Communication Channels in General Internal Medicine: A Description of Baseline Patterns for Improved Interprofessional Collaboration

General internal medicine (GIM) is a communicatively complex specialty because of its diverse patient population and the number and diversity of health care providers working on a medicine ward. Effective interprofessional communication in such information-intensive environments is critical to achieving optimal patient care. Few empirical studies have explored the ways in which health professionals exchange patient information and the implications of their chosen communication forms. In this article, we report on an ethnographic study of health professionals' communication in two GIM wards through the lens of communication genre theory. We categorize and explore communication in GIM into two genre sets—synchronous and asynchronous—and analyze the relationship between them. Our findings reveal an essential relationship between synchronous and asynchronous modes of communication that has implications for the effectiveness of interprofessional collaboration in this and similar health care settings, and is intended to inform efforts to overcome existing interprofessional communication barriers.

[1]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  Ethnography : Principles in Practice , 1983 .

[2]  Carolyn R. Miller.  Genre as social action , 1984 .

[3]  C. Geertz,et al.  Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. , 1988 .

[4]  Steven P. Feldman.  Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author , 1989 .

[5]  R. Hugman.  Power in caring professions , 1991 .

[6]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media , 1992 .

[7]  Catherine F. Schryer,et al.  Records as Genre , 1993 .

[8]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations , 1994 .

[9]  John M. Swales,et al.  Genre and the new rhetoric , 1995 .

[10]  Enrico W. Coiera,et al.  Communication behaviours in a hospital setting: an observational study , 1998, BMJ.

[11]  Natasha Artemeva,et al.  The writing consultant as cultural interpreter: Bridging cultural perspectives on the genre of the periodic engineering report , 1998 .

[12]  L. Lingard,et al.  Teaching and learning communication in medicine: a rhetorical approach. , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[13]  Patricia L. Dunmire.  Genre as Temporally Situated Social Action , 2000 .

[14]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Analysing qualitative data , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  Sue Ziebland,et al.  Analysing qualitative data , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  L. Lingard,et al.  Learning oral presentation skills: a rhetorical analysis with pedagogical and professional implications. , 2001, Journal of general internal medicine.

[17]  J Molyneux,et al.  Interprofessional teamworking: what makes teams work well? , 2001, Journal of interprofessional care.

[18]  Scott Reeves,et al.  Working together but apart: barriers and routes to nurse--physician collaboration. , 2002, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[19]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genre Systems: Structuring Interaction through Communicative Norms , 2002 .

[20]  Lorelei Lingard,et al.  Team Communications in the Operating Room: Talk Patterns, Sites of Tension, and Implications for Novices , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[21]  A. Atwal,et al.  Do multidisciplinary integrated care pathways improve interprofessional collaboration? , 2002, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[22]  L Lingard,et al.  ‘Talking the talk’: school and workplace genre tension in clerkship case presentations , 2003, Medical education.

[23]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  Compound Mediation in Software Development: Using Genre Ecologies to Study Textual Artifacts , 2003 .

[24]  Catherine F. Schryer,et al.  A certain art of uncertainty: case presentation and the development of professional identity. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[25]  M. Halm,et al.  Interdisciplinary Rounds: Impact on Patients, Families, and Staff , 2003, Clinical nurse specialist CNS.

[26]  J. Pethybridge.  How team working influences discharge planning from hospital: a study of four multi-disciplinary teams in an acute hospital in England , 2004, Journal of interprofessional care.

[27]  S. Reeves,et al.  Interprofessional collaboration in the hospital: strategies and meanings , 2004, Journal of health services research & policy.

[28]  Catherine F. Schryer,et al.  Tensions in the Field: Teaching Standards of Practice in Optometry Case Presentations , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[29]  Maureen Coombs,et al.  Medical hegemony in decision-making--a barrier to interdisciplinary working in intensive care? , 2004, Journal of advanced nursing.

[30]  Lorelei Lingard,et al.  Techne or Artful Science and the Genre of Case Presentations in Healthcare Settings , 2005 .

[31]  D. Meltzer,et al.  Communication failures in patient sign-out and suggestions for improvement: a critical incident analysis , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[32]  Teaching the Balancing Act: Integrating Patient And Professional Agendas in Optometry , 2005 .

[33]  Ron D Hays,et al.  Effect of a multidisciplinary intervention on communication and collaboration among physicians and nurses. , 2005, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[34]  P. Hall,et al.  Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers , 2005, Journal of interprofessional care.

[35]  E. Zink.  Effect of a multidisciplinary intervention on communication and collaboration among physicians and nurses. , 2006, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[36]  Adrian Jones,et al.  Multidisciplinary team working: collaboration and conflict. , 2006, International journal of mental health nursing.

[37]  Lorelei Lingard,et al.  Look Who’s Talking , 2006 .

[38]  Carsten S. Østerlund.  Genre Combinations: A Window into Dynamic Communication Practices , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Scott Reeves,et al.  Structuring communication relationships for interprofessional teamwork (SCRIPT): A Canadian initiative aimed at improving patient-centred care , 2007, Journal of interprofessional care.

[40]  Samer Faraj,et al.  What whiteboards in a trauma center operating suite can teach us about emergency department communication. , 2007, Annals of emergency medicine.

[41]  L. Lingard,et al.  Interprofessional information work: Innovations in the use of the chart on internal medicine teams , 2007, Journal of interprofessional care.

[42]  Rhona Flin,et al.  Communication skills and error in the intensive care unit , 2007, Current opinion in critical care.

[43]  Scott Reeves,et al.  Qualitative research methodologies: ethnography , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[44]  Rick Iedema,et al.  Reshaping ICU Ward Round Practices Using Video-Reflexive Ethnography , 2008, Qualitative health research.

[45]  Scott Reeves,et al.  The doctor-nurse game in the age of interprofessional care: a view from Canada. , 2008, Nursing inquiry.

[46]  L. G. Conn,et al.  Nursing emotion work and interprofessional collaboration in general internal medicine wards: a qualitative study. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.