Business ecosystems : A research framework for investigating the relation between network structure , firm strategy , and the pattern of innovation diffusion

This paper introduces a research framework to study the relation between network structure, firm strategy and the pattern of innovation diffusion. The framework builds on the following notions: 1) that economic agents are embedded in social networks, 2) that the decisions they take are at least partly dependent on the actions or opinions of other agents, 3) that this network structure influences market dynamics, 4) that firms and consumers engage these market dynamics by forming coalitions that we refer to as ‘business ecosystems’, 5) that key firms in such business ecosystems are able to influence the relation between the network structure and market dynamics by exercising network governance and 6) that firms in such business ecosystems are able to influence the relation between the market dynamics and their own performance by choosing the right strategy. 1 Contact information: drs. Erik den Hartigh, assistant professor, Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, section Technology, Strategy and Entrepreneurship, Office c2.170, P.O. Box 5015, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands, phone +31 15 278 3565, email e.denhartigh@tbm.tudelft.nl

[1]  Michael Schwartz,et al.  The structural embeddedness of business decisions : the migration of manufacturing plants in New York State, 1960 to 1985 , 1995 .

[2]  Kenneth W. Koput,et al.  Software variety and hardware value: A case study of complementary network externalities in the microcomputer software industry , 1998 .

[3]  Chong Ju Choi,et al.  Increasing Returns and Social Contagion in Cultural Industries , 1999 .

[4]  Stephen E. Margolis,et al.  Network externality : an uncommon tragedy , 1994 .

[5]  William H. RedmondP When Technologies Compete: The Role of Externalities in Nonlinear Market Response , 1991 .

[6]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .

[7]  Sumit K. Majumdar,et al.  Network effects and the adoption of new technology: evidence from the U.S. telecommunications industry , 1998 .

[8]  R. Jacobson,et al.  Market Share and Customers’ Perceptions of Quality: When Can Firms Grow Their Way to Higher versus Lower Quality? , 1999 .

[9]  H. Leibenstein Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand , 1950 .

[10]  Linda L. Price,et al.  The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. , 1987 .

[11]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Dyadic Business Relationships within a Business Network Context , 1994 .

[13]  Jonathan K. Frenzen,et al.  Purchasing Behavior in Embedded Markets , 1990 .

[14]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Information Sources used during the Industrial Buying Process , 1984 .

[15]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Installed base and compatibility : innovation, product preannouncements and predation , 1986 .

[16]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[17]  D. North Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[18]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization , 1994 .

[19]  Robin Cowan,et al.  A Model of Demand with Interactions Among Consumers , 1997 .

[20]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.