Compliance of LC50 and NOEC data with Benford's Law: an indication of reliability?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] W Slob,et al. No-effect concentration as a basis for ecological risk assessment. , 1996, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[2] Eleanor Dallaway. Editorial: Bad habits die hard , 2010 .
[3] Simon Newcomb,et al. Note on the Frequency of Use of the Different Digits in Natural Numbers , 1881 .
[4] George G. Judge,et al. Detecting Problems in Survey Data Using Benford’s Law , 2007, The Journal of Human Resources.
[5] J R Wheeler,et al. Species sensitivity distributions: data and model choice. , 2002, Marine pollution bulletin.
[6] Bernhard Rauch,et al. Fact and Fiction in EU-Governmental Economic Data , 2011 .
[7] F. Wilcoxon,et al. A simplified method of evaluating dose-effect experiments. , 1948, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.
[8] Patricia Pepple Williamson,et al. Detecting Fraud in Data Sets Using Benford's Law , 2004 .
[9] T. Jager. Bad habits die hard: The NOEC's persistence reflects poorly on ecotoxicology , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.
[10] K S Crump,et al. A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. , 1984, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.
[11] Marlene Ågerstrand,et al. Comparison of four different methods for reliability evaluation of ecotoxicity data: a case study of non-standard test data used in environmental risk assessments of pharmaceutical substances , 2011 .
[12] Christopher F. Dumas,et al. DETECTING EVIDENCE OF NON-COMPLIANCE IN SELF-REPORTED POLLUTION EMISSIONS DATA: AN APPLICATION OF BENFORD'S LAW , 2000 .
[13] Cindy Durtschi,et al. The effective use of Benford's Law to assist in detecting fraud in accounting data , 2004 .
[14] A. Casadevall,et al. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[15] T. Hill. The Significant-Digit Phenomenon , 1995 .
[16] Leo Posthuma,et al. Species Sensitivity Distributions , 2018, Statistical Analysis of Ecotoxicity Studies.
[17] J. Hamilton,et al. Assessing the Accuracy of Self-Reported Data: an Evaluation of the Toxics Release Inventory , 2006 .
[18] D. Zwart. Observed Regularities in Species Sensitivity Distributions for Aquatic Species , 2001 .
[19] R. Fewster. A Simple Explanation of Benford's Law , 2009 .
[20] I. Purchase,et al. Fraud, errors and gamesmanship in experimental toxicology. , 2004, Toxicology.
[21] Arno Berger,et al. Benford’s Law Strikes Back: No Simple Explanation in Sight for Mathematical Gem , 2011 .
[22] Brian J. Gaines,et al. Breaking the (Benford) Law , 2007 .
[23] U. Tillmann,et al. A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. , 1997, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[24] H N Nigg,et al. Scientific misconduct in environmental science and toxicology. , 1994, JAMA.