Publication bias is a scientific problem with adverse ethical outcomes: the case for a section for null results.

Thecommunication of research findings is one of our most important functions. Not communicating research findings can be harmful in many ways. Publication bias is a well-known phenomenon that affects cancer epidemiology, biomarker research, and cancer prevention. As these areas grow, along with the

[1]  P. Sleight,et al.  Publication bias , 1991, The Lancet.

[2]  R. Simes,et al.  Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects , 1997, BMJ.

[3]  W. McIlroy,et al.  Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses? Current convictions and controversies. , 1993, JAMA.

[4]  I. Olkin,et al.  Models for estimating the number of unpublished studies. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  P. Easterbrook,et al.  Publication bias in clinical research , 1991, The Lancet.

[6]  A. B. Hill.  The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? , 1965, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[7]  R. Morris.  Meta-analysis in cancer epidemiology. , 1994, Environmental health perspectives.

[8]  R Elvik,et al.  Evaluating the statistical conclusion validity of weighted mean results in meta-analysis by analysing funnel graph diagrams. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  M. Levois,et al.  Publication bias in the environmental tobacco smoke/coronary heart disease epidemiologic literature. , 1995, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[10]  K. Dickersin.  How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. , 1997, AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education.

[11]  R. Simes.  Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. , 1986, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  J P Vandenbroucke,et al.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1998 .

[13]  R. Wears,et al.  Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. , 1998, JAMA.

[14]  K. Dickersin,et al.  Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. , 1994 .

[15]  R. Horton.  Medical Editors Trial Amnesty , 1997, The Lancet.

[16]  C. Begg,et al.  Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. , 1994, Biometrics.

[17]  T. Cleophas,et al.  Is selective reporting of clinical research unethical as well as unscientific? , 1999, International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[18]  K. Dickersin,et al.  Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. , 1992, JAMA.

[19]  D. Allison,et al.  Publication bias in obesity treatment trials? , 1996, International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders : journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[20]  C B Begg,et al.  A measure to aid in the interpretation of published clinical trials. , 1985, Statistics in medicine.

[21]  C. J. Bettinger.  Publication Bias and the Editorial Process , 1992 .

[22]  L. Bero,et al.  Publication bias and research on passive smoking: comparison of published and unpublished studies. , 1998, JAMA.

[23]  Berlin Ja.  Will publication bias vanish in the age of online journals , 1992 .

[24]  P. Gøtzsche.  Reference bias in reports of drug trials. , 1987, British medical journal.

[25]  L. Rubenstein,et al.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Asymmetry detected in funnel plot was probably due to true heterogeneity. , 1998, BMJ.

[26]  M. Parmar,et al.  Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? , 1993, The Lancet.