Metacognitive Control and Optimal Learning

The notion of optimality is often invoked informally in the literature on metacognitive control. We provide a precise formulation of the optimization problem and show that optimal time allocation strategies depend critically on certain characteristics of the learning environment, such as the extent of time pressure, and the nature of the uptake function. When the learning curve is concave, optimality requires that items at lower levels of initial competence be allocated greater time. On the other hand, with logistic learning curves, optimal allocations vary with time availability in complex and surprising ways. Hence there are conditions under which optimal strategies will be relatively easy to uncover, and others in which suboptimal time allocation might be expected. The model can therefore be used to address the question of whether and when learners should be able to exercise good metacognitive control in practice.

[1]  Lisa K. Son,et al.  Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  K. Newell,et al.  Time scales in motor learning and development. , 2001, Psychological review.

[3]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect self-paced study. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[4]  Michael D. Intriligator,et al.  Mathematical optimization and economic theory , 1971 .

[5]  Lisa K. Son,et al.  Spacing one's study: evidence for a metacognitive control strategy. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  Paul van Geert,et al.  A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. , 1991 .

[7]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  A Region of Proximal Learning Model of Study Time Allocation Journal of Memory and Language , 2005 .

[8]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Utilization of Metacognitive Judgments in the Allocation of Study During Multitrial Learning , 1994 .

[9]  Douglas J. Hacker,et al.  Metacognition in educational theory and practice. , 1998 .

[10]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Reflections of the Environment in Memory Form of the Memory Functions , 2022 .

[11]  R. Siegler,et al.  Mechanisms of cognitive development. , 1989, Annual review of psychology.

[12]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Training Programs to Improve Learning in Later Adulthood: Helping Older Adults Educate Themselves , 1998 .

[13]  C. L. Hull Principles of behavior : an introduction to behavior theory , 1943 .

[14]  T. O. Nelson Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings , 1990 .

[15]  Cesare Cornoldi,et al.  Strategies in study time allocation: Why is study time sometimes not effective? , 1993 .

[16]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Why investigate metacognition , 1994 .

[17]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control of study , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[18]  A. Klopf A neuronal model of classical conditioning , 1988 .

[19]  M L Rice,et al.  Tense over time: the longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairment. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[20]  H. Simon,et al.  Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought , 1978 .

[21]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Metacognition : knowing about knowing , 1994 .

[22]  William L. Cull,et al.  The learning ability paradox in adult metamemory research: Where are the metamemory differences between good and poor learners? , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[23]  G Mazzoni,et al.  Do memorability ratings affect study-time allocation? , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[24]  C. Noble The length-difficulty relationship in compound trial-and-error learning. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  Nate Kornell,et al.  The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  P. W. Frey,et al.  Model of conditioning incorporating the Rescorla-Wagner associative axiom, a dynamic attention process, and a catastrophe rule. , 1978 .

[27]  Guy Denhière,et al.  Regulation of study-time and interstimulus similarity in self-paced learning conditions , 1972 .

[28]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect". , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  Janet Metcalfe,et al.  Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. , 1999 .

[31]  R. Atkinson Optimizing the Learning of a Second-Language Vocabulary. , 1972 .