Clinical evaluation and treatment accuracy in diabetic macular edema using navigated laser photocoagulator NAVILAS.

PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical use and accuracy of a new retinal navigating laser technology that integrates a scanning slit fundus camera system with fluorescein angiography (FA), color, red-free, and infrared imaging capabilities with a computer steerable therapeutic 532-nm laser. DESIGN Interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS Eighty-six eyes of 61 patients with diabetic retinopathy and macular edema treated by NAVILAS. METHODS The imaging included digital color fundus photographs and FA. The planning included graphically marking future treatment sites (microaneurysms for single-spot focal treatment and areas of diffuse leakage for grid pattern photocoagulation) on the acquired images. The preplanned treatment was visible and overlaid on the live fundus image during the actual photocoagulation. The NAVILAS automatically advances the aiming beam location from one planned treatment site to the next after each photocoagulation spot until all sites are treated. Aiming beam stabilization compensated for patient's eye movements. The pretreatment FA with the treatment plan was overlaid on top of the posttreatment color fundus images with the actual laser burns. This allowed treatment accuracy to be calculated. Independent observers evaluated the images to determine if the retinal opacification after treatment overlapped the targeted microaneurysm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Safety and accuracy of laser photocoagulation. RESULTS The images were of very good quality compared with standard fundus cameras, allowing careful delineation of target areas on FA. Toggling from infrared, to monochromatic, to color view allowed evaluation and adjustment of burn intensity during treatment. There were no complications during or after photocoagulation treatment. An analysis of accuracy of 400 random focal targeted spots found that the NAVILAS achieved a microaneurysm hit rate of 92% when the placement of the treatment circle was centered by the operating surgeon on the microaneurysm. The accuracy for the control group analyzing 100 focal spots was significantly lower at 72% (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Laser photocoagulation using the NAVILAS system is safe and achieves a higher rate of accuracy in photocoagulation treatments of diabetic retinopathy lesions than standard manual-technique laser treatment. Precise manual preplanning and positioning of the treatment sites by the surgeon is possible, allowing accurate and predictable photocoagulation of these lesions. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

[1]  Lloyd Paul Aiello,et al.  Comparison of the modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study and mild macular grid laser photocoagulation strategies for diabetic macular edema. , 2007, Archives of ophthalmology.

[2]  M. Mainster,et al.  Subthreshold diode micropulse photocoagulation for the treatment of clinically significant diabetic macular oedema , 2004, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[3]  Sangita Marlecha COMPARISON OF LASER PHOTOCOAGULATION FOR DIABETIC RETINOPATHY USING 532-NM STANDARD LASER VERSUS MULTISPOT PATTERN SCAN LASER , 2010, Retina.

[4]  C Sanghvi,et al.  Initial experience with the Pascal photocoagulator: a pilot study of 75 procedures , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[5]  Y. Yang,et al.  An automated laser system for eye surgery , 1989, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[6]  S. Yamamoto,et al.  Functional and morphological changes of macula after subthreshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular oedema , 2010, Eye.

[7]  S F Barrett,et al.  Development of an integrated automated retinal surgical laser system. , 1997, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.

[8]  R. Klein,et al.  The 14-year incidence of visual loss in a diabetic population. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[9]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Effect of pulse duration on size and character of the lesion in retinal photocoagulation. , 2008, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  Lloyd Paul Aiello A randomized trial comparing intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and focal/grid photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[11]  M. Blumenkranz Optimal current and future treatments for diabetic macular oedema , 2010, Eye.

[12]  C M Moorman,et al.  Clinical applications of the MicroPulse diode laser , 1999, Eye.

[13]  T. Peto,et al.  A prospective randomized trial of intravitreal bevacizumab or laser therapy in the management of diabetic macular edema (BOLT study) 12-month data: report 2. , 2010, Ophthalmology.

[14]  Judy E. Kim,et al.  Three-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing focal/grid photocoagulation and intravitreal triamcinolone for diabetic macular edema. , 2009, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  Tatsuo Yamaguchi,et al.  Subthreshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema in Japanese patients. , 2010, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  P Edwards Randomized trial evaluating ranibizumab plus prompt or deferred laser or triamcinolone plus prompt laser for diabetic macular edema , 2010 .

[17]  D. Mccarty,et al.  Delivery of photocoagulation treatment for diabetic retinopathy at a large Australian ophthalmic hospital: comparisons with national clinical practice guidelines , 2002, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[18]  C H Wright,et al.  Initial in vivo results of a hybrid retinal photocoagulation system. , 2000, Journal of biomedical optics.