Evaluation of the Revised International Staging System in an independent cohort of unselected patients with multiple myeloma

The Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) was recently introduced in order to improve risk stratification over that provided by the widely used standard International Staging System. In addition to the parameters of the standard system, the R-ISS incorporates the presence of chromosomal abnormalities detected by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization [t(4;14), t(14;16) and del17p] and elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase. The R-ISS was formulated on the basis of a large dataset of selected patients who had participated in clinical trials and has not been validated in an independent cohort of unselected patients. Thus, we evaluated the R-ISS in 475 consecutive, unselected patients, treated in a single center. Our patients were older and more often had severe renal dysfunction than those in the original publication on the R-ISS. As regards distribution by group, 18% had R-ISS-1, 64.5% R-ISS-2 and 18% R-ISS-3. According to R-ISS group, the 5-year survival rate was 77%, 53% and 19% for R-ISS-1, -2 and -3, respectively (P<0.001). The R-ISS could identify three groups with distinct outcomes among patients treated with or without autologous stem cell transplantation, among those treated with either bortezomib-based or immunomodulatory drug-based primary therapy and in patients ≤65, 66–75 or >75 years. However, in patients with severe renal dysfunction the distinction between groups was less clear. In conclusion, our data in consecutive, unselected patients, with differences in the characteristics and treatment approaches compared to the original International Myeloma Working Group cohort, verified that R-ISS is a robust tool for risk stratification of newly diagnosed patients with symptomatic myeloma.

[1]  H. Goldschmidt,et al.  Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: A Report From International Myeloma Working Group. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Myeloma in the Octogenarians: Disease Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes in the Era of Modern Anti-Myeloma Therapy , 2014 .

[3]  P. Sonneveld,et al.  Report from the European Myeloma Network on interphase FISH in multiple myeloma and related disorders , 2012, Haematologica.

[4]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Increased serum lactate dehydrongenase should be included among the variables that define very-high-risk multiple myeloma. , 2011, Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia.

[5]  H. Avet-Loiseau,et al.  The impact of genomics on the management of myeloma. , 2011, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[6]  J. Shaughnessy,et al.  Consensus recommendations for risk stratification in multiple myeloma: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 2. , 2011, Blood.

[7]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  High serum lactate dehydrogenase adds prognostic value to the international myeloma staging system even in the era of novel agents , 2010, European journal of haematology.

[8]  H. Avet-Loiseau Role of genetics in prognostication in myeloma. , 2007, Best practice & research. Clinical haematology.

[9]  G. Morgan,et al.  Age has a profound effect on the incidence and significance of chromosome abnormalities in myeloma , 2005, Leukemia.

[10]  J. Crowley,et al.  International staging system for multiple myeloma. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  Bart Barlogie,et al.  Genetics and Cytogenetics of Multiple Myeloma , 2004, Cancer Research.

[12]  Terry L. Smith,et al.  High serum lactate dehydrogenase level as a marker for drug resistance and short survival in multiple myeloma. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[13]  S. Salmon,et al.  A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival , 1975, Cancer.