On the Need for Knowledge of the Phase in Exploiting Known Primary Transmissions

Recently Tarokh and others have raised the possibility that a cognitive radio might know the interference signal being transmitted by a strong primary user in a non-causal way and use this knowledge to increase its data rates. However, there is a subtle difference between knowing the signal transmitted by the primary and the actual interference experienced at our receiver since there is a wireless channel between these two points. We show that even an unknown phase results in a substantial decrease in the data rates that can be achieved, and thus there is a need to feedback interference channel estimates to the cognitive transmitter. We give a scheme that uses appropriate "training" to obtain such estimates and quantify this scheme's required overhead as a function of the relevant coherence time and interference power.

[1]  Muriel Médard,et al.  XORs in the Air: Practical Wireless Network Coding , 2006, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[2]  Patrick Mitran,et al.  Achievable rates in cognitive radio channels , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  Anant Sahai,et al.  Writing on Rayleigh faded dirt: a computable upper bound to the outage capacity , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[4]  Anant Sahai,et al.  What is needed to exploit knowledge of primary transmissions? , 2007, ArXiv.

[5]  David Tse,et al.  Fundamentals of Wireless Communication , 2005 .

[6]  R. Gallager Information Theory and Reliable Communication , 1968 .

[7]  Emre Telatar,et al.  Capacity and mutual information of wideband multipath fading channels , 1998, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[8]  Shlomo Shamai,et al.  On the Capacity of Fading MIMO Broadcast Channels with Imperfect Transmitter Side-Information , 2006, ArXiv.

[9]  Antonia Maria Tulino,et al.  Optimum power allocation for parallel Gaussian channels with arbitrary input distributions , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[10]  Muriel Médard,et al.  Channel Coherence in the Low-SNR Regime , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[11]  Nihar Jindal,et al.  MIMO broadcast channels with finite rate feedback , 2006, GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005..

[12]  Nihar Jindal Finite Rate Feedback MIMO Broadcast Channels , 2006 .

[13]  Patrick Mitran,et al.  On compound channels with side information at the transmitter , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[14]  Mung Chiang,et al.  Duality between channel capacity and rate distortion with two-sided state information , 2002, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[15]  Gregory W. Wornell,et al.  Carbon Copying Onto Dirty Paper , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[17]  S. Shamai,et al.  Fading channels: how perfect need "perfect side information" be? , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Information Theory and Communications Workshop (Cat. No. 99EX253).

[18]  Wei Wu,et al.  On the Capacity of Gaussian Weak Interference Channels with Degraded Message sets , 2006, 2006 40th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[19]  Max H. M. Costa,et al.  Writing on dirty paper , 1983, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.