Corneal biomechanical outcome of collagen cross-linking in keratoconic patients evaluated by Corvis ST

Purpose: A 6-month evaluation of the topographic and biomechanical changes induced by corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) in keratoconic eyes using Pentacam and Corvis ST. Design: Longitudinal prospective case series. Methods: In this study, 67 eyes of 67 patients with progressive keratoconus (KCN) treated with “Epithelium-off” CXL were evaluated. Patients with stages 1 or 2 of KCN and a corneal thickness of at least 400 μm at the thinnest point were included. Standard ophthalmologic examinations were carried out for all patients. The topographic and biomechanical measurements of the cornea were obtained by Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and Corvis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) preoperatively and 6-month postoperatively. Results: The mean age of the participants was 21.68 ± 4.23 years. There was significant difference in mean spherical equivalent (SE) before and 6 months after CXL. Uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity improved postoperatively, although not statistically significant. The mean and maximum keratometry showed a significant decrease 6 months after CXL (0.93 ± 0.38 D and 1.43 ± 0.62 D, respectively p < 0.001). Among Corvis ST parameters, first applanation length and velocity (AL1 and AV1) showed statistically significant changes. The radius at highest concavity changed significantly (0.13 ± 0.37 mm mean increase after CXL; p < 0.001). A significant increase was observed in stiffness parameter A1 (SP-A1; p < 0.001) and significant decreases were noted in integrated radius (IR) and deformation amplitude ratio (DAR; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Analyzing biomechanical changes after corneal cross-linking can provide basis for efficient KCN treatment. Corvis ST parameters demonstrated changes in corneal biomechanical characteristics indicative of stiffing after CXL.

[1]  H. Hashemi,et al.  Two-year changes in corneal stiffness parameters after accelerated corneal cross-linking. , 2019, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  R. Salouti,et al.  Assessment of the changes in corneal biomechanical properties after collagen cross-linking in patients with keratoconus , 2019, Journal of current ophthalmology.

[3]  M. Batterbury,et al.  Assessment of the Association Between In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Corneal Cross-linking and Depth of Demarcation Line. , 2019, Journal of refractive surgery.

[4]  Renato Ambrósio,et al.  Long-term Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties After Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study. , 2018, Journal of refractive surgery.

[5]  M. Batterbury,et al.  In Vivo Early Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Corneal Cross-linking in Patients With Progressive Keratoconus. , 2017, Journal of refractive surgery.

[6]  C. Nicula,et al.  Results at 7years after cross-linking procedure in keratoconic patients. , 2017, Journal francais d'ophtalmologie.

[7]  Ahmed Elsheikh,et al.  Integration of Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments for Enhancing Ectasia Detection. , 2017, Journal of refractive surgery.

[8]  H. Hashemi,et al.  Keratoconus diagnosis using Corvis ST measured biomechanical parameters , 2017, Journal of current ophthalmology.

[9]  A. Elsheikh,et al.  Introduction of Two Novel Stiffness Parameters and Interpretation of Air Puff-Induced Biomechanical Deformation Parameters With a Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer. , 2017, Journal of refractive surgery.

[10]  Bernardo T. Lopes,et al.  Detection of Keratoconus With a New Biomechanical Index. , 2016, Journal of refractive surgery.

[11]  Bernardo T. Lopes,et al.  Influence of Pachymetry and Intraocular Pressure on Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters in Healthy Patients. , 2016, Journal of refractive surgery.

[12]  Liat Shenhav,et al.  Efficacy of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for the Treatment of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2016, Cornea.

[13]  A. Frings,et al.  New Scheimpflug Dynamic In Vivo Curve Analyses to Characterize Biomechanical Changes of the Cornea After Cross-linking for Progressive Keratoconus. , 2016, Journal of refractive surgery.

[14]  D. Patel,et al.  Biomechanical properties of the keratoconic cornea: a review , 2015, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[15]  D. Gatinel The mystery of collagen cross-linking when it comes to in vivo biomechanical measurements. , 2014, Journal of refractive surgery.

