Evaluation of roundness tolerance zone using measurements performed on manufactured parts: A probabilistic approach

Abstract In the verification of the compliance with dimensional and geometrical specifications of manufactured parts, the features are frequently sampled using Coordinate Measuring Machines. The evaluation of roundness tolerance zone by using measurements performed on cylindrical work pieces is specifically dealt with. Once a finite set of points is sampled, a fitting method is adopted to estimate the parameters of the reference circle. In particular, three different methods are considered, i.e. the usual Least Squares method, the so called Probabilistic Method, and the standardized Minimum Zone method. In order to have complete information on the reference features, knowledge of their uncertainty is required. Two uncertainty evaluation techniques are examined, i.e. a theoretical approach and the bootstrap method. Then, a new procedure based on the calculation of the probability density function of the width of roundness tolerance zone is developed. The practical application to the actual measurement of circular features on cylindrical holes allows to understand the differences between the results obtained with the presented approaches. Finally, the advantages of the probabilistic approach are highlighted.

[1]  Vijay Srinivasan,et al.  On the Enduring Appeal of Least-Squares Fitting in Computational Coordinate Metrology , 2012, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[2]  Abhijit Gosavi,et al.  Form Errors in Precision Metrology: A Survey of Measurement Techniques , 2012 .

[3]  Paolo Chiabert,et al.  Statistical Modelling of Nominal and Measured Mechanical Surfaces , 2003, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[4]  Keiji Miura,et al.  An Introduction to Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Information Geometry , 2011 .

[5]  Gianfranco Genta Methods for Uncertainty Evaluation in Measurement , 2010 .

[6]  Michael Ian Shamos,et al.  Computational geometry: an introduction , 1985 .

[7]  Zbigniew Humienny,et al.  State of art in standardization in GPS area , 2009 .

[8]  Vijay Srinivasan A geometrical product specification language based on a classification of symmetry groups , 1999, Comput. Aided Des..

[9]  Changcai Cui,et al.  Research on the uncertainties from different form error evaluation methods by CMM sampling , 2009 .

[10]  Michele Lanzetta,et al.  Fast genetic algorithm for roundness evaluation by the minimum zone tolerance (MZT) method , 2011 .

[11]  Wiebe R. Pestman,et al.  Mathematical Statistics: An Introduction , 1998 .

[12]  Soichiro Suzuki,et al.  Application of several computing techniques for minimum zone straightness , 1993 .

[13]  Sheldon M. Ross,et al.  Introduction to Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists , 1987 .

[14]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  An introduction to the bootstrap , 1993 .

[16]  Gianfranco Genta,et al.  Measurement uncertainty assessment of Coordinate Measuring Machines by simulation and planned experimentation , 2011 .

[17]  Eros Gian Alessandro Pasero,et al.  Detection of continuous symmetries in 3D objects from sparse measurements through probabilistic neural networks , 2001, VIMS 2001. 2001 IEEE International Workshop on Virtual and Intelligent Measurement Systems (IEEE Cat. No.01EX447).

[18]  Sung Joon Ahn,et al.  Least Squares Orthogonal Distance Fitting of Curves and Surfaces in Space , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[19]  B. Efron Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 1979 .

[20]  T. Kurfess,et al.  Sampling uncertainty in coordinate measurement data analysis , 1998 .

[21]  Martina Gandini,et al.  Analysis of influence of Verification strategy on Roundness error Evaluation , 2010 .

[22]  Francesco Ricci,et al.  Assessing measurement uncertainty in CMM measurements: comparison of different approaches , 2013 .

[23]  E. Parzen On Estimation of a Probability Density Function and Mode , 1962 .

[24]  Thomas R. Kurfess,et al.  Uncertainty of extreme fit evaluation for three-dimensional measurement data analysis , 1998, Comput. Aided Des..

[25]  Jochen Hiller,et al.  Measurement uncertainty evaluation in dimensional X-ray computed tomography using the bootstrap method , 2014 .