How marketing research affects cycle time: a case of the telecommunications industry

Examines how marketing research affects cycle time (the time from product conceptualization to product introduction), in technology‐driven industries. The key research question to be examined in this study is: how do the collection, dissemination and utilization of marketing research information affect cycle time? Focuses on the telecommunications industry as an industry in which technology often drives the dynamics in the marketplace. Presents an empirical examination of the key research question in an exploratory study of hardware firms in the telecommunications industry. The results suggest that the collection of marketing research does not impact cycle time significantly. However, increased frequency of dissemination of the information collected via marketing research can increase cycle time. Finds also that, while the utilization ofmarketing research in designing products can increase cycle time, utilization of marketing research for strategy development can actually reduce cycle time. Thus, incorporation of marketing research in new product development can aid the introduction of new products in a timely manner.

[1]  R. Cooper,et al.  0 0 0 0 An Investigation into the New Product Process : Steps , Deficiencies , and Impact , 1986 .

[2]  Winning at New Products, by R. G. Cooper1 , 1986 .

[3]  John R. Ronchetto,et al.  Tracing Emergent Processes in Marketing Strategy Formation , 1988 .

[4]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[5]  D. Wilemon,et al.  Accelerating the Development of Technology-Based New Products , 1990 .

[6]  Nigel Hill Commodity products and stalemate industries: Is there a role for marketing? , 1990 .

[7]  Edward F. McDonough,et al.  Speeding Up New Product Development: The Effects of Leadership Style and Source of Technology , 1991 .

[8]  C. Crawford The Hidden Costs of Accelerated Product Development , 1992 .

[9]  V. Mahajan,et al.  New product models: Practice, shortcomings and desired improvements , 1992 .

[10]  R. Schmenner,et al.  Collapsing new product development times: Six case studies , 1992 .

[11]  A. Griffin,et al.  Patterns of Communication Among Marketing, Engineering and Manufacturing-A Comparison Between Two New Product Teams , 1992 .

[12]  Linda Rochford,et al.  How involving more functional areas within a firm affects the new product process , 1992 .

[13]  D. Wilemon,et al.  A Survey of Major Approaches for Accelerating New Product Development , 1992 .

[14]  A. Page Assessing New Product Development Practices and Performance: Establishing Crucial Norms , 1993 .

[15]  Adamantios Diamantopoulos,et al.  Marketing Research Activity and Company Performance: Evidence from Manufacturing Industry , 1993 .

[16]  N. Karagozoglu,et al.  Time‐Based Management of the New Product Development Process , 1993 .

[17]  A. Griffin Metrics for Measuring Product Development Cycle Time , 1993 .

[18]  Edward F. McDonough,et al.  Faster new product development: Investigating the effects of technology and characteristics of the project leader and team , 1993 .

[19]  P. Murmann Expected development time reductions in the German mechanical engineering industry , 1994 .

[20]  R. Cooper,et al.  Determinants of Timeliness in Product Development , 1994 .

[21]  B. J. Zirger,et al.  A conceptual model of product development cycle time , 1994 .

[22]  D. Mowery,et al.  Managing Product Definition in High-Technology Industries: A Pilot Study , 1994 .

[23]  C. Moorman Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes , 1995 .

[24]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Developing New Products On Time, In Time , 1995 .

[25]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  An exploratory analysis of the impact of market orientation on new product performance a contingency approach , 1995 .

[26]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[27]  Ajay K. Kohli,et al.  Market Intelligence Dissemination across Functional Boundaries , 1996 .

[28]  A. Chakrabarti,et al.  Innovation Speed: A Conceptual Model of Context, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 1996 .

[29]  A. Griffin The Effect of Project and Process Characteristics on Product Development Cycle Time , 1997 .

[30]  W. Moore,et al.  The Role of Market Information in New Product Success/Failure , 1997 .

[31]  Abbie Griffin Measuring Product Development to Improve the Quality of the Process , 1997 .

[32]  R. Calantone,et al.  New Product Activities and Performance: The Moderating Role of Environmental Hostility , 1997 .

[33]  D. Larcker,et al.  Product Development Cycle Time and Organizational Performance , 1997 .

[34]  Preston G. Smith From Experience : Reaping Benefit from Speed to Market , 1999 .

[35]  Kate D. Abel,et al.  Practices that Support Team Learning and Their Impact on Speed to Market and New Product Success , 1999 .

[36]  A. Chakrabarti,et al.  Speeding Up the Pace of New Product Development , 1999 .

[37]  Fred Langerak,et al.  A Laddering Approach to the Use of Methods and Techniques to Reduce the Cycle Time of New‐to‐the‐Firm Products , 1999 .

[38]  Christer Karlsson,et al.  Technological Level and Product Development Cycle Time , 1999 .

[39]  George M. Scott,et al.  Critical technology management issues of new product development in high-tech companies , 2000 .