The transaction contract of scarce materials in a supply chain: Paying a higher price to acquire a higher quantity

Abstract When a firm agrees to pay a higher price to a key parts supplier in order to guarantee availability when an unexpected supply chain disruption or a strong demand in a retail market causes a scarcity of a needed material, both the purchase price and the acquired quantity behave in a positive relationship, which is an uncommon but important characteristic in the design of supply chain transaction contracts. This article investigates the design of transaction contracts in the supply chain of a manufacturer and a supplier, where the supplier (upstream firm) determines the form of positive relationship of scarce materials between the unit purchase price and the acquired quantity and the manufacturer (downstream firm) chooses the acquired quantity of materials after knowing the contract terms. We investigate two various charging schemes: uniform and block charging schemes. We show that despite the implementation of the block charging scheme, which seems unfavourable to the supplier since the supplier charges less at a low level of acquired quantities, the contract may return the same profits to the supplier as the uniform charging scheme, which seems favourable to the supplier since the supplier can charge a high transacted price for all quantities.

[1]  Loo Hay Lee,et al.  Optimal bunkering contract in a buyer–seller supply chain under price and consumption uncertainty , 2015 .

[2]  Gérard P. Cachon Supply Chain Coordination with Contracts , 2003, Supply Chain Management.

[3]  Martin Hayden,et al.  Foundations of economics , 1978 .

[4]  John J. Boland WATER TARIFF DESIGN IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES : DISADVANTAGES OF INCREASING BLOCK TARIFFS ( IBTS ) AND ADVANTAGES OF UNIFORM PRICE WITH REBATE ( UPR ) , 2003 .

[5]  Albert Banal-Estañol,et al.  Behavioural simulations in spot electricity markets , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Abhijit Deshmukh,et al.  Analysis of supply contracts with quantity flexibility , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  R. Staelin,et al.  An Approach for Developing an Optimal Discount Pricing Policy , 1984 .

[8]  P. Pontrandolfo,et al.  Supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contracts , 2004 .

[9]  S. Gilbert,et al.  Note. the Role of Returns Policies in Pricing and Inventory Decisions for Catalogue Goods , 1998 .

[10]  Barry Alan Pasternack,et al.  Optimal Pricing and Return Policies for Perishable Commodities , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[11]  R. Dolan Quantity Discounts: Managerial Issues and Research Opportunities , 1987 .

[12]  Brian Tomlin,et al.  On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[13]  B. Douglas Bernheim,et al.  Veblen Effects in a Theory of Conspicuous Consumption , 1996 .

[14]  R. Green,et al.  Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[16]  James E. McClure,et al.  Promotions and product pricing: Parsimony versus Veblenesque demand , 2008 .

[17]  Gang Yu,et al.  Supply chain disruption management and evolutionarily stable strategies of retailers in the quantity-setting duopoly situation with homogeneous goods , 2006, European Journal of Operational Research.

[18]  Jennifer Blackhurst,et al.  Methodology for supply chain disruption analysis , 2007 .

[19]  Zuo-Jun Max Shen,et al.  Channel Performance Under Consignment Contract with Revenue Sharing , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Capacity Choice and Allocation: Strategic Behavior and Supply Chain Performance , 1999 .

[21]  Erica L. Plambeck,et al.  Decision, Risk & Operations Working Papers Series Supply Chain Relationships and Contracts: The Impact of Repeated Interaction on Capacity Investment and Procurement , 2006 .

[22]  Amy Z. Zeng,et al.  Single or dual sourcing: decision-making in the presence of supply chain disruption risks , 2009 .

[23]  Stephen J. Rassenti,et al.  Market Design and Human Trading Behavior in Electricity Markets , 2003 .

[24]  A. Tsay The Quantity Flexibility Contract and Supplier-Customer Incentives , 1999 .

[25]  Amy Z. Zeng,et al.  Coordination with a Backup Supplier Through Buy-Back Contract Under Supply Disruption , 2010 .

[26]  Arthur C. McIntosh,et al.  Asian Water Supplies: Reaching the Urban Poor , 2004 .

[27]  Michael Hugos Supply Chain Coordination , 2012 .

[28]  Loo Hay Lee,et al.  Bunkering decisions for a shipping liner in an uncertain environment with service contract , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Terry A. Taylor,et al.  Supply Chain Coordination Under Channel Rebates with Sales Effort Effects , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[30]  W. K. Wong,et al.  Coordinating supply chains with sales rebate contracts and vendor-managed inventory , 2009 .