SummaryThe corneas of some nocturnal Lepidoptera carry an array of surface protuberances (nipples), about 200 mμ high, that acts as an impedance transformer equalizing by gradual transition the refractive index of air to that of the cornea. A screening of the insect class has been carried out in the present study with respect to the variation in corneal topography seen in previous obsarvations.361 species in most insect orders were prepared for EM by thin sectioning or platinum replication. Using the amplitude of the surface protuberances as parameter, a grouping of the cornea types was made on the basis of the well-defined variation of nipple heights observed between individuals of certain species. Thus, the corneas of one extreme group were either smooth (Fig. 4A) or possessed protrusions (Fig. 4B and C) less than about 50 mμ high, arranged either irregularly or in a regular, hexagonal array (group I). At the other extreme, there was a group with “full-sized” nipples (Figs. 1 and 3) ranging in amplitude around 250 mμ (group III). An intermediate group of nipple heights (group II) comprised corneas with “low-sized” nipples (Fig. 6) between 50 and about 200 mμ high. Regularity in the arrangement of the various types of protuberances was observed both in groups I and II (compare Figs. 4C and 8). Irregularity tended to be associated with low amplitudes (e.g. Fig. 4B), being found only in group I corneas.Full-sized nipples (group III corneas) were found only among the anagenetically highest orders, Trichoptera and Lepidoptera (Tables 3 and 4), which, however, also had corneas with low protrusions (group I) and low-sized nipples (group II). In one of the two mecopteroid orders, Diptera (Table 2), protrusions and low-sized nipples were found (the latter only in Culicomorpha). The corneas of all other orders (Table 1) had only group I corneas with one noteworthy exception, Thysanura, the most primitive order investigated. All four thysanuran species examined had corneas with low-sized nipples (Fig. 8), thus belonging to group II.The morphological findings demonstrated in the present study can be taken to illustrate the following trends.1.a)The higher relative number of group II and III corneas (low- and full-sized nipples) in the anagenetieally highest orders and the exclusive occurrence of group III corneas in the most advanced orders, Trichoptera and Lepidoptera, may indicate a progressive development of nipples during phylogenesis. Thus, the full-sized nipples may represent an apomorphous condition. Parallelisms — leading to the appearance of low- and full-sized nipples — may have occurred several times during insect phylogenetic development, thus possibly reflecting an evolutionary potential (with or without a selective pressure for this character).b)Low-sized nipples were found in the most primitive insect order, Thysanura. This circumstance may point to regression from full-sized nipples that were present in an ancestor common to all insects. In such a case, the full-sized nipples in Trichoptera and Lepidoptera are to be considered plesiomorphous.At present nothing supports conclusively a preference for one of these two alternatives.2.Among the Lepidoptera, a greater relative number of butterflies than moths lack full-sized nipples. This may be taken to indicate a regression of nipples in the day-flying group of insects in comparison with their possible moth-like, nocturnal ancestors. That in many species there are low-sized nipples (the regression thus being incomplete) may indicate that a function of the nipples in ranges of shorter wavelengths has brought about an arrest of the regression at lower amplitudes.
[1]
W. Hennig.
Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik
,
1950
.
[2]
M. Perry.
Further studies on the development of the eye of Drosophila melanogaster. I. The ommatidia
,
1968,
Journal of morphology.
[3]
A. Møller,et al.
FUNCTION OF THE CORNEAL NIPPLES IN THE COMPOUND EYES OF INSECTS.
,
1963,
Acta physiologica Scandinavica.
[4]
C. Bernhard,et al.
A corneal nipple pattern in insect compound eyes.
,
1962,
Acta Physiologica Scandinavica.
[5]
C. H. Waddington,et al.
The ultra-structure of the developing eye of Drosophila
,
1960,
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
[6]
A. Møller,et al.
THE INSECT CORNEAL NIPPLE ARRAY. A BIOLOGICA, BROAD-BAND IMPEDANCE TRANSFORMER THAT ACTS AS AN ANTIREFLECTION COATING.
,
1965,
Acta Physiologica Scandinavica Supplementum.
[7]
E. Mayr.
Animal Species and Evolution
,
1964
.
[8]
A R Moller,et al.
Modification of specular reflexion and light transmission by biological surface structures
,
1968,
Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.
[9]
G. D. Bernard,et al.
The optics of insect compound eyes.
,
1968,
Science.
[10]
W. Ricker.
Evolution and classification of the mountain caddisflies
,
1958
.
[11]
Ronald L. Taylor,et al.
Integumentary changes during moulting of arthropods with special reference to the subcuticle and ecdysial membrane
,
1965,
Journal of morphology.
[12]
G. Gemne.
Ultrastructural ontogenesis of cornea and corneal nipples in the compound eye of insects.
,
1966,
Acta physiologica Scandinavica.
[13]
M. Perry.
Further studies on the development of the eye of Drosophila melanogaster. II. The interommatidial bristles
,
1968
.
[14]
M. Locke.
The structure and formation of the cuticulin layer in the epicuticle of an insect, Calpodes ethlius (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae)
,
1966,
Journal of morphology.
[15]
H. Ross.
Evolution and classification of the mountain Caddis-flies
,
1963
.
[16]
W. Hennig.
Kritische Bemerkungen über den Bau der Flügelwurzel bei den Dipteren und die Frage nach der Monophylie der Nematocera
,
1968
.