CD8 single-cell gene coexpression reveals three different effector types present at distinct phases of the immune response

To study in vivo CD8 T cell differentiation, we quantified the coexpression of multiple genes in single cells throughout immune responses. After in vitro activation, CD8 T cells rapidly express effector molecules and cease their expression when the antigen is removed. Gene behavior after in vivo activation, in contrast, was quite heterogeneous. Different mRNAs were induced at very different time points of the response, were transcribed during different time periods, and could decline or persist independently of the antigen load. Consequently, distinct gene coexpression patterns/different cell types were generated at the various phases of the immune responses. During primary stimulation, inflammatory molecules were induced and down-regulated shortly after activation, generating early cells that only mediated inflammation. Cytotoxic T cells were generated at the peak of the primary response, when individual cells simultaneously expressed multiple killer molecules, whereas memory cells lost killer capacity because they no longer coexpressed killer genes. Surprisingly, during secondary responses gene transcription became permanent. Secondary cells recovered after antigen elimination were more efficient killers than cytotoxic T cells present at the peak of the primary response. Thus, primary responses produced two transient effector types. However, after boosting, CD8 T cells differentiate into long-lived killer cells that persist in vivo in the absence of antigen.

[1]  B. Rocha,et al.  Anergy and exhaustion are independent mechanisms of peripheral T cell tolerance , 1995, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[2]  R. Flavell,et al.  T helper cell differentiation: regulation by cis elements and epigenetics. , 2006, Immunity.

[3]  J. Panus,et al.  Antigen-specific T helper cell function: differential cytokine expression in primary and memory responses. , 2000 .

[4]  Sang-Jun Ha,et al.  Stimulation history dictates memory CD8 T cell phenotype: implications for prime-boost vaccination. , 2006, Journal of immunology.

[5]  J. Sprent,et al.  Homeostasis of memory T cells , 2006, Immunological reviews.

[6]  A. Trautmann,et al.  Modifications of CD8+ T cell function during in vivo memory or tolerance induction. , 1998, Immunity.

[7]  M. Tsao,et al.  Identification of a cross‐reactive self ligand in virus‐mediated autoimmunity , 1999, European journal of immunology.

[8]  E. Lance,et al.  The distribution of chromium 51-labelled lymphoid cells in the mouse. A survey of anatomical compartments. , 1970, Cellular immunology.

[9]  J. Opferman,et al.  Linear differentiation of cytotoxic effectors into memory T lymphocytes. , 1999, Science.

[10]  P. Hodgkin,et al.  Cell division regulates the T cell cytokine repertoire, revealing a mechanism underlying immune class regulation. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  M. Croft,et al.  Generation of polarized antigen-specific CD8 effector populations: reciprocal action of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-12 in promoting type 2 versus type 1 cytokine profiles , 1994, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[12]  Henrique Veiga-Fernandes,et al.  Response of naïve and memory CD8+ T cells to antigen stimulation in vivo , 2000, Nature Immunology.

[13]  E. Wherry,et al.  Selective expression of the interleukin 7 receptor identifies effector CD8 T cells that give rise to long-lived memory cells , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[14]  R. Herberman,et al.  Lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity. , 1987, Pediatric annals.

[15]  A. Freitas,et al.  The clone size of peripheral CD8 T cells is regulated by TCR promiscuity , 2006, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[16]  K. D. Zylan,et al.  Article , 1996, Physiology & Behavior.

[17]  P. Matzinger,et al.  An innate sense of danger. , 1998, Seminars in immunology.

[18]  G. Schneider,et al.  A Structural Basis for CD8+ T Cell-dependent Recognition of Non-homologous Peptide Ligands , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  Susan M. Kaech,et al.  Molecular and Functional Profiling of Memory CD8 T Cell Differentiation , 2002, Cell.

[20]  J. Massagué TGF-beta signal transduction. , 1998, Annual review of biochemistry.

[21]  C. Evaristo,et al.  Cartography of gene expression in CD8 single cells: novel CCR7- subsets suggest differentiation independent of CD45RA expression. , 2007, Blood.

[22]  B. Stockinger,et al.  Following the development of a CD4 T cell response in vivo: from activation to memory formation. , 1999, Immunity.

[23]  B. Rocha,et al.  A Role for CD40 Expression on CD8+ T Cells in the Generation of CD8+ T Cell Memory , 2002, Science.

[24]  J. Raser,et al.  Noise in Gene Expression: Origins, Consequences, and Control , 2005, Science.

[25]  B. Stockinger,et al.  Impairment of immunological memory in the absence of MHC despite survival of memory T cells , 2002, Nature Immunology.

[26]  Graham M Lord,et al.  Recent developments in the transcriptional regulation of cytolytic effector cells , 2004, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[27]  E. Pamer,et al.  Rapid Development of T Cell Memory1 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[28]  B. Rocha,et al.  Quantification of multiple gene expression in individual cells. , 2004, Genome research.

[29]  J. Harty,et al.  Dynamic Regulation of IFN-γ Signaling in Antigen-Specific CD8+ T Cells Responding to Infection1 , 2005, The Journal of Immunology.

[30]  J. Harty,et al.  Secondary memory CD8+ T cells are more protective but slower to acquire a central–memory phenotype , 2006, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[31]  B. Gunnlaugsdottir,et al.  Transforming Growth Factor‐β as a Regulator of Site‐Specific T‐Cell Inflammatory Response , 2003, Scandinavian journal of immunology.

[32]  E. Cox,et al.  Real-Time Kinetics of Gene Activity in Individual Bacteria , 2005, Cell.

[33]  A. Kelso,et al.  Cutting edge: stable epigenetic inheritance of regional IFN-gamma promoter demethylation in CD44highCD8+ T lymphocytes. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[34]  J. Harty,et al.  Dynamic regulation of IFN-gamma signaling in antigen-specific CD8+ T cells responding to infection. , 2005, Journal of immunology.

[35]  J. Raser,et al.  Control of Stochasticity in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, Science.

[36]  F. Lemonnier,et al.  Differential requirements for survival and proliferation of CD8 naïve or memory T cells. , 1997, Science.

[37]  B. Rocha,et al.  The Tower of Babel of CD8+ T‐cell memory: known facts, deserted roads, muddy waters, and possible dead ends , 2006, Immunological reviews.

[38]  T. Brunner,et al.  Differential Contribution of Fas- and Perforin-Mediated Mechanisms to the Cell-Mediated Cytotoxic Activity of Naive and In Vivo-Primed Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocytes1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[39]  L. Lefrançois,et al.  Intestinal Epithelial Antigen Induces Mucosal CD8 T Cell Tolerance, Activation, and Inflammatory Response1 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.