A machine learning enabled network planning tool

In the coming years, planning future mobile networks will be infinitely more complex than nowadays. Future networks are expected to present multiple Network Management (NM) challenges to operators, such as managing network complexity in terms of densification of scenarios, heterogeneous nodes, applications, Radio Access Technologies (RAT), among others. In this context, the exploitation of past information gathered by the network is highly relevant when planning future deployments. In this paper we present a network planning tool based on Machine Learning (ML). In particular, we propose an approach which allows to predict Quality of Service (QoS) offered to end-users, based on data collected by the Minimization of Drive Tests (MDT) function. As a QoS indicator, we focus on Physical Resource Block (PRB) per Megabit (Mb) in an arbitrary point of the network. Minimizing this metric allows serving users with the same QoS by consuming less resources, and therefore, being more cost-effective. The proposed network planning tool considers a Genetic Algorithm (GA), which tries to reach the operator targets. The network parameters we desire to optimise are set as the input to the algorithm. Then, we predict the QoS of the network by means of ML techniques. By integrating these techniques in a network planning tool, operators would be able to find the most appropriate deployment layout, by minimizing the resources (i.e., the cost) they need to deploy to offer a given QoS in a newly planned deployment.

[1]  Thomas G. Dietterich.  An Experimental Comparison of Three Methods for Constructing Ensembles of Decision Trees: Bagging, Boosting, and Randomization , 2000, Machine Learning.

[2]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[3]  Muhammad Ali Imran,et al.  A Cell Outage Management Framework for Dense Heterogeneous Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[4]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Random Search for Hyper-Parameter Optimization , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[5]  Josep Mangues-Bafalluy,et al.  On the potential of ensemble regression techniques for future mobile network planning , 2016, 2016 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communication (ISCC).

[6]  Josep Mangues-Bafalluy,et al.  Big Data Empowered Self Organized Networks , 2014 .

[7]  Johan Johansson,et al.  Minimization of drive tests in 3GPP release 11 , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8]  Jani Puttonen,et al.  User satisfaction classification for Minimization of Drive Tests QoS verification , 2013, 2013 IEEE 24th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[9]  Josep Mangues-Bafalluy,et al.  Predicting QoS in LTE HetNets based on location-independent UE measurements , 2015, 2015 IEEE 20th International Workshop on Computer Aided Modelling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD).

[10]  Lorenza Giupponi,et al.  A Reinforcement Learning Based Solution for Self-Healing in LTE Networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE 80th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2014-Fall).

[11]  Henning Sanneck,et al.  LTE Self-Organising Networks (SON): Network Management Automation for Operational Efficiency , 2012 .

[12]  Anders Furuskar,et al.  Downtilted Base Station Antennas - A Simulation Model Proposal and Impact on HSPA and LTE Performance , 2008, 2008 IEEE 68th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[13]  Sam T. Roweis,et al.  EM Algorithms for PCA and SPCA , 1997, NIPS.

[14]  Jin Yang,et al.  Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (EUTRAN) , 2017 .