Vector constraints on western U.S. deformation from space geodesy, neotectonics, and plate motions

The rate-of-slip vector on the San Andreas fault in central California estimated from geodetic and Holocene geological data (34 ± 3 mm/yr, N41°W ± 2°) is inconsistent with the prediction of rigid plate models such as RM2 (56 ± 3 mm/yr, N35°W ± 2°). This well-known “San Andreas discrepancy” is diagnostic of plate deformation distributed both east of the fault in the Basin and Range and west of the fault along the California continental margin. We construct constraints on the integrated deformation rates across these two regions consistent with (1) the kinematical boundary conditions imposed by the rigid plate model, (2) neotectonic and paleoseismic estimates of deformation rates, (3) ground-based geodetic measurements, and (4) rates of change observed by very long baseline interferometry along seven baselines to western U.S. sites. The space-geodetic data on Basin and Range extension taken over a 4-year interval are compatible with geological observations averaged over the Holocene; the best estimate of its integrated deformation rate, provided by the joint inversion of both data types, is 9.7 ± 2.1 mm/yr, N56°W ±10°, too small and in the wrong direction to account entirely for the San Andreas discrepancy. We therefore attribute much of it to deformation west of the Sierra Nevada-Great Valley block accommodated, for example, on faults such as the San Gregorio-Hosgri system of coastal California. The integral of this deformation, estimated by subtracting the Basin and Range contribution from the discrepancy vector, requires significant right-lateral shear parallel to the San Andreas (13 ± 5 mm/yr) and some compression perpendicular to it (9 ± 3 mm/yr).

[1]  S. Solomon,et al.  Earthquake source mechanisms and transform fault tectonics in the Gulf of California , 1987 .

[2]  Y. Bock,et al.  A demonstration of 1–2 parts in 107 accuracy using GPS , 1986 .

[3]  I. Shapiro,et al.  Geodesy by radio interferometry: Evidence for contemporary plate motion , 1986 .

[4]  W. Prescott,et al.  Geodetic measurement of horizontal deformation in the northern San Francisco Bay region, California , 1986 .

[5]  R. Weldon,et al.  A kinematic model of southern California , 1986 .

[6]  Steven M. Klosko,et al.  Observing tectonic plate motions and deformations from satellite laser ranging , 1985 .

[7]  H. Frey,et al.  Space-Age Geodesy: The NASA Crustal Dynamics Project , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Thomas Yunck,et al.  GPS-Based Satellite Tracking System for Precise Positioning , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  A. Carol,et al.  NUVEL-1; a new global relative plate motion dataset and model , 1985 .

[10]  Richard H. Jahns,et al.  Holocene activity of the San Andreas fault at Wallace Creek , 1984 .

[11]  R. E. Wallace Patterns and timing of Late Quaternary faulting in the Great Basin Province and relation to some regional tectonic features , 1984 .

[12]  G. King,et al.  Seismic Potential Revealed by Surface Folding: 1983 Coalinga, California, Earthquake , 1984, Science.

[13]  T. Jordan,et al.  Vector Constraints on Quaternary Deformation of the Western United States East and West of the San Andreas Fault , 1984 .

[14]  J. Crouch,et al.  Post-Miocene Compressional Tectonics Along the Central California Margin , 1984 .

[15]  D. Hill Contemporary block tectonics: California and Nevada , 1982 .

[16]  A. Tarantola,et al.  Generalized Nonlinear Inverse Problems Solved Using the Least Squares Criterion (Paper 1R1855) , 1982 .

[17]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Geodetic measurement of crustal deformation on the San Andreas, Hayward, and Calaveras Faults near San Francisco, California , 1981 .

[18]  W. Prescott,et al.  Short-range distance measurements along the San Andreas fault system in central California, 1975 to 1979 , 1981 .

[19]  R. Yeats,et al.  Bathymetry and Oceanic Crustal Ages in the Vicinity of the Mouth of the Gulf of California, Illustrated Using Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 63 Underway Geophysical Profiles , 1981 .

[20]  C. Hall San Luis Obispo Transform Fault and Middle Miocene rotation of the Western Transverse Ranges, California , 1981 .

[21]  Mark D. Zoback,et al.  State of stress in the conterminous United States , 1980 .

[22]  W. Thatcher Systematic inversion of geodetic data in central California , 1979 .

[23]  C. G. Chase Plate kinematics: The Americas, East Africa, and the rest of the world , 1978 .

[24]  Thomas H. Jordan,et al.  Present‐day plate motions , 1977 .

[25]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Geodetic determination of relative plate motion in central California , 1973 .

[26]  D. B. Burke,et al.  Rate and Direction of Spreading in Dixie Valley, Basin and Range Province, Nevada , 1973 .

[27]  R. Larson,et al.  Relative velocities of the Pacific, North America and Cocos plates in the middle America region , 1970 .