Near-Field Spatial Correlation for Extremely Large-Scale Array Communications

Extremely large-scale array (XL-array) communications correspond to systems whose antenna sizes are so large that the scatterers and/or users may no longer be located in the far-field region. By discarding the conventional far-field uniform plane wave (UPW) assumption, this letter studies the near-field spatial correlation of XL-array communications, by taking into account the more generic non-uniform spherical wave (NUSW) characteristics. It is revealed that different from the far-field channel spatial correlation which only depends on the power angular spectrum (PAS), the near-field spatial correlation depends on the scattered power distribution not just characterized by their arriving angles, but also by the scatterers’ distances, which is termed as power location spectrum (PLS). A novel integral expression is derived for the near-field spatial correlation in terms of the scatterers’ location distribution, which includes the far-field spatial correlation as a special case. The result shows that different from the far-field case, the near-field spatial correlation no longer exhibits spatial stationarity in general, since the correlation coefficient for each pair of antennas depends on their specific positions, rather than their relative distance only. To gain further insights, we propose a generalized one-ring model for scatterer distribution, by allowing the ring center to be flexibly located rather than coinciding with the array center as in the conventional one-ring model. Numerical results are provided to show the necessity of the near-field spatial correlation modelling for XL-array communications.

[1]  Emil Björnson,et al.  Massive MIMO is a Reality - What is Next? Five Promising Research Directions for Antenna Arrays , 2019, ArXiv.

[2]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Non-Stationarities in Extra-Large-Scale Massive MIMO , 2019, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[3]  M. Skolnik,et al.  Introduction to Radar Systems , 2021, Advances in Adaptive Radar Detection and Range Estimation.

[4]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Extremely Large Aperture Massive MIMO: Low Complexity Receiver Architectures , 2018, 2018 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[5]  Shuangquan Wang,et al.  Time-Varying MIMO Channels: Parametric Statistical Modeling and Experimental Results , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[6]  Emil Björnson,et al.  Power Scaling Laws and Near-Field Behaviors of Massive MIMO and Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces , 2020, IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society.

[7]  Joseph M. Kahn,et al.  Fading correlation and its effect on the capacity of multielement antenna systems , 2000, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[8]  Ali Abdi,et al.  A space-time correlation model for multielement antenna systems in mobile fading channels , 2002, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[9]  Holger Boche,et al.  Channel capacity and capacity-range of beamforming in MIMO wireless systems under correlated fading with covariance feedback , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[10]  Yong Zeng,et al.  Communicating With Extremely Large-Scale Array/Surface: Unified Modeling and Performance Analysis , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[11]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Realizing Ultra-Massive MIMO (1024×1024) communication in the (0.06-10) Terahertz band , 2016, Nano Commun. Networks.

[12]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Benefit of pattern diversity via two-element array of circular patch antennas in indoor clustered MIMO channels , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[13]  Yong Zeng,et al.  How Does Performance Scale with Antenna Number for Extremely Large-Scale MIMO? , 2020, ICC 2021 - IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[14]  Ali Abdi,et al.  A parametric model for the distribution of the angle of arrival and the associated correlation function and power spectrum at the mobile station , 2002, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[15]  R. Bansal,et al.  Antenna theory; analysis and design , 1984, Proceedings of the IEEE.