[16]  Gabor Nemeth,et al.  Examination of ocular biomechanics with a new Scheimpflug technology after corneal refractive surgery. , 2014, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[17]  Sashia Bak-Nielsen,et al.  Dynamic Scheimpflug-based assessment of keratoconus and the effects of corneal cross-linking. , 2014, Journal of refractive surgery.

[18]  Tukezban Huseynova,et al.  Accelerated versus conventional corneal collagen crosslinking , 2014, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[19]  Zygmunt Wróbel,et al.  Overview of the Ocular Biomechanical Properties Measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST , 2014 .

[20]  A. Fotouhi,et al.  Corneal collagen cross-linking with riboflavin and ultraviolet a irradiation for keratoconus: long-term results. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[21]  R. Vinciguerra,et al.  Corneal cross-linking as a treatment for keratoconus: four-year morphologic and clinical outcomes with respect to patient age. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[22]  Michael W. Belin,et al.  Dynamic ultra high speed Scheimpflug imaging for assessing corneal biomechanical properties , 2013 .

[23]  K. Meek,et al.  Corneal cross‐linking – a review , 2013, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[24]  Y. Mandel,et al.  Clinical and Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Collagen Cross-Linking With Riboflavin and UV Irradiation in Patients With Progressive Keratoconus: Results After 2 Years of Follow-up , 2012, Cornea.

[25]  S. Greenstein,et al.  In Vivo Biomechanical Changes After Corneal Collagen Cross-linking for Keratoconus and Corneal Ectasia: 1-Year Analysis of a Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial , 2012, Cornea.

[26]  G. Labiris,et al.  Evaluation of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor after corneal cross-linking for keratoconus , 2012, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[27]  S. Sel,et al.  Interlamellar cohesion after corneal crosslinking using riboflavin and ultraviolet A light , 2011, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[28]  S. Greenstein,et al.  Corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: One‐year results , 2011, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[29]  Mostafa Naderi,et al.  Biomechanical parameters of the cornea after collagen crosslinking measured by waveform analysis , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[30]  Dilraj S. Grewal,et al.  Corneal collagen crosslinking using riboflavin and ultraviolet‐A light for keratoconus: One‐year analysis using Scheimpflug imaging , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[31]  G. Wollensak,et al.  Long‐term biomechanical properties of rabbit cornea after photodynamic collagen crosslinking , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica.

[32]  Ecosse Lamoureux,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus: preliminary results. , 2008, Journal of refractive surgery.

[33]  Marquette Method,et al.  EFFICACY OF THE , 2008 .

[34]  J. Alió,et al.  Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post‐laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[35]  Cristina Tommasi,et al.  Treatment of Progressive Keratoconus by Riboflavin-UVA-Induced Cross-Linking of Corneal Collagen: Ultrastructural Analysis by Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph II In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Humans , 2007, Cornea.

[36]  A. Elsheikh,et al.  Assessment of Corneal Biomechanical Properties and Their Variation with Age , 2007, Current eye research.

[37]  Eberhard Spoerl,et al.  Biomechanical evidence of the distribution of cross‐links in corneastreated with riboflavin and ultraviolet A light , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[38]  M. Gordon,et al.  Longitudinal changes in visual acuity in keratoconus. , 2006, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science.

[39]  D. Luce Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[40]  T. Seiler,et al.  Stress‐strain measurements of human and porcine corneas after riboflavin–ultraviolet‐A‐induced cross‐linking , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[41]  T. Seiler,et al.  Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. , 2003, American journal of ophthalmology.

[42]  L. Thibos,et al.  Power vector analysis of the optical outcome of refractive surgery , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[43]  H. Oxlund,et al.  Biomechanical properties of keratoconus and normal corneas. , 1980, Experimental eye research.

[44]  M. Amsler,et al.  Kératocône classique et kératocône fruste; arguments unitaires , 1946 .