Feasibility and acceptability of offering rapid HIV tests to patients registering with primary care in London (UK): a pilot study

Objective: To assess the acceptability and feasibility of offering rapid HIV tests to patients registering with primary care in London, UK. Methods: All Anglophone and Francophone patients aged between 18 and 55 years attending a large inner city general practice in London for a new patient health check were recruited. All eligible patients were offered a rapid HIV test on oral fluid and asked to participate in a qualitative interview. The uptake of rapid HIV testing among participants was measured and semistructured interviews were carried out focusing on the advantages and disadvantages of testing for HIV in primary care. Results: 111 people attended the health check, of whom 85 were eligible, 47 took part in the study and 20 completed qualitative interviews. Nearly half of eligible participants (38/85, 45%) accepted a rapid HIV test. The main reason for accepting a test was because it was offered as “part of a check up”. As a combined group, black African and black Caribbean patients were more likely to test in the study compared with patients from other ethnic backgrounds (p = 0.014). Participants in the qualitative interviews felt that having rapid HIV tests available in general practice was acceptable but expressed concerns about support for the newly diagnosed. Conclusions: Offering patients a rapid HIV test in primary care is feasible and could be an effective means to increase testing rates in this setting. A larger descriptive study or pragmatic trial is needed to determine whether this strategy could increase timely diagnosis and reduce the proportion of undiagnosed HIV infections in the UK.

[1]  O. Warren,et al.  Missed opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis in an emergency department despite an HIV screening program. , 2009, AIDS patient care and STDs.

[2]  B. Gazzard,et al.  Indicator disease‐guided testing for HIV – the next step for Europe? , 2008, HIV medicine.

[3]  M. Fisher Late diagnosis of HIV infection: major consequences and missed opportunities. , 2008, Current opinion in infectious diseases.

[4]  J. Nazroo,et al.  Missed opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis within primary and secondary healthcare settings in the UK , 2008, AIDS.

[5]  J. Hemelaar,et al.  Time to move towards opt-out testing for HIV in the UK , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  A. Prost,et al.  “There is such a thing as asking for trouble”: taking rapid HIV testing to gay venues is fraught with challenges , 2006, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[7]  C. Sabin,et al.  Newly diagnosed HIV infections: review in UK and Ireland , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Stephen B. Thomas,et al.  Understanding the patient's perspective on rapid and routine HIV testing in an inner-city urgent care center. , 2004, AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education.

[9]  C. Griffiths,et al.  Screening for tuberculosis: the port of arrival scheme compared with screening in general practice and the homeless , 2002, Thorax.

[10]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Analysing qualitative data , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  Hiv UK national guidelines for HIV testing. , 2008 .

[12]  J. Gerberding,et al.  Rapid HIV testing in outreach and other community settings--United States, 2004-2006. , 2007, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.