Volumetric measurement of pulmonary nodules at low-dose chest CT: effect of reconstruction setting on measurement variability

ObjectiveTo assess volumetric measurement variability in pulmonary nodules detected at low-dose chest CT with three reconstruction settings.MethodsThe volume of 200 solid pulmonary nodules was measured three times using commercially available semi-automated software of low-dose chest CT data-sets reconstructed with 1 mm section thickness and a soft kernel (A), 2 mm and a soft kernel (B), and 2 mm and a sharp kernel (C), respectively. Repeatability coefficients of the three measurements within each setting were calculated by the Bland and Altman method. A three-level model was applied to test the impact of reconstruction setting on the measured volume.ResultsThe repeatability coefficients were 8.9, 22.5 and 37.5% for settings A, B and C. Three-level analysis showed that settings A and C yielded a 1.29 times higher estimate of nodule volume compared with setting B (P = 0.03). The significant interaction among setting, nodule location and morphology demonstrated that the effect of the reconstruction setting was different for different types of nodules. Low-dose CT reconstructed with 1 mm section thickness and a soft kernel provided the most repeatable volume measurement.ConclusionA wide, nodule-type-dependent range of agreement between volume measurements with different reconstruction settings suggests strict consistency is required for serial CT studies.

[1]  Binsheng Zhao,et al.  Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. , 2000, Radiology.

[2]  R. Reznek,et al.  CT assessment of tumour response to treatment: comparison of linear, cross-sectional and volumetric measures of tumour size. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  Richard C. Pais,et al.  Comparison of treatment response classifications between unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric measurements of metastatic lung lesions on chest computed tomography. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[4]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[5]  D. Xu,et al.  Nodule management protocol of the NELSON randomised lung cancer screening trial. , 2006, Lung cancer.

[6]  S Sone,et al.  Growth rate of small lung cancers detected on mass CT screening. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[8]  G. Chatellier,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: preliminary experience with three-dimensional evaluation. , 2004, Radiology.

[9]  Rajiv Gupta,et al.  Small pulmonary nodules: evaluation with repeat CT--preliminary experience. , 1999, Radiology.

[10]  L. Broemeling,et al.  Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: implications for assessment of tumor response. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  Noriyuki Tomiyama,et al.  Computer-assisted lung nodule volumetry from multi-detector row CT: influence of image reconstruction parameters. , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[12]  J. Goo,et al.  Volumetric measurement of synthetic lung nodules with multi-detector row CT: effect of various image reconstruction parameters and segmentation thresholds on measurement accuracy. , 2005, Radiology.

[13]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Pulmonary nodules detected at lung cancer screening: interobserver variability of semiautomated volume measurements. , 2006, Radiology.

[14]  K. Bae,et al.  Automated detection of pulmonary nodules on CT images: effect of section thickness and reconstruction interval--initial results. , 2005, Radiology.

[15]  M. Revel,et al.  Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable? , 2004, Radiology.

[16]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  Effect of nodule characteristics on variability of semiautomated volume measurements in pulmonary nodules detected in a lung cancer screening program. , 2008, Radiology.

[17]  H Nakata,et al.  Evolution of peripheral lung adenocarcinomas: CT findings correlated with histology and tumor doubling time. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  W. Heindel,et al.  Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility , 2003, European Radiology.

[19]  Margrit Betke,et al.  Small pulmonary nodules: volume measurement at chest CT--phantom study. , 2003, Radiology.

[20]  B. Nan,et al.  Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Simina C. Fluture,et al.  Small pulmonary nodules: reproducibility of three-dimensional volumetric measurement and estimation of time to follow-up CT. , 2004, Radiology.

[22]  Gilles Chatellier,et al.  Software volumetric evaluation of doubling times for differentiating benign versus malignant pulmonary nodules. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  F. Fischbach,et al.  Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness , 2003, European Radiology.