Structural Basis for the Differential Regulation of DNA by the Methionine Repressor MetJ*

The Met regulon in Escherichia coli encodes several proteins responsible for the biosynthesis of methionine. Regulation of the expression of most of these proteins is governed by the methionine repressor protein MetJ and its co-repressor, the methionine derivative S-adenosylmethionine. Genes controlled by MetJ contain from two to five sequential copies of a homologous 8-bp sequence called the metbox. A crystal structure for one of the complexes, the repressor tetramer bound to two metboxes, has been reported (Somers, W. S., and S. E. Phillips (1992) Nature 359, 387-393), but little structural work on the larger assemblies has been done presumably because of the difficulties in crystallization and the variability in the number and sequences of metboxes for the various genes. Small angle neutron scattering was used to study complexes of MetJ and S-adenosylmethionine with double-stranded DNA containing two, three, and five metboxes. Our results demonstrate that the crystal structure of the two-metbox complex is not the native solution conformation of the complex. Instead, the system adopts a less compact conformation in which there is decreased interaction between the adjacent MetJ dimers. Models built of the higher order complexes from the scattering data show that the three-metbox complex is organized much like the two-metbox complex. However, the five-metbox complex differs significantly from the smaller complexes, providing much closer packing of the adjacent MetJ dimers and allowing additional contacts not available in the crystal structure. The results suggest that there is a structural basis for the differences observed in the regulatory effectiveness of MetJ for the various genes of the Met regulon.

[1]  G N Cohen,et al.  Interactions of the Escherichia coli methionine repressor with the metF operator and with its corepressor, S-adenosylmethionine. , 1986, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[2]  H M Berman,et al.  A standard reference frame for the description of nucleic acid base-pair geometry. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  S. Phillips,et al.  Regulation of methionine biosynthesis in the Enterobacteriaceae. , 1991, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[4]  Peter G Stockley,et al.  Kinetic analysis of operator binding by the E. coli methionine repressor highlights the role(s) of electrostatic interactions , 2004, FEBS letters.

[5]  A A Smith,et al.  Isolation and characterization of the product of the methionine-regulatory gene metJ of Escherichia coli K-12. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  R. Shoeman,et al.  Regulation of methionine synthesis in Escherichia coli: Effect of metJ gene product and S-adenosylmethionine on the expression of the metF gene. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  David C. Richardson,et al.  MOLPROBITY: structure validation and all-atom contact analysis for nucleic acids and their complexes , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  S. Phillips,et al.  Effects of systematic variation of the minimal Escherichia coli met consensus operator site: in vivo and in vitro met repressor binding , 1996, Molecular microbiology.

[9]  J. Trewhella,et al.  Further insights into calmodulin-myosin light chain kinase interaction from solution scattering and shape restoration. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[10]  Larry Gold,et al.  In VitroEvolution of the DNA Binding Sites ofEscherichia coliMethionine Repressor, MetJ , 1996 .

[11]  Peter G. Stockley,et al.  Probing met represser–operator recognition in solution , 1992, Nature.

[12]  William J. Orts,et al.  The 30 m Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Instruments at the National Institute of Standards and Technology , 1998 .

[13]  S. Phillips,et al.  Structural and functional studies of an intermediate on the pathway to operator binding by Escherichia coli MetJ. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  R. Schnell,et al.  The metDd-Methionine Transporter Locus of Escherichia coli Is an ABC Transporter Gene Cluster , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[15]  Peter G Stockley,et al.  Transcript analysis reveals an extended regulon and the importance of protein-protein co-operativity for the Escherichia coli methionine repressor. , 2006, The Biochemical journal.

[16]  B. E. Davidson,et al.  Cooperative tandem binding of met repressor of Escherichia coli , 1989, Nature.

[17]  M. Brillouin,et al.  La diffraction des rayons X aux très petits angles: application a l'étude de phénomènes ultramicroscopiques , 1939 .

[18]  S. Phillips,et al.  Crystal structure of the met represser–operator complex at 2.8 Å resolution reveals DNA recognition by β-strands , 1992, Nature.

[19]  D. Hyre,et al.  Thermodynamic evaluation of binding interactions in the methionine repressor system of Escherichia coli using isothermal titration calorimetry. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[20]  P. B. Moore,et al.  Small-angle scattering. Information content and error analysis , 1980 .

[21]  S. Phillips,et al.  Three-dimensional crystal structures of Escherichia coli met repressor with and without corepressor , 1989, Nature.

[22]  B. E. Davidson,et al.  The Escherichia coli regulatory protein MetJ binds to a tandemly repeated 8bp palindrome , 1989, Molecular microbiology.

[23]  F. Bates,et al.  Absolute calibration of small‐angle neutron scattering data , 1987 .

[24]  M. Urbanowski,et al.  MetJ-mediated regulation of the Salmonella typhimurium metE and metR genes occurs through a common operator region. , 1993, FEMS microbiology letters.

[25]  G N Cohen,et al.  Evolution in biosynthetic pathways: two enzymes catalyzing consecutive steps in methionine biosynthesis originate from a common ancestor and possess a similar regulatory region. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.