A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research

This paper reviews the origins, techniques and roles associated with action research into information systems (IS). Many consider the approach to be the paragon of post-positivist research methods, yet it has a cloudy history among the social sciences. The paper summarizes the rigorous approach to action research and suggests certain domains of ideal use (such as systems development methodology). For those faced with conducting, reviewing or examining action research, the paper discusses various problems, opportunities and strategies.

[1]  Randolph B. Cooper,et al.  Review of management information systems research: A management support emphasis , 1988, Inf. Process. Manag..

[2]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  The ecology of MIS research: a twenty year status review , 1989, ICIS '89.

[3]  Donald F. Van Eynde,et al.  The Changing Practice of Organisation Development , 1990 .

[4]  Blake Ives,et al.  User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research , 1984 .

[5]  Peter Checkland,et al.  From Optimizing to Learning: A Development of Systems Thinking for the 1990s , 1985 .

[6]  S J Schurman,et al.  Action Research on Occupational Stress: Involving Workers as Researchers , 1989, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[7]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[8]  Fred H. Blum,et al.  Action Research--A Scientific Approach? , 1955, Philosophy of Science.

[9]  Frank F. Land,et al.  Viewpoint: choosing appropriate information systems research methodologies , 1987, CACM.

[10]  C. Webb,et al.  Action research: philosophy, methods and personal experiences. , 1989, Journal of advanced nursing.

[11]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Back to thinking mode: diaries for the management of information systems development projects , 1989 .

[12]  J. Kirk,et al.  Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research , 1985 .

[13]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[14]  M. Hult,et al.  TOWARDS A DEFINITION OF ACTION RESEARCH: A NOTE AND BIBLIOGRAPHY , 1980 .

[15]  F. Blackler.  Information technologies and organizations: Lessons from the 1980s and issues for the 1990s , 1988 .

[16]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[17]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  ICIS Paper: Methodological Issues in Experimental IS Research: Experiences and Recommendations , 1985, MIS Q..

[18]  Stanley E. Seashore.  The Design of Action Research , 1976 .

[19]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[21]  P. Checkland.  From framework through experience to learning: The essential nature of action research , 1991 .

[22]  Kari Lukka,et al.  Budgetary biasing in organizations: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence , 1988 .

[23]  A. T. C. Wood-Harper,et al.  Comparison of information systems definition methodologies: an action research, multiview perspective , 1990 .

[24]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[25]  S. Jowett,et al.  Hospital and community liaison links in nursing: the role of the liaison nurse. , 1988, Journal of advanced nursing.

[26]  Maurice Landry,et al.  Can the field of MIS be disciplined? , 1989, CACM.

[27]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  The Problem of Statistical Power in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[28]  R. Rapoport.  Three Dilemmas in Action Research , 1970 .

[29]  H. Klein,et al.  Information systems research: contemporary approaches and emergent traditions , 1991 .