Iteration schemes for rapid post‐stall aerodynamic prediction of wings using a decambering approach

SUMMARY Nonlinear aerodynamics of wings may be evaluated using an iterative decambering approach. In this approach, the effect of flow separation due to stall at any wing section is modeled as an effective reduction in section camber. The approach uses a wing analysis method for potential-flow calculations and viscous airfoil lift curves for the sections as input. The calculation procedure is implemented using a Newton–Raphson iteration to simultaneously satisfy the boundary condition, which comes from potential-flow wing theory, and drive the sectional operating points toward their respective viscous lift curves, as required for convergence. Of particular interest in this research is the calculation of the residuals during the Newton iteration. Unlike a typical implementation of the Newton iteration, the residual calculation is not performed via a straightforward function evaluation, but rather by estimating the target operating points on the input viscous lift curves. Estimation of these target operating points depends on the assumptions made in the cross-coupling of the decambering at the different sections. This paper presents four residual calculation schemes for the decambering approach. The residual calculation schemes are compared against each other to assess computational speed and robustness. Decambering results are also compared with higher-order computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solutions for rectangular and swept wings. Results from the best scheme compare well with the CFD solutions for the rectangular wing, motivating further development of the method. Poor predictions for the swept wings are traced to spanwise propagation of separated flow at stall, highlighting the limitations of the current approach. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  J. Katz,et al.  Cellular patterns in poststall flow over unswept wings , 1983 .

[2]  A. M. Kuethe,et al.  Foundations of aerodynamics: bases of aerodynamic design , 1986 .

[3]  R. Mukherjee,et al.  Poststall prediction of multiple-lifting-surface configurations using a decambering approach , 2004 .

[4]  E. S. Levinsky,et al.  Nonlinear Lifting Line Theory for Predicting Stalling Instabilities on Wings of Moderate Aspect Ratio , 1976 .

[5]  Adam M. Wickenheiser,et al.  Extended Nonlinear Lifting-Line Method for Aerodynamic Modeling of Reconfigurable Aircraft , 2011 .

[6]  W. Sears Some Recent Developments in Airfoil Theory , 1956 .

[7]  Robert Sorg Schairer Unsymmetrical lift distributions on a stalled monoplane wing , 1939 .

[8]  Barnes W. McCormick,et al.  An Iterative Non-Linear Lifting Line Model For Wings with Unsymmetrical Stall , 1989 .

[9]  C. W. Harper,et al.  A review of the stall characteristics of swept wings , 1964 .

[10]  Michael S. Selig,et al.  Modeling full-envelope aerodynamics of small UAVs in realtime , 2010 .

[11]  C. P. van Dam,et al.  Design-oriented high-lift methodology for general aviation and civil transport aircraft , 2001 .

[12]  James C. Sivells,et al.  Method for calculating wing characteristics by lifting-line theory using nonlinear section lift data , 1947 .

[13]  Ashok Gopalarathnam,et al.  A CFD Database for Airfoils and Wings at Post-Stall Angles of Attack , 2013 .

[14]  Ashok Gopalarathnam,et al.  Ideal Lift Distributions and Flap Angles for Adaptive Wings , 2004 .

[15]  D. Owens Weissinger's model of the nonlinear lifting-line method for aircraft design , 1998 .

[16]  Paresh Parikh,et al.  The NASA tetrahedral unstructured software system (TetrUSS) , 2000, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[17]  J. Ferziger Numerical methods for engineering application , 1981 .

[18]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[19]  Ashok Gopalarathnam,et al.  Drag Reduction Methodology for Adaptive Tailless Aircraft , 2012 .

[20]  I. H. Abbott,et al.  Theory of Wing Sections , 1959 .

[21]  C. Edward Lan,et al.  Calculation of aerodynamic characteristics of airplane configurations at high angles of attack , 1988 .

[22]  Jinsoo Cho,et al.  Calculation of nonlinear aerodynamic characteristics of a wing using a 3-D panel method , 2008 .

[23]  Ashok Gopalarathnam,et al.  Drag Reduction on Aircraft Configurations with Adaptive Lifting Surfaces , 2014 .

[24]  J. Anderson,et al.  Fundamentals of Aerodynamics , 1984 .

[25]  D. Rodríguez,et al.  On the birth of stall cells on airfoils , 2011 .

[26]  Ashok Gopalarathnamand,et al.  Use of Lift Superposition for Improved Computational Efficiency of Wing Post-Stall Prediction , 2008 .

[27]  Ashok Gopalarathnam,et al.  Simulation of Flight Dynamics with an Improved Post-Stall Aerodynamics Model , 2012 .

[28]  J. Anderson,et al.  Numerical lifting line theory applied to drooped leading-edge wings below and above stall , 1980 .

[29]  Raymond F Anderson,et al.  Determination of the Characteristics of Tapered Wings , 1937 .

[30]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Compact Formulation of Nonlinear Inviscid Aerodynamics for Fixed-Wing Aircraft , 2012 .

[31]  J. Barlow,et al.  Flowfield Model for a Rectangular Planform Wing beyond Stall , 1980 .