The role of forward osmosis and microfiltration in an integrated osmotic-microfiltration membrane bioreactor system.

This study investigates the performance of an integrated osmotic and microfiltration membrane bioreactor (O/MF-MBR) system for wastewater treatment and reclamation. The O/MF-MBR system simultaneously used microfiltration (MF) and forward osmosis (FO) membranes to extract water from the mixed liquor of an aerobic bioreactor. The MF membrane facilitated the bleeding of dissolved inorganic salts and thus prevented the build-up of salinity in the bioreactor. As a result, sludge production and microbial activity were relatively stable over 60 days of operation. Compared to MF, the FO process produced a better permeate quality in terms of nutrients, total organic carbon, as well as hydrophilic and biologically persistent trace organic chemicals (TrOCs). The high rejection by the FO membrane also led to accumulation of hydrophilic and biologically persistent TrOCs in the bioreactor, consequently increasing their concentration in the MF permeate. On the other hand, hydrophobic and readily biodegradable TrOCs were minimally detected in both MF and FO permeates, with no clear difference in the removal efficiencies between two processes.

[1]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes , 2009 .

[2]  Guanglei Qiu,et al.  Direct phosphorus recovery from municipal wastewater via osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) for wastewater treatment. , 2014, Bioresource technology.

[3]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Cake-enhanced concentration polarization: a new fouling mechanism for salt-rejecting membranes. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Colloidal fouling in forward osmosis: Role of reverse salt diffusion , 2012 .

[5]  Damià Barceló,et al.  Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment. , 2009, Water research.

[6]  Thomas Melin,et al.  Options for water scarcity and drought management—the role of desalination , 2010 .

[7]  P. Luis,et al.  Forward osmosis: understanding the hype , 2015 .

[8]  B. Bilitewski,et al.  Effects of fouling and scaling on the retention of trace organic contaminants by a nanofiltration membrane: The role of cake-enhanced concentration polarisation , 2010 .

[9]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Removal of natural hormones by nanofiltration membranes: measurement, modeling, and mechanisms. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Long D. Nghiem,et al.  NF/RO filtration of the hydrophobic ionogenic compound triclosan : Transport mechanisms and the influence of membrane fouling , 2008 .

[11]  P. Anderson,et al.  Designing monitoring programs for chemicals of emerging concern in potable reuse--what to include and what not to include? , 2012, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[12]  Yueping Ren,et al.  Integration of micro-filtration into osmotic membrane bioreactors to prevent salinity build-up. , 2014, Bioresource technology.

[13]  B. Sridhar,et al.  Transfer of wastewater associated pharmaceuticals and personal care products to crop plants from biosolids treated soil. , 2012, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[14]  W. Phillip,et al.  Ion selective permeation through cellulose acetate membranes in forward osmosis. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Ryota Shinohara,et al.  Plant uptake of pharmaceutical chemicals detected in recycled organic manure and reclaimed wastewater. , 2012, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[16]  Long D Nghiem,et al.  Removal of trace organics by MBR treatment: the role of molecular properties. , 2011, Water research.

[17]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Nanofiltration of Hormone Mimicking Trace Organic Contaminants , 2005 .

[18]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Removal of trace organic contaminants by the forward osmosis process , 2013 .

[19]  Jae-Hoon Choi,et al.  Comparison of sludge characteristics and PCR-DGGE based microbial diversity of nanofiltration and microfiltration membrane bioreactors. , 2007, Chemosphere.

[20]  Juan D. Gomez,et al.  Towards direct potable reuse with forward osmosis: Technical assessment of long-term process performance at the pilot scale , 2013 .

[21]  Anthony G Fane,et al.  Impacts of salinity on the performance of high retention membrane bioreactors for water reclamation: A review. , 2010, Water research.

[22]  H. Kanazawa,et al.  Stereospecific analysis of omeprazole in human plasma as a probe for CYP2C19 phenotype. , 2003, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[23]  Sher Jamal Khan,et al.  Microbial toxicity effects of reverse transported draw solute in the forward osmosis membrane bioreactor (FO-MBR) , 2013 .

[24]  T. Melin,et al.  Emerging contaminants and treatment options in water recycling for indirect potable use. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[25]  Long D. Nghiem,et al.  Removal of micropollutants by membrane bioreactor under temperature variation , 2011 .

[26]  Tzahi Y. Cath,et al.  Long-term pilot scale investigation of novel hybrid ultrafiltration-osmotic membrane bioreactors , 2015 .

[27]  S. Rosenberger,et al.  Influence of sludge retention time on membrane bioreactor hydraulic performance , 2006 .

[28]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Removal of trace organic chemicals and performance of a novel hybrid ultrafiltration-osmotic membrane bioreactor. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  Tae-Hyun Bae,et al.  Influence of sludge retention time on membrane fouling and bioactivities in membrane bioreactor system , 2005 .

[30]  Yueping Ren,et al.  Impacts of sludge retention time on sludge characteristics and membrane fouling in a submerged osmotic membrane bioreactor. , 2014, Bioresource technology.

[31]  Faisal I. Hai,et al.  Membrane biological reactors : theory, modeling, design, management and applications to wastewater reuse , 2013 .

[32]  Anne Roiko,et al.  Contaminants of concern in recycled water , 2010 .

[33]  Patricia Luis Alconero,et al.  Forward osmosis: Understanding the hype , 2015 .

[34]  Long D. Nghiem,et al.  Water extraction from mixed liquor of an aerobic bioreactor by forward osmosis: Membrane fouling and biomass characteristics assessment , 2015 .

[35]  Rong Wang,et al.  Effect of Pharmaceuticals on the Performance of a Novel Osmotic Membrane Bioreactor (OMBR) , 2012 .

[36]  Jinguo Kang,et al.  Removal of trace organic contaminants by a membrane bioreactor-granular activated carbon (MBR-GAC) system. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[37]  A. Schäffer,et al.  Factors affecting the removal of organic micropollutants from wastewater in conventional treatment plants (CTP) and membrane bioreactors (MBR) , 2008 .

[38]  Long D Nghiem,et al.  Performance of a novel osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) system: flux stability and removal of trace organics. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[39]  E R Cornelissen,et al.  The innovative osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) for reuse of wastewater. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[40]  H. Ngo,et al.  A review on the occurrence of micropollutants in the aquatic environment and their fate and removal during wastewater treatment. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[41]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. , 2007, Water research.

[42]  Guanglei Qiu,et al.  Osmotic membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment and the effect of salt accumulation on system performance and microbial community dynamics. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[43]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Rejection of trace organic compounds by forward osmosis membranes: a literature review. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[44]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of membrane support layer hydrophobicity on water flux in osmotically driven membrane processes , 2008 .