Effect of a nursing information system on the quality of information processing in nursing: An evaluation study using the HIS-monitor instrument

OBJECTIVES To assess the changes in the quality of information processing in nursing after the introduction of a computer-based nursing information system. METHODS 94 nurses filled out the HIS-monitor survey, comprising 41 questions and focusing on the quality of the information processing, shortly before and again one year after the introduction of a computer-based nursing information system. A McNemar-Bowker-test was used to assess the changes in quality over time. The HIS-monitor instrument was formally validated by calculating Cronbach Alpha. RESULTS Despite some technical problems, the quality of the information processing in nursing significantly improved after the introduction of a computer-based nursing information system in many areas. The results show improved support during patient anamnesis and care planning, higher availability and completeness of nursing documentation, better overview on the patient, better readability of nursing documentation, reduction of duplicate documentation, better workflow support with task lists and checklists, and better fulfillment of the legal regulations. The results with regard to time efforts for nursing documentation and the related impact on patient care were mixed, however. Most of the expectations of the nurses that were stated before IT introduction seem to have been realized. CONCLUSIONS The HIS-monitor was found to be a useful instrument, in turn showing that the quality of the information processing in nursing strongly increased after the introduction of a nursing information system.

[1]  D. Sindhusake,et al.  A comparison of nursing activities associated with manual and automated documentation in an Australian intensive care unit. , 1997, Computers in nursing.

[2]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[4]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  HIS-Monitor: An approach to assess the quality of information processing in hospitals , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[5]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  Marion J. Ball,et al.  Introduction to Nursing Informatics , 1995, Computers in Health Care.

[7]  Ting-Ting Lee,et al.  Two-stage evaluation of the impact of a nursing information system in Taiwan , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[8]  Ming-Huei Lu,et al.  The Multimethod Evaluation of a Nursing Information System in Taiwan , 2009, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[9]  Hans-Ulrich Prokosch,et al.  Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems: Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck , 2004, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[10]  P Wainwright,et al.  Nursing record systems: effects on nursing practice and health care outcomes. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  S. Kossman,et al.  Perceptions of impact of electronic health records on nurses' work. , 2006, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[12]  R. Nahm,et al.  Measurement of the effects of an integrated, point-of-care computer system on quality of nursing documentation and patient satisfaction. , 2000, Computers in nursing.

[13]  Reed M. Gardner,et al.  Strategic Information Management in Hospitals: An Introduction to Hospital Information Systems , 2004 .

[14]  Cindy Farquhar,et al.  3 The Cochrane Library , 1996 .

[15]  K. Lewin.  Frontiers in Group Dynamics , 1947 .

[16]  Markus Bühner.  Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion , 2008 .

[17]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[18]  Stuart B. Boxerman,et al.  Describing Nurses' Work: Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[19]  J. Larrabee,et al.  Evaluation of documentation before and after implementation of a nursing information system in an acute care hospital. , 2001, Computers in nursing.

[20]  Charles P. Friedman,et al.  Evaluation Methods in Medical Informatics , 1997, Computers and Medicine.

[21]  C. Langowski.  The Times They Are A Changing: Effects of Online Nursing Documentation Systems , 2005, Quality management in health care.

[22]  Christine Urquhart,et al.  Nursing record systems: effects on nursing practice and healthcare outcomes. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[23]  R D Henderson,et al.  User expectations and perceptions of a patient management information system. , 1996, Computers in nursing.

[24]  Robyn Tamblyn,et al.  Review Paper: The Impact of Electronic Health Records on Time Efficiency of Physicians and Nurses: A Systematic Review , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[25]  Arild Faxvaag,et al.  Task-oriented evaluation of electronic medical records systems: development and validation of a questionnaire for physicians , 2004, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[26]  R Roberts,et al.  Verifying quality and safety in health informatics services , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.