A General Factor of Personality (GFP) from two meta-analyses of the Big Five: Digman (1997) and Mount, Barrick, Scullen, and Rounds (2005)

Abstract In two studies, we used structural equation models to test the hypothesis that a General Factor of Personality (GFP) occupies the apex of the hierarchy of personality. In Study 1, we found a GFP that explained 45% of the reliable variance in a model that went from the Big Five to the Big Two to the Big One in the 14 studies of inter-scale correlations ( N  = 4496) assembled by Digman (1997). A higher order factor of Alpha/Stability was defined by Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, and Agreeableness, with loadings of from 0.61 to 0.70, while Beta/Plasticity was defined by Openness and Extraversion with loadings of 0.55 and 0.77. In turn, the GFP was defined by Alpha and Beta with loadings of 0.67. In Study 2, a GFP explained 44% of the reliable variance in a similar model using data from a published meta-analysis of the Big Five ( N  = 4000) by Mount, Barrick, Scullen, and Rounds (2005). Strong general factors such as these, based on large data sets with good model fits that cross validate perfectly, are unlikely to be due to artifacts and response sets.

[1]  A. Figueredo,et al.  The heritability of life history strategy: The k‐factor, covitality, and personality , 2004, Social biology.

[2]  D. Templer Correlational and factor analytic support for Rushton's differential K life history theory , 2008 .

[3]  J. Bermúdez,et al.  Personality Psychology in Europe , 1997 .

[4]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  Better than the Alphabet: taxonomies of personality-descriptive terms in English, Dutch, and German , 1984 .

[5]  P. Costa,et al.  Facet Scales for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness: A Revision of the NEO Personality Inventory☆ , 1991 .

[6]  G. Bower,et al.  The evolution of a cognitive psychologist: a journey from simple behaviors to complex mental acts. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  C. Halverson,et al.  The Developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood , 1994 .

[8]  F. Lievens,et al.  Personnel selection. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  Differential K theory: The sociobiology of individual and group differences , 1985 .

[10]  M. Bond,et al.  Exploring the dimensions of Chinese person perception with indigenous and imported constructs: Creating a culturally balanced scale. , 1993 .

[11]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. , 1993 .

[12]  K. Schermelleh-Engel,et al.  Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. , 2003 .

[13]  A. Tomarken,et al.  Potential problems with "well fitting" models. , 2003, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[14]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Reply to Eysenck , 1992 .

[15]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[16]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  HIGHER‐ORDER DIMENSIONS OF THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS AND THE BIG SIX VOCATIONAL INTEREST TYPES , 2005 .

[17]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  What is beyond the big five? , 1998, Journal of personality.

[18]  H. Eysenck Personality psychology in Europe: Theoretical and empirical developments: H. Bonarius, G. Van Heck and N. Smid (Eds): Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, The Netherlands (1984). 90.00G , 1985 .

[19]  L. R. Goldberg A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models , 1999 .

[20]  J. M. Digman,et al.  Factors In The Natural Language Of Personality: Re-Analysis, Comparison, And Interpretation Of Six Major Studies. , 1981, Multivariate behavioral research.

[21]  J. M. Digman Child personality and temperament: Does the five-factor model embrace both domains. , 1994 .

[22]  J. Musek A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the five-factor model. , 2007 .

[23]  E. Wilson,et al.  Sociobiology: The New Synthesis , 1975 .

[24]  Jordan B. Peterson,et al.  Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? , 2002 .

[25]  P. Costa,et al.  Trait psychology comes of age. , 1991, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[26]  J. M. Digman Higher-order factors of the Big Five. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  W. Graziano,et al.  Probing the big five in adolescence: personality and adjustment during a developmental transition. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[28]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  Sexuality, delinquency and r/K reproductive strategies: Data from a Canadian University sample , 1989 .

[29]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  Sir Francis Galton, epigenetic rules, genetic similarity theory, and human life-history analysis. , 1990, Journal of personality.

[30]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  Behavioral Development and Construct Validity: The Principle of Aggregation , 1983 .

[31]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  The genetics and evolution of the general factor of personality , 2008 .

[32]  C. DeYoung Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.