Helping you to help me: Exploring supportive interaction in online health community

People are able to express support for each other through online support groups by communicating their feelings and exchanging personalized information. In the domain of health information, this ability enables patients to connect with each other to build their own sense of community filled with healthy, supportive relationships. This paper reports a comparison of levels of social support types (informational, nurturant, and instrumental) that were identified among interactions across three different types of computer-mediated communication tools (forum, journals, and notes) from an online alcoholism support community. Findings show that people use each communication tool for different purposes, which can be associated with each tool's inherent design characteristics. Forums were used for exchanging information, whereas journals and notes were used for exchanging nurturant support. We suggest that this difference may be explained by the perceived levels of social support for each communication tool. These results can prove useful to health professionals in the development of social support systems for their patients that encourage health behavior change.

[1]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  FEATURESocial network sites and society: current trends and future possibilities , 2009, INTR.

[2]  Kyung-Hee Kim,et al.  Cying for Me, Cying for Us: Relational Dialectics in a Korean Social Network Site , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  L. Marlow,et al.  Peer-to-Peer Communication, Cancer Prevention, and the Internet , 2009, Journal of health communication.

[4]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[5]  Kevin B. Wright,et al.  Health-related Support Groups on the Internet: Linking Empirical Findings to Social Support and Computer-mediated Communication Theory , 2003, Journal of health psychology.

[6]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Handbook of Emotions , 1993 .

[7]  J. Stoppard,et al.  Gender, Context, and Expression of Positive Emotion , 1993 .

[8]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? , 2002 .

[9]  K. Wright Computer‐mediated support groups: An examination of relationships among social support, perceived stress, and coping strategies , 1999 .

[10]  Sheldon Cohen Social relationships and health. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[11]  Chris Yang,et al.  Social Support in Online Healthcare Social Networking , 2010 .

[12]  M. T. Høybye,et al.  Online interaction. Effects of storytelling in an internet breast cancer support group , 2005 .

[13]  Seungyeop Han,et al.  Analysis of topological characteristics of huge online social networking services , 2007, WWW '07.

[14]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Public dialogs in social network sites: What is their purpose? , 2010 .

[15]  K. Humphreys,et al.  Can targeting nondependent problem drinkers and providing internet-based services expand access to assistance for alcohol problems? A study of the moderation management self-help/mutual aid organization. , 2001, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[16]  A. Bambina Online Social Support: The Interplay of Social Networks and Computer-Mediated Communication , 2007 .

[17]  Kristen Campbell Eichhorn,et al.  Soliciting and Providing Social Support Over the Internet: An Investigation of Online Eating Disorder Support Groups , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[18]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  Relationship between the level of intimacy and lurking in online social network services , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  N. Ellison,et al.  Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis , 2008 .

[20]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[21]  Patricia M. Radin "Hello, my friends" : social capital and transformations of trust in a grassroots breast cancer Website , 2001 .

[22]  A. Winzelberg The analysis of an electronic support group for individuals with eating disorders , 1997 .

[23]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Structure and evolution of online social networks , 2006, KDD '06.

[24]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Yes, there is a correlation: - from social networks to personal behavior on the web , 2008, WWW.

[25]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[26]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  Predicting tie strength with social media , 2009, CHI.

[27]  J. Suhr,et al.  Controllability of Stressful Events and Satisfaction With Spouse Support Behaviors , 1992 .

[28]  Abby McCormack Individuals With Eating Disorders and the Use of Online Support Groups as a Form of Social Support , 2010, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[29]  M. Thelwall,et al.  Data mining emotion in social network communication: Gender differences in MySpace , 2010 .

[30]  Zeynep Tufekci Can You See Me Now? Audience and Disclosure Regulation in Online Social Network Sites , 2008 .

[31]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Impression Management 2.0 , 2008, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[32]  R. Lazarus,et al.  The health-related functions of social support , 1981, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.