingual lexical access influenced by language context? , 2006, Neuroreport.